【摘要】：厭惡是人類基本的情緒之一，具有防止疾病感染、回避社會弊病的作用。了解厭惡的產生對人們日常生活十分重要。Rozin等人提出的厭惡評估機制解釋了厭惡產生的過程，強調厭惡是一種讓人產生“污染”想法的情緒。 人類學家Douglas提出了禁忌文化，強調人們對骯臟與純潔的判斷，人們本能地害怕被骯臟的事物所污染。骯臟的事物是帶有污染性的，是讓人覺得惡心和討厭的。Douglas又闡述了關于骯臟和分類系統(tǒng)的觀點。人們對于骯臟和純潔的判斷是基于宗教社會的分類系統(tǒng)以及個人的分類行為。Rozin和Douglas都強調“污染”想法是產生厭惡的必要條件。結合兩者觀點，分類行為或者分類傾向是否會對厭惡評估產生影響？ 本研究旨在通過三個實證研究探究分類行為和分類傾向是否會對厭惡評估產生影響。研究一是探索性的相關研究，探究厭惡敏感性與分類傾向之間的相關性，為研究二和研究三做好實證準備。研究二通過實驗啟動的方式，探究不同分類傾向（高分類傾向和低分類傾向）是否會對厭惡評估產生影響。研究三探究分類行為是否會對厭惡評估產生影響。 研究獲得以下主要結論： （1）厭惡敏感性和分類傾向具有很大程度的關聯，說明兩者之間是彼此聯系，相互影響的。 （2）不同的分類傾向對厭惡評估的影響存在顯著性差異。具體而言，高分類傾向的被試厭惡評分高，，低分類傾向的被試厭惡評分低，兩者具有顯著性差異。 （3）分類行為對厭惡評估的影響存在顯著性影響。
[Abstract]:Aversion is one of the basic emotions of human beings. It has the function of preventing disease infection and avoiding social ills. Understanding the emergence of aversion is very important to people's daily lives. Rozin et al.'s aversion assessment mechanism explains the process of aversion, emphasizing that aversion is an emotion that creates "polluting" ideas. Anthropologist Douglas proposed a culture of taboo, emphasizing people's judgment of filth and purity, and instinctive fear of being tainted by dirty things. Filthy things are polluting, disgusting and annoying. Douglas also sets forth the idea of dirty and classified systems. People's judgment of filth and purity is based on the classification system of religious society and the classification of individuals. Rozin and Douglas both emphasize that "pollution" is a necessary condition for aversion. Combined with the two points of view, will classification behavior or classification tendency have an impact on the assessment of aversion? The purpose of this study is to explore whether classification behavior and classification tendency have an impact on aversion assessment through three empirical studies. The first is exploratory related research to explore the correlation between aversion sensitivity and classification tendency, and prepare for the second and third research. The second study explores whether different classification tendencies (high classification tendency and low classification tendency) have an impact on aversion assessment. The third study explores whether classified behavior has an impact on aversion assessment. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the sensitivity of aversion and the tendency to classify are related to each other to a great extent, indicating that the two are interrelated and influenced each other. (2) there were significant differences in the influence of different classification tendencies on aversion assessment. Specifically, the subjects with high classification tendency had higher aversion score, and those with low classification tendency had lower aversion score, there was significant difference between the two groups. (3) the influence of classification behavior on aversion assessment was significant.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 張中學;宋娟;;偏見研究的進展[J];心理與行為研究;2007年02期

2 張瑩瑞;佐斌;;社會認同理論及其發(fā)展[J];心理科學進展;2006年03期

3 閻書昌;;身體潔凈與道德[J];心理科學進展;2011年08期

4 吳寶沛;張雷;;厭惡與道德判斷的關系[J];心理科學進展;2012年02期

本文編號：2455955