本文選題：新唐書 + 本紀��； 參考：《吉林大學》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 唐朝作為我國封建社會的一代盛世,文化繁榮,經(jīng)濟發(fā)達,相關的史料十分豐富。“二十四史”中就并存了新、舊兩部《唐書》,是我們研究唐代歷史的基本材料�！缎绿茣沸蕹�,即為“官方正史”,得到朝廷上下的普遍認可,而《舊唐書》的流傳范圍逐漸變小。同時兩《唐書》優(yōu)劣問題也成為許多學者討論的一個焦點,并逐漸形成一個比較普遍的看法,認為《舊唐書》紀事詳備,而失于蕪雜;《新唐書》紀事簡明,體例完善,但不免失于漏略。其中《新唐書》本紀部分使用《春秋》筆法,刪削過甚,價值最低,尤為學界之通論。這種說法主要從史料價值角度立論,也與前人對本紀研究相對較少有關。本文概述宋人編纂《新唐書》之目的和經(jīng)過,以及后人關于兩《唐書》優(yōu)劣的評論,并在前人研究基礎上,著重考證《新紀》增刪《舊紀》的情況,及其在干支系時方面的成就和不足,評價其重視書法問題的意義和缺陷。通過研究,可以看出《新紀》在詳略適當、把握唐代歷史進程和規(guī)律方面都大大超過《舊紀》;它在大量刪削《舊紀》的同時,也增加了不少史料,特別是《則天紀》、《僖宗}\0》部分尤為明顯,其干支系時糾正和補充了部分《舊紀》之誤漏。從總體上說,《新紀》達到了宋人的編纂目的,在全書中并不比志表傳遜色。它作為《新唐書》的重要部分,對宋以后史學的發(fā)展產生了一定的積極作用。所謂“本紀最下”的評價,未見公允。這一新結論是本文的一個重要突破。
[Abstract]:The Tang Dynasty, as the prosperous era of feudal society in China, had a prosperous culture and developed economy. The two old books of the Tang Dynasty are the basic materials for us to study the history of the Tang Dynasty. The revision of the Book of the New Tang Dynasty, that is, the official official History, was generally recognized by the court. The spread of the Old Book of Tang became smaller. At the same time, the merits and demerits of the two "Tang Shu" also became a focus of discussion by many scholars, and gradually formed a more general view that the chronicle of the "Old Tang Book" was prepared in detail, but lost in the confusion; the "New Tang Book" Chronicle was concise and perfect in style. But I can't help but miss out. Among them, this part of the book of New Tang Dynasty uses the method of "Spring and Autumn period", which is the lowest value, especially the general theory of academic circles. This theory is mainly based on historical data value, but also related to the relative lack of previous research on this period. This paper summarizes the purpose and process of the compilation of the book of the New Tang Dynasty by the Song Dynasty, as well as the comments on the merits and demerits of the two books of the Tang Dynasty by later generations, and on the basis of the previous studies, it emphasizes the textual research on the addition and deletion of the book of the old one. And its achievements and shortcomings in the branch system, evaluate the significance and shortcomings of its attention to calligraphy. Through the study, we can see that the "New period" has greatly exceeded the "Old period" in terms of understanding the historical process and law of the Tang Dynasty, and it has also added a lot of historical materials while deleting the "Old period" in a large number. In particular, the part of < Xizong} > is especially obvious, and its trunk and branch system corrects and supplements some of the errors and leaks of the old period. On the whole, the New period has achieved the purpose of compiling the Song Dynasty and is not inferior to the Biography in the book. As an important part of New Tang Shu, it played a positive role in the development of historiography after Song Dynasty. The assessment of the so-called "the lowest of this discipline" has not been fair. This new conclusion is an important breakthrough in this paper.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：K242

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 程志;晚唐藩鎮(zhèn)與唐朝滅亡[J];東北師大學報;1988年03期

2 徐洪興,楊月清;試論歐陽修與北宋理學思潮的興起[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);1997年06期

3 吳楓;“兩唐書”說略[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1986年03期

4 霍旭東;干支紀時與古籍整理研究[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1987年03期

5 任爽;新舊《唐書》本紀干支比誤[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1994年03期

6 王玉群;;藩鎮(zhèn)節(jié)度使——唐軍事變革的產物[J];廣州大學學報(社會科學版);2007年11期

7 丁翌;;論春秋書法義例對歐陽修著史的影響[J];濟寧學院學報;2007年04期

8 張孟倫;;關于宋代重修《唐書》的問題[J];蘭州大學學報;1984年03期

9 傅玟;;試論唐代藩鎮(zhèn)割據(jù)形成的原因[J];歷史教學;1965年02期

10 吳浩坤;;談談古代用干支紀年月日的問題[J];歷史教學問題;1981年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 唐鳳霞;《新唐書》的編纂及其學術成就[D];安徽大學;2006年

2 解峰;《新唐書》增傳史料來源研究[D];吉林大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1777283