本文關鍵詞： 司馬遷 韓信 謀反罪 互見法　出處：《中州學刊》2016年08期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：從互見法的角度來重新審視韓信的"謀反",我們能得出相對客觀的結論,即韓信謀反之罪是劉邦、呂后忌憚其能的結果。從互見法的角度分析薄太后為周勃的"辯護"、彭越的冤案、蕭何的遭遇等,可以證明韓信的清白。韓信謀反案在檔案文書中早有記載,司馬遷作為漢朝史官,只能按照"爰書"敘史,這其實是另一種意義的"實錄"。對于韓信的悲慘遭遇,司馬遷有自己的評判,司馬遷通過多處互見法的靈活運用透露出了許多重要信息。
[Abstract]:To re-examine Han Xin's "rebellion" from the perspective of the law of mutual recognition, we can draw a relatively objective conclusion that the crime of the conspiracy of Han Xin is Liu Bang. Lu Hou is afraid of the result of his ability. From the perspective of the law of mutual understanding, the analysis of Queen Mother Bo as Zhou Bo's "defense", Peng Yue's injustice case, Xiao he's encounter, etc., can prove Han Xin's innocence. Han Xin's conspiracy case has long been recorded in the archival documents. Si Maqian, as a historian of the Han Dynasty, can only tell history according to "leading the book." this is in fact a "factual record" of another kind of meaning. As for the tragic experience of Han Xin, Si Maqian has its own judgment. Si Maqian revealed a lot of important information through the flexible application of the mutual-seeing method.
【作者單位】： 曲阜師范大學文學院;臨沂大學文學院;
【基金】：2013年度山東省教育廳高等學校人文社科研究項目“史記心理描寫藝術研究”(J13WD31) 2015年度臨沂大學哲學社會科學發(fā)展項目“漢武帝新政背景下的文學嬗變研究”(15LUZS01)
【分類號】：K234.1
，

本文編號：1545398