人際責任與疼痛共情的關系探究
[Abstract]:The term empathy has shown many meanings since it appeared in the literature. A more uniform definition is the ability to think about others' thoughts, feelings, and actions. The resulting pain empathy is thought to be the perception, experience, and emotional response caused by pain to others, that is, empathy for the pain of others. Pain empathy plays an indispensable and positive role in both individual survival and interpersonal communication. There are many factors affecting pain empathy, among which personality factor is an important factor, but the relationship between personality and pain empathy needs to be further explored. In this study, an important trait of self-supporting personality, interpersonal responsibility, is chosen to explore the relationship between personality and empathy. Interpersonal responsibility refers to loyalty and trust, which embodies the characteristics of Chinese culture. This study assumes that interpersonal responsibility is associated with pain empathy and that this relationship is influenced by situational factors. In the situation of high degree of self-involvement and vivid image of injury imagination, the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy is higher; in the situation where the degree of self-involvement is relatively low, the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy is higher, while in the situation of relatively low degree of self-involvement, the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy is higher. Interpersonal responsibility scores are low or may not be associated with pain empathy. In experiment one, participants were asked to observe pictures of pain in other people's body parts and assess their pain levels, and in the course of the observation, they said to themselves, "I caused the injury to him or her." At the same time, vividly visualize the specific situation that caused the person to be hurt in the picture, so as to explore the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy in the situation of injury imagination. A total of 113 subjects, including 85 girls and 28 boys. Participants were asked to fill out a college student interpersonal support scale (ISSS-US), then observe the pictures and assess the pain level of the characters in the pictures. The experimental results were as follows: operation group (no injury imagination situation) and experimental group (injury imagination situation). The results showed that the main effect of injury imagination was significant, the main effect of interpersonal responsibility was not significant, the interaction between injury imagination and interpersonal responsibility was significant, that is, in the situation of injury imagination, the subjects' pain empathy level was higher; The high interpersonal responsibility group had a higher level of pain empathy than the low score group only in the context of injury imagination. Experiment two asked people to look at pictures of other people's facial pain expressions and assess their pain levels, and in the course of the observation assumed that those students who had been punished by the subjects had facial expressions when they were subjected to electrical stimulation. In order to explore the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy in the injury hypothesis. A total of 106 subjects, including 81 girls and 25 boys. Participants were asked to fill out a college student interpersonal support scale (ISSS-US), then observe the pictures and assess the pain level of the characters in the pictures. The experimental results were as follows: operation group (no injury hypothetical situation) and experimental group (injury hypothesis situation). The results showed that the main effect and interaction of interpersonal responsibility were not significant in the injury hypothesis. The results support the hypothesis that interpersonal responsibility is related to pain empathy, but this relationship mainly occurs in the context of high degree of self involvement. This study has some contributions to promote the relationship between personality and pain empathy and its influencing factors, but there are still some shortcomings.
【學位授予單位】:西南大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:B848
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張偉;丁鳳琴;;大學生內(nèi)隱助人態(tài)度的情境效應[J];重慶與世界(學術版);2014年04期
2 顧毅;龐萍;;翻譯教學中的翻譯情境意識(英文)[J];Teaching English in China;2002年03期
3 黃濤;論語言民俗情境的構成與功能[J];北京師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2000年04期
4 鄭信軍;動機與情境對不同自控水平兒童學業(yè)求助的影響[J];心理科學;2000年01期
5 楊渝玲;情境因素——經(jīng)濟學分析之要件——當代西方經(jīng)濟學方法論研究的哲學審視[J];嘉應學院學報;2005年04期
6 朱秋飛;何貴兵;;傳統(tǒng)美德認同和責任情境對大學生責任行為傾向的影響[J];應用心理學;2011年01期
7 萬文濤;品德結構新探[J];江西社會科學;2004年04期
8 閆志英;盧家楣;;移情反應的研究——基于個體傾向與情境的雙重視角[J];心理科學;2012年06期
9 海春花;;交流意愿成因發(fā)展研究:從持久之個性特質到動態(tài)之情境因素[J];陜西教育(高教版);2013年Z2期
10 何梟賢;;以情境為依托 以創(chuàng)新促會學——情境因素在學生學會學習英語課題中的應用[J];文教資料;2006年21期
相關會議論文 前2條
1 田立新;羅品一;;鑄造情境培養(yǎng)表達[A];增強自主創(chuàng)新能力 促進吉林經(jīng)濟發(fā)展——啟明杯·吉林省第四屆科學技術學術年會論文集(下冊)[C];2006年
2 江根源;;網(wǎng)絡社區(qū)中的隱私關注與其互動情境間的作用關系[A];“傳播與中國·復旦論壇”(2013)——網(wǎng)絡化關系:新傳播與當下中國論文集[C];2013年
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 吳燕 杭州師范大學教育科學學院心理系;分攤損失比分享收益更應注重分配公平[N];中國社會科學報;2012年
相關博士學位論文 前2條
1 呂林;情境感知通信的計算機免疫方法研究[D];武漢大學;2012年
2 張劍 ;影響員工創(chuàng)造性績效的組織情境因素及動機機制研究[D];首都師范大學;2003年
相關碩士學位論文 前10條
1 高晶晶;跨情境下青少年慈善捐助歸因的特點及其影響機制[D];寧夏大學;2015年
2 張宇馳;求偶相關情境對面孔學習時間分配的影響[D];浙江師范大學;2015年
3 代濤濤;對人知覺和評價中的內(nèi)容偏好及情境效應[D];華中師范大學;2015年
4 姚瑤;負性情緒與聽覺注意分散對電廠操作員情境意識的影響[D];陜西師范大學;2015年
5 趙建波;基于知識情境的知識推送技術研究[D];南昌大學;2015年
6 許慧;情境因素對消費者在線沖動購買影響的實證分析[D];湘潭大學;2015年
7 張建麗;職業(yè)選拔情境中人格測量的qIAT技術應用探索[D];西北師范大學;2015年
8 阮盼;情境預防在我國城市社區(qū)治安防控的應用研究[D];華東政法大學;2016年
9 高熙鴿;情境預防理論視域下的基層腐敗治理研究[D];吉林大學;2016年
10 朱芊里;人際責任與疼痛共情的關系探究[D];西南大學;2016年
,本文編號:2218557
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2218557.html