本文關(guān)鍵詞： 《洙泗考信錄》 平議 孔子 過宋 厄于陳蔡 歸魯 遺型　出處：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：孔子是春秋末期的思想家和教育家，儒家學(xué)派的創(chuàng)始人，是集華夏上古文化之大成者�？甲C孔子生平事跡是進(jìn)一步研究孔子思想及早期儒學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)，孟子曰：“頌其詩，讀其書，不知其人，可乎！”崔述正是本著“知人論世”之宗旨而撰寫了《洙泗考信錄》。該書以時(shí)間為線索，全面考證了孔子的一生的事跡。其論述不無創(chuàng)獲，但問題也很多。例如，一味迷信經(jīng)書而對諸子及其他傳記材料妄加懷疑，這無疑造成為其考證過程中出現(xiàn)諸多局限的主要原因�；诖艘颍疚脑噲D對其有問題的部分進(jìn)行平議，以求公允客觀。另外，《洙泗考信錄》一書是研究孔子及儒學(xué)的重要著作，而對該書進(jìn)行研究，對于推動(dòng)孔子及儒學(xué)的研究具有一定意義。 本文主要就其三、四兩卷進(jìn)行研究，涉及孔子周游列國至孔子逝世這一時(shí)間段的歷史事件。對于每一章節(jié)，，先列古書中關(guān)于孔子的某一事件的記載，再列出崔述對其進(jìn)行考辨的內(nèi)容，最后再由筆者以按語的方式對崔述的論據(jù)及論點(diǎn)進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)考辨。每一章的章題，原系顧頡剛在整理《崔東壁遺書》時(shí)所加，比較準(zhǔn)確地概括崔述每一篇考證的具體內(nèi)容，因此本文直接采用之。 本文節(jié)選其中十九章進(jìn)行研究和平議，而這十九章之間前后沒有必然的邏輯關(guān)系。因此，限于摘要篇幅的限制而不能一一列出每一章的具體內(nèi)容和結(jié)論，只能大體歸納一下本文寫作所要解決的主要問題。 通過對平議，筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)崔述《洙泗考信錄》的問題重要有三種：第一，主觀臆斷和邏輯推理的成分較多，以至于妄下結(jié)論，說服力不夠。對于這些問題，我們主要通過切實(shí)合理的材料來反駁之。第二，有一些是結(jié)論正確，但論據(jù)不足或所引論據(jù)本身是錯(cuò)誤的。對于這種現(xiàn)象，我們或補(bǔ)充其論據(jù)，或糾正其錯(cuò)誤論據(jù)。第三，他由思想的局限性所造成的迷信經(jīng)書和過于推崇圣人形象而對一些有辱圣人形象的史料妄加批評的地方，我們則予以糾正，以期盡可能還原孔子真實(shí)的形象。 當(dāng)然，《洙泗考信錄》中也不乏卓見和啟人深思的地方。因此，筆者在寫作過程中進(jìn)一步做了總結(jié)和補(bǔ)充，做到真正的平議以力求公允。
[Abstract]:Confucius was a thinker and educator at the end of the Spring and Autumn period, the founder of the Confucian School, and a master of ancient Chinese culture. Textual research on Confucius' life and deeds is the basis for further study of Confucius thought and early Confucianism. Mencius said, "praise its poems and read its books. I don't know, but! "Cui Shu wrote" Su-si Kao Xin Lu "with the aim of" knowing the people and on the world ". The book takes time as a clue and comprehensively examines Confucius's life story. His exposition has not been without achievements, but there are many problems. For example, Blindly superstition of the classics and other biographical materials is doubtless the main reason for its limitations in the process of textual research. For this reason, this paper attempts to discuss the problematic parts of the book. In addition, the book "Su Si Kao Xin Lu" is an important work in the study of Confucius and Confucianism, and the study of this book has certain significance for promoting the study of Confucius and Confucianism. This paper mainly studies the historical events between the countries of Confucius Zhou You and the death of Confucius. For each chapter, it first lists the records of an event of Confucius in ancient books. Then it lists the contents of Cui Shu's examination and argument, and finally the author systematically examines Cui's arguments and arguments by means of notes. The chapter title of each chapter was originally added by Gu Jiegang when sorting out Cui Dongbi's suicide note. More accurate summary Cui each textual research specific content, therefore this article uses it directly. In this paper, 19 chapters are selected for research and discussion, and there is no necessary logical relationship between the 19 chapters. Therefore, the specific contents and conclusions of each chapter can not be listed one by one due to the limitation of the length of the summary. We can only generalize the main problems to be solved in this paper. On the basis of the discussion, the author finds that there are three important problems in Cui Shu's "Su Si Kao Xin Lu": first, there are so many elements of subjective supposition and logical reasoning that they are not convincing enough to jump to conclusions. We refute it mainly through practical and reasonable material. Secondly, some conclusions are correct, but the arguments are inadequate or the arguments cited are wrong. For this phenomenon, we either add their arguments or correct them. Third, In order to restore the true image of Confucius, we correct the superstition and scripture caused by the limitation of his thoughts and his overpraise of the image of the sage and criticize some historical materials which dishonor the image of the sage in order to restore the true image of Confucius as much as possible. Of course, there are also many insights and thought-provoking points in Su-si. Therefore, the author made a further summary and supplement in the process of writing, so as to achieve a true level of discussion in order to strive for fairness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K206

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 賈德永;《洙泗考信錄》（一、二）卷之平議[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2012年

2 樊東;《洙泗考信錄》（卷三、四）平議[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：1510305