本文關(guān)鍵詞：叛亂視野下的西漢王國政策　出處：《煙臺大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版)》2016年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 王國政策 王國叛亂 王國封地

【摘要】：諸呂之亂、七國之亂的爆發(fā)與大規(guī)模削奪王國封地有著較大或直接的關(guān)聯(lián)。文帝時期的王國政策分為"收國"與"分國"前后兩個階段,二者都建立在對呂后時期王國政策的反思和借鑒的基礎(chǔ)上,賈誼的"眾建"之策無法涵括文帝時期的王國政策。七國之亂的爆發(fā)宣告了晁錯削藩政策的失敗,戰(zhàn)后對王國封地的削奪也是對戰(zhàn)敗者的一種懲罰方式,不能單純視為削藩政策的延續(xù),"削藩"同樣無法涵括景帝時期的王國政策。從叛亂的視角來看,西漢前期王國政策的演變是一個對實踐不斷反思、調(diào)整和更新的動態(tài)過程。
[Abstract]:The outbreak of the chaos of Lu and the Seven Kingdoms had a great or direct connection with the large-scale expropriation of the feudal land of the Kingdom. The policy of the Kingdom in the period of Emperor Wen was divided into two stages: the period of "taking the country" and "dividing the country". Both of them are based on the reflection and reference of the policy of the Kingdom of Luhou, Jia Yi's policy of "mass building" can not include the imperial policy of Emperor Wen Dynasty. The outbreak of the "Seven Kingdoms" declared the failure of Chao Cuo's policy of cutting off the vassals. After the war, the expropriation of the kingdom was also a punishment for the defeated, which could not be regarded as a continuation of the policy of cutting off the vassal state. "cutting off the vassal" could not include the policy of kingship in the King's time, and from the angle of the insurrection, it could not be regarded as a continuation of the policy. The evolution of kingdom policy in the early Western Han Dynasty was a dynamic process of continuous reflection, adjustment and renewal of practice.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號】：K234.1
【正文快照】： 對西漢前期王國政策的演變問題,學(xué)界多有研究。1但無論是對王國政策演變的一般性論述,還是對各項政策的商榷性考察,以往的研究多立足于由“眾建”到“削藩”再到“推恩”的遞進式歷程。另一方面,王國叛亂是漢初較為頻繁的政治現(xiàn)象。叛亂的爆發(fā)意味著王國政策的中斷。對叛亂的，

本文編號：1422711