本文關(guān)鍵詞： 蘇轍 《春秋集解》 《春秋》 義例 大義　出處：《山東師范大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：蘇轍是北宋時期的文學家、經(jīng)學家，也是“唐宋八大家”之一。在經(jīng)學方面，他對北宋《春秋》學盛行“經(jīng)傳并荒”之風作了深刻的反思。蘇轍治《春秋》，“集諸家之義而裁之”，主采《左傳》，兼采《公》《谷》、啖、趙諸家，采取較為開放的態(tài)度；強調(diào)以史為據(jù)，重申《左傳》的解經(jīng)價值，肯定《春秋》是經(jīng)而非史，對后世《春秋》學的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了一定的影響。 本文以蘇轍的《春秋集解》為研究對象，在綜合前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上，從經(jīng)學文獻的角度進行更為深入的研究。本文內(nèi)容共分為四個部分： 第一章，蘇轍生平及其著述簡介。蘇轍與其父兄并稱“三蘇”。他歷經(jīng)北宋仁宗、英宗、神宗、哲宗、徽宗五朝，宦海沉浮，一生命運坎坷；后退隱龍川十三年，潛心著述，著作頗豐，分為文學著作和經(jīng)學著作兩部分。 第二章，《春秋集解》的成書背景。本章分三節(jié)探討蘇轍著此書的背景情況。第一節(jié)，北宋的經(jīng)學變革。北宋時期，經(jīng)學進入變古時代，漢唐建立的經(jīng)學體系遭到了前所未有的質(zhì)疑與挑戰(zhàn)。第二節(jié)，北宋的《春秋》學概況。宋代統(tǒng)治者為政治需求，極力提倡士人治經(jīng)，《春秋》學在此經(jīng)學變革中較為凸顯，也得到一定程度的發(fā)展。第三節(jié)，家學影響。蘇洵、蘇軾對蘇轍《春秋集解》寫作都有一定的影響。蘇轍提到自己受業(yè)于父，也曾在詩文中多次提到自己“學于兄”，并稱蘇軾既是其兄，亦是其師友。 第三章，《春秋集解》內(nèi)容概述。本章共分為六節(jié)。第一節(jié)，對《春秋》性質(zhì)的認定。蘇轍認為《春秋》是孔子“遺言”，用以垂教后世的典范之作。第二節(jié)，對《春秋》功用的認識。蘇轍認為《春秋》有垂教后世的功用，孔子作《春秋》就是為了張禮義，譏不正，，教化人們尊禮義，守王法。第三節(jié)，研究《春秋》的方法。蘇轍在以事解《春秋》時，主采《左傳》；以義例解《春秋》時，多取《公羊傳》和《谷梁傳》。蘇轍治《春秋》雖重《左傳》，自稱當以事解《春秋》，但在《春秋集解》一書中單純以事解《春秋》之處并不多，反而多以例解《春秋》。第四節(jié)，對《春秋》大義的具體闡釋；第五節(jié)，對三傳的批評；第六節(jié)，對《春秋》義例的新見解。 第四章，蘇轍《春秋集解》對后世的影響及后人評說。本章分兩個方面論述：一是蘇轍后代及其弟子對其《春秋》學的繼承，蘇轍晚年，以閉門著書，教導諸孫為樂。宋代以來的學者治《春秋》，多有轉(zhuǎn)引蘇轍《春秋集解》的內(nèi)容。二是諸家對《春秋集解》的評價。葉夢得、陳弘緒等人對《春秋集解》多有批評，而張萱較為認可此書，《四庫全書總目提要》也在一定程度上對此書給與了肯定。
[Abstract]:Su Zhe was a litterateur, economist, and one of the "eight great schools of the Tang and Song dynasties" in the Northern Song Dynasty. He made a profound reflection on the prevailing trend of "the classics passing on and the desolation" in the Northern Song Dynasty. Su rut governed the "Spring and Autumn period", "collected the meaning of all the families and cut it out", and adopted the "Zuo Zhuan" as well as the "Gong > < Gu], eating and Zhao's family, taking a more open attitude;" Emphasizing on the history as the basis, reiterating the value of Zuo Zhuan's interpretation of the classics, affirming that the Spring and Autumn period is the classics rather than the history, and exerting a certain influence on the development of the study of the Spring and Autumn period in later generations. This paper takes Su Ruo's "Spring and Autumn Collection solution" as the research object, on the basis of synthesizing the previous studies, carries on a more in-depth research from the angle of the Confucian classics literature. The content of this paper is divided into four parts altogether:. The first chapter is a brief introduction to Su Zhe's life and his writings. Su Zhe and his father and brother are also called "three Su". He has lived through the five dynasties of Northern Song Dynasty, Renzong, Yingzong, Shenzong, Zhe Zong, Huizong, and the ups and downs of the sea of officials, and the fate of his life has been bumpy. After 13 years of his retirement from Long Chuan, he wrote painstakingly. The works are abundant and are divided into two parts: literary works and classics works. Chapter two, the background of the book of the Spring and Autumn Chronicles. This chapter discusses the background of Su Zhe's book in three sections. The first section is the change of the Confucian classics in the Northern Song Dynasty. In the Northern Song Dynasty, the study of the classics entered the period of changing the ancient times. The Confucian classics system established in the Han and Tang dynasties was questioned and challenged unprecedented. Section two, the "Spring and Autumn period" of the Northern Song Dynasty. The rulers of the Song Dynasty urged the scholars to govern the classics for the sake of political needs, and the "Spring and Autumn period" learning became more prominent in the reform of the Confucian classics. The third section is the influence of family science. Su Xun and Su Shi have a certain influence on the writing of Su Zhe's Chun Qiu Ji. Su Zhe mentions that he was educated by his father. In his poems, Sushi has repeatedly mentioned that he "learned from his brother" and said that Su Shi is both his brother and his teacher. The first section is about the nature of the Spring and Autumn period. Su Zhe thinks that the Spring and Autumn period is Confucius'"last words", which is used to teach the model of later generations. The understanding of the function of "Spring and Autumn". Su Zhe believes that "Spring and Autumn" has the function of teaching later generations. Confucius wrote "Spring and Autumn" for the sake of Zhang Liyi, ridiculed, and educated people to respect the propriety and observe the law of the king. The method of studying "Spring and Autumn". When Su rut took the "Zuo Zhuan" in the interpretation of "Spring and Autumn", he took "Zuo Zhuan" as an example, and "Spring and Autumn" as an example. Su Ruozhi [Spring and Autumn], although he stressed "Zuo Zhuan" and claimed to be the cause of "Spring and Autumn", there are not many places in the book "Spring and Autumn" simply to explain "Spring and Autumn", but many examples of "Spring and Autumn > 4th," The concrete explanation of the meaning of the Spring and Autumn period; the criticism of the three legends in verse 5th; the new opinion on the example of the meaning of the Spring and Autumn period in verse 6th. In chapter 4th, the influence of Su Zhe's "Spring and Autumn Collection" on later generations and his comments on later generations are discussed. This chapter is divided into two aspects: one is the inheritance of the study of "Spring and Autumn" by Su Zhe's descendants and his disciples, and Su Zhe wrote books behind closed doors in his later years. Teaching Sun Wei-le. Since the Song Dynasty, scholars who have governed the Spring and Autumn period have often cited the contents of Su Rut's interpretation of the Spring and Autumn Collection. Second, they have commented on the "Spring and Autumn Collection solution." Ye Mengde, Chen Hongxu, and others have criticized the "Spring and Autumn Collection solution". Zhang Xuan is more approbated to this book, the outline of the book also to a certain extent to the book.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：K225.04

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 郝明工;北宋經(jīng)學論略[J];重慶師院學報(哲學社會科學版);1995年04期

2 馬春玲;;蘇轍晚年寓居史料初探[J];檔案管理;2012年03期

3 杜敬勇;;蘇轍《春秋集解》淺論[J];哈爾濱學院學報;2006年12期

4 張高評;;蘇轍《春秋集解》以史傳經(jīng)初探[J];南京師范大學文學院學報;2007年03期

5 楊朝亮;宋初“三先生”學術(shù)思想考論[J];齊魯學刊;2002年01期

6 文廷海;丁光泮;;蘇轍《春秋集解》思想解讀[J];求索;2008年07期

本文編號：1512875