【摘要】：厭學(xué),是一種對(duì)教育本質(zhì)否定,消極對(duì)待學(xué)習(xí)的行為和傾向。厭學(xué)問題的出現(xiàn),直接影響了學(xué)生的身心健康、學(xué)業(yè)成就乃至個(gè)人的成長(zhǎng)方向,可謂關(guān)系重大。鑒于厭學(xué)的形成是多種復(fù)雜因素的集合,解決問題的途徑,需要多方面探尋。因此,在厭學(xué)研究上,寬視野、多角度研究方法的運(yùn)用,勢(shì)成必然。本文在已有研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,以厭學(xué)心理為切入點(diǎn),從W市兩所區(qū)位、師資、生員差異顯著的初中學(xué)校中,分層整班抽取了300名學(xué)生作為調(diào)查對(duì)象。采用問卷調(diào)查法,以社會(huì)支持評(píng)定量表、家庭教養(yǎng)方式評(píng)價(jià)量表和中學(xué)生厭學(xué)心理評(píng)價(jià)量表三種量表為研究工具,實(shí)施測(cè)評(píng),并運(yùn)用相關(guān)分析、方差分析、回歸分析等分析方法,深入考察研究社會(huì)支持、家庭教養(yǎng)方式與厭學(xué)三者之間的關(guān)系,以企彌補(bǔ)相關(guān)研究的薄弱,為找尋解決厭學(xué)問題的新思路,提供參考。研究結(jié)果顯示:(1)初中生的厭學(xué)現(xiàn)象較為突出。其厭學(xué)狀況在年級(jí)、生源地、是否留守學(xué)生維度上存在顯著差異,在性別、是否班干部上差異不顯著。(2)初中生的社會(huì)支持水平在年級(jí)、性別、生源地維度上存在顯著差異,在是否班干部、是否留守學(xué)生上差異不顯著。(3)學(xué)生家長(zhǎng)家庭教養(yǎng)方式以積極教養(yǎng)方式為主,在年級(jí)、性別、生源地維度上差異顯著,在是否班干部、是否留守學(xué)生上差異不顯著。(4)初中生所獲良好社會(huì)支持、積極家庭教養(yǎng)方式與厭學(xué)具有較高的、顯著的負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系,消極家庭教養(yǎng)方式與厭學(xué)正相關(guān)。(5)社會(huì)支持、家庭教養(yǎng)方式對(duì)初中生的厭學(xué)心理有顯著預(yù)測(cè)作用。
[Abstract]:Being tired of learning is a kind of behavior and tendency to negate the essence of education and treat learning passively. The emergence of the problem of weariness directly affects students' physical and mental health, academic achievement and even the direction of personal growth. In view of the formation of weariness of learning is a collection of complex factors, the way to solve the problem needs to be explored from many aspects. Therefore, in the study of weariness, wide horizons, multi-angle research methods, potential is inevitable. On the basis of the existing research results, this paper takes the psychology of weariness of learning as the starting point. From two schools in W city, where there are significant differences between teachers and students, 300 students in the whole class are selected as the objects of investigation. Using the questionnaire method, using the social support rating scale, the family upbringing evaluation scale and the middle school students' weariness psychological evaluation scale as the research tool, carries out the evaluation, and uses the correlation analysis, the variance analysis, In order to make up for the weakness of related research and to find a new way to solve the problem of school weariness, the relationship among social support, family upbringing and school weariness is studied by regression analysis. The results show that: (1) the phenomenon of school weariness of junior high school students is more prominent. There are significant differences in the grades, the places of students' origin, whether the students are left behind or not, but there are no significant differences in the gender and class cadres. (2) there are significant differences in the social support level of junior high school students in the dimensions of grade, gender and student origin. There is no significant difference in whether class cadres or students are left behind. (3) the family rearing style of parents of students is mainly positive upbringing style, there are significant differences in the dimensions of grade, sex, student origin, and whether the class cadres, There was no significant difference in whether students left behind. (4) the good social support of junior high school students, the positive family upbringing style and the weariness of study had a high, significant negative correlation, the negative family upbringing style had positive correlation with the weariness of study. (5) Social support. Family upbringing has a significant predictive effect on junior high school students'school weariness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 藍(lán)雪丹;龐從妃;陽秀英;朱碧儀;楊海榮;;家庭教養(yǎng)方式、自律性與大學(xué)生厭學(xué)行為的關(guān)系研究[J];大學(xué)教育;2015年12期

2 陽秀英;文志娟;堯國(guó)靖;何勝;;父母教養(yǎng)方式對(duì)大學(xué)生厭學(xué)行為的影響[J];廣西教育;2015年39期

3 高明;;厭學(xué)問題國(guó)內(nèi)外研究綜述[J];湖北科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年10期

4 陳玉霞;楊海榮;陳桂嫻;;拒絕上學(xué)中學(xué)生家庭教養(yǎng)、生活事件及社會(huì)支持研究[J];教育導(dǎo)刊;2013年04期

5 王一濤;冉云芳;;農(nóng)村留守兒童家庭教育的現(xiàn)狀及社會(huì)干預(yù)[J];繼續(xù)教育研究;2013年02期

6 胡安艷;黃瑩;李燕;陳桂存;;昆明市中學(xué)生父母教養(yǎng)方式與應(yīng)對(duì)方式的關(guān)系[J];中國(guó)學(xué)校衛(wèi)生;2011年05期

7 劉曉;黃希庭;;社會(huì)支持及其對(duì)心理健康的作用機(jī)制[J];心理研究;2010年01期

8 全宏艷;;社會(huì)支持研究綜述[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

9 張麗華;楊麗珠;宋芳;;父母教養(yǎng)方式對(duì)3～9歲兒童自尊的影響[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2006年09期

10 劉彥尊;美國(guó)學(xué)生輟學(xué)問題研究[J];外國(guó)教育研究;2005年09期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 陳雪松;重慶市大學(xué)生厭學(xué)心理的初步研究[D];西南大學(xué);2008年

2 孫蕓;初中生厭學(xué)問題研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2005年

3 龔藝華;父母教養(yǎng)方式問卷的初步編制[D];西南師范大學(xué);2005年

4 譚靜;高中生社會(huì)支持對(duì)心理健康影響的研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2000年

，

本文編號(hào)：2252441