發(fā)布時間：2018-04-14 08:24

  本文選題：殖民地 + 城市規(guī)劃　； 參考：《浙江大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在世界經(jīng)濟格局全球化的趨勢之下,中國通過“引進來”境外的資本、技術、管理經(jīng)驗,以及文化思想等,在發(fā)展的浪潮中不斷提升綜合國力,已經(jīng)為實施“走出去”戰(zhàn)略奠定了堅實的基礎。近年來,伴隨著我國經(jīng)濟社會的全面開放,不僅中國的企業(yè)走了出去,“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略構想的提出更為中國文化“走出去”創(chuàng)造了良好機遇。然而,無論是“引進來”還是“走出去”,“文化殖民主義”都成為橫亙在中國文化發(fā)展道路上的阻礙。文化殖民思想源于殖民主義階段。殖民時代后期,西方殖民者逐漸放棄以領土制服和武裝霸權進行的殖民主義活動,通過西方中心主義和霸權文化等的文化意識形態(tài)的輸出,實現(xiàn)征服他者的目的,而城市物質空間則是這種文化殖民思想的重要體現(xiàn)之一。其中,文化殖民主義實施力度最高、體現(xiàn)最充分的城市物質空間便是殖民地的規(guī)劃建設。定位為殖民政府政治經(jīng)濟中心的大城市成為宗主國城市規(guī)劃和建筑設計的試驗田,為了彰顯其文化話語權,快速實現(xiàn)統(tǒng)治階層的權力與地位,殖民地規(guī)劃和建筑具有濃厚的文化政治思想。當今,這種文化殖民并未消失,只是以更為隱匿的姿態(tài)進行延續(xù)。筆者借鑒后殖民主義文化批評的方法,通過分析偽滿洲國時期的長春“新京”規(guī)劃、法屬摩洛哥時期的拉巴特和卡薩布蘭卡的城市規(guī)劃和建設,以及法屬阿爾及利亞時期的阿爾及爾炮彈規(guī)劃,以揭示“殖民地”城市物質空間形式與文化殖民的關聯(lián)性。本文旨在認識資本主義文化霸權的內在邏輯,促使我們對當前城市規(guī)劃和城市建設諸多現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的原因保持清醒的認識,一方面通過解構西方霸權話語,判斷在城市和建筑空間中是否暗含文化侵略思想,避免文化“引進來“時的無意識“被殖民”;另一方面,尋求合適的方式構建對外城市建設和文化交流,規(guī)避可預見的問題,避免文化“走出去”時遭遇文化殖民誤讀。
[Abstract]:Under the trend of the globalization of the world economic pattern, China has continuously enhanced its comprehensive national strength in the tide of development through the introduction of overseas capital, technology, management experience, and cultural ideas.Has laid a solid foundation for the implementation of the "going out" strategy.In recent years, with the overall opening of China's economy and society, not only Chinese enterprises have gone out, but also the strategic concept of "Belt and Road" has created a good opportunity for Chinese culture to "go out".However, cultural colonialism has become a hindrance to the development of Chinese culture.The thought of cultural colonization originates from the stage of colonialism.In the late colonial period, Western colonists gradually abandoned the colonial activities carried out by territorial uniforms and armed hegemony, and achieved the goal of conquering others through the export of cultural ideologies such as Western centralism and hegemonic culture.The urban material space is one of the important embodiment of this cultural colonial thought.Among them, cultural colonialism is the most powerful and the most abundant urban material space is the planning and construction of the colony.As the political and economic center of the colonial government, the big city became the experimental field of urban planning and architectural design of the sovereign state. In order to show its cultural right of speech, it quickly realized the power and status of the ruling class.Colonial planning and architecture have strong cultural and political ideas.Today, this culture of colonization has not disappeared, but with a more hidden posture to continue.The author draws lessons from the method of postcolonial cultural criticism, through the analysis of the "new Beijing" plan of Changchun in the period of pseudo-Manchukuo, and the urban planning and construction of Rabat and Casablanca in the period of French Morocco.And the Algiers cannonball program in French Algeria to reveal the relationship between the material space form of the "colony" city and the cultural colonization.The purpose of this paper is to understand the inner logic of capitalist cultural hegemony, and to urge us to keep a clear understanding of the causes of many phenomena in urban planning and urban construction, on the one hand, by deconstructing western hegemonic discourse,To determine whether the idea of cultural aggression is implicit in the city and the architectural space, to avoid the unconscious "colonization" of culture when it is "introduced"; on the other hand, to seek suitable ways to construct foreign urban construction and cultural exchanges in order to avoid foreseeable problems,To avoid cultural "going out" encountered cultural colonial misreading.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：TU984.113

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉亦師;;偽滿“新京”規(guī)劃思想來源研究——兼及城市規(guī)劃思想史探述[J];城市規(guī)劃學刊;2015年04期

2 楊利英;;新時期中國文化“走出去”戰(zhàn)略的意義[J];人民論壇;2014年23期

3 萬雪飛;;后殖民主義:歷史與理論[J];湖南師范大學社會科學學報;2014年01期

4 孫妮;;后殖民理論國內二十年譯介回顧與展望[J];安徽理工大學學報(社會科學版);2014年01期

5 劉亦師;;殖民主義與中國近代建筑史研究的新范式[J];建筑學報;2013年09期

6 趙仕花;;論后殖民主義與后殖民主義文化批評[J];青年文學家;2013年11期

7 楊軍;何邕健;;關于城市規(guī)劃本質的再思考[J];城市;2009年10期

8 段曉丹;楊毅;;批判的失落——90年后中國建筑批評泛社會化現(xiàn)象淺析[J];室內設計;2009年01期

9 王冬梅;;福柯的權利話語與后殖民主義[J];銅仁學院學報;2008年01期

10 張旭鵬;;后殖民主義與歷史研究[J];世界歷史;2006年04期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 隗斌賢;;“一帶一路” 文化先行[N];浙江日報;2016年

，

本文編號：1748458