本文選題：“一帶一路”　切入點(diǎn)：對(duì)外直接投資　出處：《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài)》2017年04期

【摘要】："一帶一路"倡議給我國(guó)企業(yè)"走出去"帶來(lái)新的機(jī)遇。但與"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家的制度鴻溝可能會(huì)阻礙我國(guó)企業(yè)對(duì)這些地區(qū)的對(duì)外直接投資(OFDI)。已有經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究關(guān)于制度距離對(duì)我國(guó)企業(yè)OFDI選址的影響及如何緩解制度距離帶來(lái)的制度風(fēng)險(xiǎn)還未達(dá)成共識(shí)。本文利用2003-2014年我國(guó)對(duì)"一帶一路"沿線65個(gè)國(guó)家的投資數(shù)據(jù),采用負(fù)二項(xiàng)回歸模型,基于制度距離與海外華人網(wǎng)絡(luò)視角的實(shí)證研究發(fā)現(xiàn):第一,正式制度距離對(duì)我國(guó)企業(yè)的OFDI選址具有"非對(duì)稱性效應(yīng)",企業(yè)OFDI傾向于負(fù)向制度距離接近的"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家;第二,我國(guó)企業(yè)對(duì)"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家的OFDI選址表現(xiàn)出對(duì)制度距離的"異質(zhì)性偏好",技術(shù)研發(fā)型OFDI偏好正向制度距離大的國(guó)家,商務(wù)服務(wù)型OFDI和當(dāng)?shù)厣a(chǎn)型OFDI規(guī)避負(fù)向制度距離大的國(guó)家;第三,不論哪種投資動(dòng)機(jī),海外華人網(wǎng)絡(luò)的活躍都能促進(jìn)我國(guó)企業(yè)OFDI。因此,應(yīng)在識(shí)別制度距離的方向和幅度的基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)不同投資動(dòng)機(jī)的OFDI推行差別化的鼓勵(lì)政策和扶持措施,同時(shí)充分利用"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家的海外華人華僑組織,建立東道國(guó)海外華人華僑關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)與海外直接投資聯(lián)結(jié)機(jī)制,推動(dòng)我國(guó)企業(yè)對(duì)"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家直接投資的新發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The "Belt and Road" initiative has brought new opportunities for Chinese enterprises to "go out". But the institutional gap with the countries along the "Belt and Road" may hinder our enterprises' foreign direct investment in these areas. There is no consensus on the influence of institutional distance on OFDI site selection of Chinese enterprises and how to mitigate the institutional risk brought by institutional distance. This paper makes use of the investment data of 65 countries along Belt and Road from 2003 to 2014. Using the negative binomial regression model, the empirical study based on the institutional distance and the perspective of overseas Chinese network found that: first, Formal institutional distance has an "asymmetric effect" on the OFDI location of Chinese enterprises, and the OFDI tends to be a country along the route of "Belt and Road", where the distance is close to the negative institutional distance. Second, Chinese enterprises show heterogeneity preference for OFDI location in countries along "Belt and Road", while technology R & D type OFDI prefer countries with large institutional distance. The commercial service OFDI and the local production type OFDI circumvent the negative system long distance countries; third, no matter what kind of investment motivation, the overseas Chinese network active can promote our country enterprise OFDI.Therefore, On the basis of identifying the direction and extent of the system distance, the OFDI with different investment motives should carry out differential encouragement policies and support measures, and at the same time make full use of the overseas Chinese and overseas Chinese organizations in the countries along the "Belt and Road" line. The establishment of the network of overseas Chinese and overseas Chinese relations in the host country and the linkage mechanism of overseas direct investment will promote the new development of Chinese enterprises' direct investment in the countries along the route of "Belt and Road".
【作者單位】： 暨南大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;暨南大學(xué)中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)略研究中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)的機(jī)制與政策研究”(71333007);國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“基于技術(shù)溢出和吸收能力的本土供應(yīng)商生產(chǎn)率提升研究”(71203077) 中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)外向FDI的學(xué)習(xí)效應(yīng)及其機(jī)制研究”(暨南啟明星計(jì)劃15JNQM001)的資助
【分類號(hào)】：F125

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金仁淑;二戰(zhàn)后日美對(duì)外直接投資戰(zhàn)略比較[J];現(xiàn)代日本經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年03期

2 廖紅;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資存在的問題及對(duì)策[J];廣西經(jīng)貿(mào);2000年09期

3 王家春,仰書綱;淺談發(fā)展中國(guó)家的對(duì)外直接投資[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2000年03期

4 耿廣鴻,王三星;試論戰(zhàn)后日本發(fā)展對(duì)外直接投資特點(diǎn)的演變[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2002年02期

5 肖新華;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資再思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2004年09期

6 陳蔚;對(duì)外直接投資與西部大開發(fā)[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年05期

7 陳曉莉;;論中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2006年17期

8 李，

本文編號(hào)：1672510