發(fā)布時間：2018-02-20 23:27

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 中國城市史 方法 視野 維度　出處：《學(xué)術(shù)月刊》2009年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：熊月之認(rèn)為,中國傳統(tǒng)城市與歐洲古代城市的根本不同之處,在于自古以來城鄉(xiāng)文化一致性、城鄉(xiāng)行政一體性的特點(diǎn)沒有改變;即使近代通商口岸的出現(xiàn),強(qiáng)烈地沖擊了中國傳統(tǒng)城市的體制,但城鄉(xiāng)文化一致性在通商口岸仍有頑強(qiáng)表現(xiàn),城鄉(xiāng)行政一體性在非通商口岸依然存在。戴一峰認(rèn)為,目前城市史研究存在著兩種不同的視野——內(nèi)向性視野和外向性視野,而中國的大多數(shù)學(xué)者更偏好于內(nèi)向性視野,應(yīng)當(dāng)在今后的城市史研究中大力提倡內(nèi)向性視野與外向性視野的交叉并用。張利民認(rèn)為,近代以來城鄉(xiāng)對立的關(guān)系不僅沒有得到緩解,反而出現(xiàn)城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展脫節(jié)、城鄉(xiāng)差別迅速擴(kuò)大狀態(tài);因?yàn)樽陨韯恿Σ蛔愫偷貌坏洁l(xiāng)村的支持,結(jié)果是限制了近代中國城市的整體發(fā)展水平。何一民認(rèn)為,科學(xué)地劃分中國城市史的不同發(fā)展時期,對于研究中國城市歷史十分重要;而以生產(chǎn)力和生產(chǎn)技術(shù)的變革作為劃分城市分期的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),可以將中國城市歷史劃分為農(nóng)業(yè)時代、工業(yè)時代、信息時代三個時期。陳蘊(yùn)茜認(rèn)為,中國城市轉(zhuǎn)型是社會系統(tǒng)轉(zhuǎn)型的一個縮影,它涉及社會、政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、記憶、認(rèn)同等眾多層面,而"空間"卻是可以充分展示這種轉(zhuǎn)型現(xiàn)代性特征的重要維度;將"空間"引入中國城市史研究,能夠更深入地揭示中國城市演化的獨(dú)特規(guī)律。
[Abstract]:Xiong Yuezhi believes that the fundamental difference between Chinese traditional cities and ancient European cities lies in the cultural consistency between urban and rural areas since ancient times, and the characteristics of urban and rural administrative unity have not changed; even with the appearance of modern commercial ports, It has strongly impacted the system of Chinese traditional cities, but the cultural consistency between urban and rural areas is still tenacious at commercial ports, and the administrative unity of urban and rural areas still exists at non-commercial ports. At present, there are two different perspectives in the study of urban history: introverted vision and extroverted visual field, while most Chinese scholars prefer introverted vision. In the future study of urban history, we should vigorously promote the combination of introverted and extroverted horizons. Zhang Limin believes that the antagonistic relationship between urban and rural areas has not been alleviated since modern times, on the contrary, there has been a disconnect between urban and rural development. The gap between urban and rural areas is rapidly expanding; because of their own lack of motivation and lack of rural support, the result is that the overall development level of modern Chinese cities is limited. He Yimin believes that the different periods of development of China's urban history are scientifically divided. It is very important to study the history of Chinese cities, and the history of Chinese cities can be divided into three periods: the agricultural age, the industrial age and the information age, according to Chen Yunxi, who regards the transformation of productivity and production technology as the criterion for dividing the city into stages. The transformation of Chinese cities is a microcosm of the transformation of social system. It involves many aspects such as society, politics, economy, culture, memory, identity and so on, while "space" is an important dimension that can fully display the characteristics of this transition modernity. Introducing "space" into the study of Chinese urban history can reveal the unique law of urban evolution in China.
【作者單位】： 廈門大學(xué)嘉庚學(xué)院;
【分類號】：K207

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 戴一峰;閩南華僑與近代廈門城市經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展[J];華僑華人歷史研究;1994年02期

2 熊月之;張生;;中國城市史研究綜述(1986-2006)[J];史林;2008年01期

3 趙岡;論中國歷史上的市鎮(zhèn)[J];中國社會經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究;1992年02期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程東宇;;20世紀(jì)30年代以來唐代商品市場研究綜述[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期

2 李百浩;嚴(yán)昕;;近代廈門舊城改造規(guī)劃實(shí)踐及思想(1920—1938年)[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2008年03期

3 潘健;;三十年來近代福建經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究述略[J];福建省社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

4 姚宇;;中國縣城經(jīng)濟(jì)功用的歷史考證[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2009年09期

5 劉榮;;“資治”和“通鑒”:城市史研究中的悖論[J];城市觀察;2011年03期

6 徐暢;;近代中國國內(nèi)的糧食流通與糧食進(jìn)口[J];東岳論叢;2011年11期

7 唐虹;秦飛;;城市人、環(huán)境、文化的最優(yōu)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展模式——生態(tài)園林城市[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2012年02期

8 范松;;貴州城鎮(zhèn)起源特殊性的歷史觀察[J];貴州社會科學(xué);2012年06期

9 郭e，

本文編號：1520332