本文選題：環(huán)境不平等 + 基尼系數(shù)��； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來,中國經(jīng)濟高速發(fā)展,但是中國經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展很大程度上以污染環(huán)境為代價。隨著近幾年可持續(xù)發(fā)展概念的提出,人們逐漸意識到保護環(huán)境的重要性,但是對于不同地區(qū)以及不同省份之間的不平等,不管是政策層面還是學(xué)術(shù)層面,都沒得到足夠的重視。在此背景下,本文從中國實際出發(fā),對我國環(huán)境不平等問題進行測度,并且通過分解得出影響我國環(huán)境不平等的主要因素,為我國的環(huán)境污染排放調(diào)控提供理論依據(jù)和政策支持。本文首先對國內(nèi)外關(guān)于環(huán)境不平等的研究發(fā)展?fàn)顩r進行闡述介紹。在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,本文首先對中國總體環(huán)境污染狀況進行陳述,引入相關(guān)不平等測算指數(shù),如基尼系數(shù)、K指數(shù)、泰爾指數(shù)等主要三類不平等測算指數(shù)對中國不同地區(qū)的環(huán)境不平等狀況進行測算。然后利用回歸分解法對環(huán)境不平等的影響因素進行分解,得出影響環(huán)境不平等的主要因素。最后針對影響環(huán)境不平等的因素,提出相關(guān)結(jié)論建議。本文的結(jié)論主要有以下幾點:首先在從污染物排放的不平等程度來說,地區(qū)間工業(yè)固體廢棄物排放不平等程度最高,工業(yè)廢氣次之,工業(yè)廢水最低。從變化趨勢來看,從2000年到2014年,地區(qū)間工業(yè)廢水排放與工業(yè)廢氣排放不平等呈現(xiàn)U型過程,而工業(yè)固體廢棄物排放不平等則為N型。第二,通過對省際環(huán)境不平等的分析,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)在三類主要污染物的排放中,北京、天津、上海等省份污染物排放量占比要低于其GRP占比,而山西、河北等省份污染物排放占比則要高于其GRP占比,顯示出了各省份之間環(huán)境的不平等。第三,在各地區(qū)環(huán)境不平等的分析中,東部地區(qū)的各省市受經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平和工業(yè)化進程的影響,工業(yè)污染排放差異最為明顯。最后,通過夏普利值分解,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)在影響環(huán)境不平等的因素中,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)起主要作用,對外依存度與外商投資水平影響較小。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has developed rapidly, but to a large extent, the development of China's economy is at the expense of polluting the environment. With the development of the concept of sustainable development in recent years, people have gradually realized the importance of protecting the environment, but the inequality between different regions and provinces has not been paid enough attention to, whether at the policy level or the academic level. Under this background, this paper measures the problem of environmental inequality in China from the point of view of the reality of China, and obtains the main factors that affect the environmental inequality of our country by decomposing. It provides theoretical basis and policy support for the regulation and control of environmental pollution emissions in China. This paper first introduces the research and development of environmental inequality at home and abroad. On the basis of previous studies, this paper first describes the overall environmental pollution situation in China, and introduces the related inequality measurement index, such as the Gini coefficient K index. The main three types of inequality measurement indices, such as the Thiel Index, measure the environmental inequality in different regions of China. Then the factors affecting environmental inequality are decomposed by regression decomposition method, and the main factors affecting environmental inequality are obtained. Finally, some conclusions and suggestions are put forward in view of the factors affecting environmental inequality. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: firstly, in terms of the inequality of pollutant discharge, the inequality of industrial solid waste discharge among regions is the highest, the industrial waste gas is the second, and the industrial wastewater is the lowest. From 2000 to 2014, the inequality of industrial wastewater discharge and industrial waste gas emission is U-type process, while the industrial solid waste discharge inequality is N-type. Second, through the analysis of the environmental inequality between provinces, we find that among the three major pollutants discharged, Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and other provinces account for less than their GRP share, while Shanxi, The proportion of pollutant emission in Hebei and other provinces is higher than that in GRP, which shows the environmental inequality among provinces. Thirdly, in the analysis of the environmental inequality in different regions, the differences of industrial pollution emissions are most obvious among the provinces and cities in the eastern region affected by the level of economic development and the process of industrialization. Finally, through the decomposition of Sharpley value, we find that the industrial structure plays a major role in influencing the environmental inequality, and the degree of dependence on foreign countries and the level of foreign investment have little influence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：X321

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 祁毓;盧洪友;;“環(huán)境貧困陷阱”發(fā)生機理與中國環(huán)境拐點[J];中國人口·資源與環(huán)境;2015年10期

2 李治國;周德田;;基于VAR模型的經(jīng)濟增長與環(huán)境污染關(guān)系實證分析——以山東省為例[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2013年08期

3 鄒紅;李奧蕾;喻開志;;消費不平等的度量、出生組分解和形成機制——兼與收入不平等比較[J];經(jīng)濟學(xué)(季刊);2013年04期

4 鄒紅;喻開志;;城鎮(zhèn)家庭消費不平等的度量和分解——基于廣東省城鎮(zhèn)住戶調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟評論;2013年03期

5 陳純槿;李實;;城鎮(zhèn)勞動力市場結(jié)構(gòu)變遷與收入不平等:1989～2009[J];管理世界;2013年01期

6 鐘茂初;閆文娟;;環(huán)境公平問題既有研究述評及研究框架思考[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2012年06期

7 閆文娟;郭樹龍;熊艷;;政府規(guī)制和公眾參與對中國環(huán)境不公平的影響——基于動態(tài)面板及中國省際工業(yè)廢水排放面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗研究[J];產(chǎn)經(jīng)評論;2012年03期

8 劉安國;;不平衡發(fā)展條件下區(qū)域經(jīng)濟與環(huán)境福利雙重不平等假說——基于中國省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟問題探索;2012年01期

9 李姝;;城市化、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整與環(huán)境污染[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2011年06期

10 王慧;;被忽視的正義——環(huán)境保護中市場機制的非正義及其法律應(yīng)對[J];云南財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年06期

，

本文編號：1970326