【摘要】：工作同盟一直是咨詢(xún)的過(guò)程與效果研究的重點(diǎn)。臨床研究者們認(rèn)為工作同盟對(duì)咨詢(xún)過(guò)程與效果有至關(guān)重要的作用。工作同盟的相關(guān)研究已有數(shù)十年的歷史,得到了很多指導(dǎo)實(shí)踐的研究結(jié)論,但是其結(jié)構(gòu)不清晰,測(cè)量方式單一,這在一定程度上影響了心理咨詢(xún)過(guò)程-效果的研究。本研究通過(guò)探索工作同盟問(wèn)卷結(jié)構(gòu)的方式確定適合中國(guó)文化的測(cè)量工作同盟的問(wèn)卷,引進(jìn)并驗(yàn)證新的測(cè)量工作同盟的工具,進(jìn)一步明確工作同盟的結(jié)構(gòu)。國(guó)內(nèi)工作同盟的測(cè)量多是直接使用WAI系列的問(wèn)卷。朱旭、江光榮(2011c)的WAQ則立足于中國(guó)實(shí)際,基于對(duì)當(dāng)事人眼中的工作同盟的質(zhì)的研究而編制的工作同盟測(cè)量工具。從邏輯上講,此工具應(yīng)比國(guó)外的工作同盟量表更加符合中國(guó)的文化背景。研究一比較了 WAI-S、WAI-SR以及WAQ的結(jié)構(gòu)效度,得到了 WAQ更適合中國(guó)文化背景且能有效地測(cè)量工作同盟的研究結(jié)論。研究二引入新的測(cè)量工作同盟的工具即操縱桿技術(shù)。操縱桿技術(shù)具有的實(shí)時(shí)、連續(xù)、客觀等特點(diǎn),比傳統(tǒng)的問(wèn)卷式工作同盟測(cè)量有明顯的優(yōu)越性。研究二編制操縱桿評(píng)定工作同盟的手冊(cè)并驗(yàn)證操縱桿根據(jù)評(píng)定手冊(cè)評(píng)定工作同盟的評(píng)定者一致性,結(jié)果表明工作同盟的評(píng)定者一致性較高,都在0.68以上。研究三根據(jù)工作同盟評(píng)定手冊(cè)評(píng)定工作同盟,探索操縱桿測(cè)量工作同盟的可行性,進(jìn)一步明確工作同盟的結(jié)構(gòu),研究結(jié)果表明操縱桿可以用于評(píng)定工作同盟,其信效度良好,并且操縱桿評(píng)定的工作同盟總分與WAQ總分相關(guān)顯著,操縱桿評(píng)定的工作同盟總分與目標(biāo)任務(wù)維度分?jǐn)?shù)能預(yù)測(cè)咨詢(xún)效果。工作同盟包括目標(biāo)任務(wù)、情感聯(lián)接與會(huì)談投入三個(gè)維度。
[Abstract]:The work alliance has always been the focus of the research on the process and effect of consultation. Clinical researchers believe that work alliances play a vital role in the counseling process and effectiveness. The work alliance has been studied for decades, and many conclusions have been obtained, but its structure is not clear and the measurement method is single, which to some extent affects the research of psychological counseling process-effect. By exploring the structure of the work alliance questionnaire, this study determines the questionnaire of the measurement work alliance suitable for Chinese culture, introduces and verifies the new tool of the measurement work alliance, and further clarifies the structure of the work alliance. The measurement of domestic work alliance is to use the questionnaire of WAI series directly. Zhu Xu, Jiang Guang (2011c)'s WAQ is based on the reality of China, based on the qualitative study of the working alliance in the eyes of the party concerned. Logically, this tool is more suited to China's cultural background than the foreign work alliance scale. By comparing the structural validity of WAI-S,WAI-SR and WAQ, the conclusion is drawn that WAQ is more suitable for Chinese cultural background and can effectively measure the work alliance. The second study introduces a new tool of measuring work alliance, that is, joystick technology. The joystick technique has the characteristics of real-time, continuous and objective, which is superior to the traditional questionnaire work alliance measurement. The second study is to compile the manual of evaluating the working alliance of the joystick and to verify the consistency of the evaluator of the work alliance according to the evaluation manual. The result shows that the consistency of the evaluator of the work alliance is higher than 0.68. The third study assesses the work alliance according to the work alliance evaluation manual, explores the feasibility of the joystick measurement work alliance, further clarifies the structure of the work alliance. The research results show that the joystick can be used to evaluate the work alliance, and its reliability and validity are good. And the total score of work alliance evaluated by joystick is significantly correlated with the total score of WAQ, and the total score of work alliance assessed by joystick and the score of goal task dimension can predict the consulting effect. Work alliance includes three dimensions: target task, emotional connection and meeting input.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B849

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 朱旭;胡岳;江光榮;;心理咨詢(xún)中工作同盟的發(fā)展模式與咨詢(xún)效果[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2015年10期

2 胡姝婧;江光榮;;工作同盟和領(lǐng)悟?qū)ψ稍?xún)效果的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2014年06期

3 牛宏偉;江光榮;郝嘉佳;;心理咨詢(xún)中當(dāng)事人工作同盟的發(fā)展及與依戀的關(guān)系[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2013年07期

4 朱旭;江光榮;;工作同盟問(wèn)卷的編制[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

5 朱旭;江光榮;于麗霞;王銘;;工作同盟的結(jié)構(gòu):基于兩種測(cè)量工具的檢驗(yàn)[J];心理科學(xué);2011年04期

6 朱旭;江光榮;;工作同盟的概念[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2011年02期

7 朱旭;江光榮;;當(dāng)事人眼里的工作同盟:質(zhì)的分析[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 朱旭;江光榮;王銘;于麗霞;;兩種工作同盟問(wèn)卷的國(guó)內(nèi)外測(cè)量學(xué)指標(biāo)的對(duì)照[A];第十二屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王銘;會(huì)談中的當(dāng)事人阻抗研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

2 朱旭;咨詢(xún)過(guò)程的深度[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2228397