【摘要】：正晚清以來中國經(jīng)史之學(xué)的興衰與佛學(xué)的復(fù)興存在密切的關(guān)聯(lián),類型各異的佛教學(xué)術(shù)運(yùn)動(dòng)背后都與經(jīng)學(xué)之間發(fā)生了密切的互動(dòng),此為近代學(xué)術(shù)思想史及佛學(xué)史研究者不可不注意的問題。從民國佛教經(jīng)史學(xué)的研究來看,支那內(nèi)學(xué)院與武昌佛學(xué)院可以看作最有代表性的兩個(gè)學(xué)術(shù)共同體。~①可以說,他們雖然都有條件地接受近代學(xué)術(shù)的法則,而最終還是要保持住經(jīng)學(xué)的優(yōu)越地位。一1.兩院經(jīng)學(xué)之異同。對于內(nèi)院與武院的佛學(xué)研究來說,經(jīng)典之學(xué)成為他們的核心,他們無論在研
[Abstract]:Since the late Qing Dynasty, there has been a close relationship between the rise and fall of Chinese classics history and the revival of Buddhism, and there has been close interaction between different types of Buddhist academic movements and Confucian classics. This is a problem that researchers in the history of modern academic thought and the history of Buddhism cannot afford to pay attention to. From the study of the history of the Buddhist scriptures of the Republic of China, the ** Institute and the Wuchang Buddhist Institute can be regarded as the two most representative academic communities. In the end, it is necessary to maintain the superior position of Confucian classics. One. The similarities and differences between the two houses of classics. For the study of Buddhism in the inner and the martial arts, the classical study became their core, whether they were studying it or not.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“中國佛教解經(jīng)學(xué)專題研究”(13AZD031);國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金一般項(xiàng)目“經(jīng)典解釋與佛教中國化研究”(13BZJ015)的階段性研究成果
【分類號】：B948

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汲U，

本文編號：2399356