發(fā)布時間：2018-09-06 14:14

【摘要】：近年來,西方哲學(xué)界興起的實驗哲學(xué)運動常常被視為一場方法論的革命。她開創(chuàng)性地融合了實驗心理學(xué)、認知神經(jīng)科學(xué)、進化論、實驗經(jīng)濟學(xué)等多學(xué)科的研究成果與研究方法,企圖以此為古老的哲學(xué)問題研究帶來新的力量。實驗哲學(xué)雖然受到主流哲學(xué)的批判,但是從她發(fā)展的迅猛之勢可知曉其強大的生命力與競爭力。 理論心理學(xué)一直伴隨著心理科學(xué)的成長與發(fā)展,但是作為一門獨立的分支學(xué)科還是始于二十世紀(jì)六十年代末期,在經(jīng)歷了庫克,‘羅伊斯等學(xué)者對理論心理學(xué)學(xué)科地位合理性的爭取后,直到八九十年代理論心理學(xué)才進入到了一個“理論研究熱潮”時期。進入21世紀(jì)以后,理論心理學(xué)的研究目光更多鎖定在了研究方法的批判和反思,研究宗旨在于“重建科學(xué)方法論基礎(chǔ),為心理學(xué)研究提供新的視角和途徑”(葉浩生,2002)。雖然獲得了不少理論研究成果,但在發(fā)展之余仍然面臨著困境與危機。有些學(xué)者對理論心理學(xué)持有“退回哲學(xué)心理學(xué)思辨舊路”的擔(dān)憂,并質(zhì)疑理論心理學(xué)能否產(chǎn)生實質(zhì)性的研究成果。為了提升理論在心理科學(xué)中的研究地位,心理學(xué)理論工作者們必須探尋出一條兼具合理性與創(chuàng)新性的理論發(fā)展道路。 縱觀當(dāng)前的科學(xué)發(fā)展,正顯現(xiàn)出一種跨學(xué)科的綜合發(fā)展態(tài)勢。同時,彼岸的實驗哲學(xué)也正在通過運用心理學(xué)、認知神經(jīng)科學(xué)的研究成果與手段求得傳統(tǒng)哲學(xué)爭議的新解,許多研究結(jié)果都令哲學(xué)理論爭議煥發(fā)生機。作為心理學(xué)臨近學(xué)科的哲學(xué)正試圖走出一條更具科學(xué)性的研究道路,那么理論心理學(xué)如何從其崛起中獲得科學(xué)創(chuàng)新將是本文論述的重點,也研究意義之所在。 本文以當(dāng)前國外實驗哲學(xué)興起的現(xiàn)狀探討為主線,以史論結(jié)合、文理結(jié)合、宏觀問題梳理與微觀問題分析相結(jié)合的方式,運用文獻分析和理論評述相結(jié)合的辦法,圍繞新千年以后分析哲學(xué)內(nèi)部的哲學(xué)方法反叛現(xiàn)象進行整理分析,并以此為基礎(chǔ)考察哲學(xué)與科學(xué)的融合能夠給心理學(xué)尤其是理論心理學(xué)帶來何種理論發(fā)展上的啟示與借鑒。由實驗哲學(xué)的崛起透視理論心理學(xué)的科學(xué)創(chuàng)新。本文的行文框架主要由兩部分組成：首先,對分析哲學(xué)內(nèi)部的實驗哲學(xué)新支流進行介紹和梳理,總結(jié)歸納其興起的歷史背景、原因、主要研究方法以及具有創(chuàng)新性的研究成果；其次,從其崛起的諸多歷史背景、現(xiàn)實進展和爭論熱點透視理論心理學(xué)如何運用科學(xué)的、客觀的方法實現(xiàn)理論的創(chuàng)新與突破。這一部分將從實體理論和元理論兩個切入點展開論述,并有針對性的對理論心理學(xué)科學(xué)創(chuàng)新的合理路徑加以說明。 “科學(xué)”是各學(xué)科發(fā)展的風(fēng)向標(biāo),無論是以實證經(jīng)驗研究為主的心理學(xué)還是以思辨為主的哲學(xué)都在向“科學(xué)”的方法靠攏。同時,任一學(xué)科的生命力均在于其研究成果的實踐性,并最終體現(xiàn)在學(xué)科的價值層面。在心理科學(xué)內(nèi)部,方法問題和價值問題偏偏構(gòu)成了不可調(diào)和的矛盾,如何化解矛盾是心理學(xué)未來發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵。理論心理學(xué)站在這一矛盾的焦點上,構(gòu)成了學(xué)科研究的困境。走出這一困境的關(guān)鍵是以開放且包容的態(tài)度及多元化的理論視角對學(xué)科未來進路進行探尋與分析。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the experimental philosophical movement in the western philosophical circles has often been regarded as a methodological revolution. She pioneered the integration of experimental psychology, cognitive neuroscience, evolutionism, experimental economics and other research results and methods, in an attempt to bring new strength to the study of ancient philosophical problems. It is criticized by the mainstream philosophy, but its strong vitality and competitiveness can be seen from its rapid development.
Theoretical psychology has always been accompanied by the growth and development of psychological science, but as an independent branch of psychology began in the late 1960s, after Cook,'Royce and other scholars to strive for the rationality of the status of theoretical psychology, until the 1980s and 1990s, proxy psychology did not enter a "theory" After entering the 21st century, the research of theoretical psychology has focused more on the criticism and reflection of research methods, aiming at "rebuilding the basis of scientific methodology and providing a new perspective and approach for psychological research" (Ye Haosheng, 2002). Although many theoretical research results have been obtained, they are still beyond development. Some scholars are worried that theoretical psychology will return to the old way of philosophical psychology and question whether theoretical psychology can produce substantial research results. The development path of new theory.
At the same time, experimental philosophy on the other side is seeking new solutions to traditional philosophical disputes through the use of psychological and cognitive neuroscience research results and means. Many of the research results have revitalized the controversy of philosophical theory. Philosophy is trying to find a more scientific way of research, so how to obtain scientific innovation from the rise of theoretical psychology will be the focus of this paper, but also the significance of research.
Based on the discussion of the current situation of the rise of experimental philosophy in foreign countries, this paper combines history with theory, literature with science, Macro-problems with micro-problems, and combines the methods of literature analysis with theoretical review to sort out and analyze the rebellious phenomena of philosophical methods in analytical philosophy after the new millennium. Based on the study of what kind of inspiration and reference can be brought to the development of psychology, especially theoretical psychology, by the fusion of philosophy and science, this paper explores the scientific innovation of theoretical psychology through the rise of experimental philosophy. This paper summarizes the historical background, reasons, main research methods and innovative research results of its rise. Secondly, from the historical background of its rise, realistic progress and hot debates, we can see how theoretical psychology uses scientific and objective methods to achieve theoretical innovation and breakthroughs. Discusses the two breakthrough points of theory and meta-theory, and explains the reasonable path of scientific innovation of theoretical psychology.
"Science" is the vane of the development of various disciplines. Psychology based on empirical research and philosophy based on speculation are all approaching to the "scientific" method. Meanwhile, the vitality of any discipline lies in the practicality of its research results, and ultimately embodies in the value of the discipline. How to resolve the contradiction is the key to the future development of psychology. Theoretical psychology stands at the focal point of this contradiction and constitutes the dilemma of discipline research. The key to get out of this dilemma is to explore the future path of discipline with an open and inclusive attitude and a pluralistic theoretical perspective. Search and analysis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B84-0

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉翔平;心理學(xué)中的因果決定論和自由意志論[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年05期

2 柳海濤;萬小龍;;由認知科學(xué)前沿看科技與人文之關(guān)系[J];重慶交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年01期

3 麻彥坤;當(dāng)代心理學(xué)文化轉(zhuǎn)向的動因及其方法論意義[J];國外社會科學(xué);2004年01期

4 王波;;批判立場的理論心理學(xué)——與托馬斯·梯歐教授一席談[J];國外社會科學(xué);2011年05期

5 葛魯嘉;;科學(xué)形態(tài)的心理學(xué)議評——心理學(xué)的五種歷史形態(tài)考察之五[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(教育科學(xué)版);2005年04期

6 周寧,葛魯嘉;常識話語形態(tài)的心理學(xué)[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年01期

7 張Sh;;從現(xiàn)象學(xué)方法看直覺在科學(xué)研究中的認知作用[J];淮陰師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

8 劉毅;;當(dāng)代心理學(xué)觀照下的自由意志問題[J];南京師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年06期

9 許波;鐘暗華;;進化心理學(xué)和文化心理學(xué)的對立[J];心理研究;2009年03期

10 葉浩生;;當(dāng)代心理學(xué)的分裂與學(xué)科的多元化整合[J];社會科學(xué);2011年07期

，

本文編號：2226599