【摘要】：目的描述安徽省青少年謀害他人心理行為的流行特征,探討青少年生長(zhǎng)發(fā)育歷程中童年期不良經(jīng)歷對(duì)青少年謀害他人心理行為的影響。方法分別從安徽省皖南、皖北、皖中每個(gè)片區(qū)選取1所普通初級(jí)中學(xué)和1所普通高級(jí)中學(xué),每所學(xué)校每個(gè)年級(jí)各調(diào)查約320人(男女各半),共對(duì)5 726名初一~高三學(xué)生,使用自編“安徽省青少年健康情況調(diào)查問(wèn)卷”,采用橫斷面調(diào)查方式,調(diào)查青少年在最近6個(gè)月的謀害心理行為發(fā)生情況,同時(shí)調(diào)查青少年一般情況與童年期不良經(jīng)歷發(fā)生情況等。結(jié)果5 726名中學(xué)生最近6個(gè)月有過(guò)謀害意念、謀害計(jì)劃、謀害準(zhǔn)備、謀害未遂4種謀害他人心理行為的報(bào)告率分別為9.9%,2.8%,1.3%,0.6%。不同性別、不同年級(jí)、不同朋友數(shù)量、不同自評(píng)相貌的青少年學(xué)生4種謀害心理行為報(bào)告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值均0.001);與父母關(guān)系較差的學(xué)生更容易產(chǎn)生謀害意念和謀害計(jì)劃,自評(píng)學(xué)習(xí)成績(jī)較差的學(xué)生更容易產(chǎn)生謀害意念、謀害計(jì)劃和謀害準(zhǔn)備,差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值均0.001)。童年期各種不良經(jīng)歷在男女生間差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值均0.001)。童年期不同被欺凌經(jīng)歷(言語(yǔ)欺凌、關(guān)系欺凌、軀體欺凌)的青少年4種謀害他人心理行為(謀害意念、謀害計(jì)劃、謀害準(zhǔn)備、謀害未遂)報(bào)告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值均0.001)。各種類型的童年期被欺凌經(jīng)歷(言語(yǔ)欺凌、關(guān)系欺凌、軀體欺凌)均為青少年4種謀害他人心理行為的危險(xiǎn)因素(P值均0.05)。童年期不同虐待與忽視經(jīng)歷(軀體虐待、情感虐待、性虐待、情感忽視、軀體忽視)的青少年4種謀害他人心理行為的報(bào)告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值均0.001)。各種類型童年期虐待與忽視經(jīng)歷(軀體虐待、情感虐待、性虐待、情感忽視、軀體忽視)均為青少年4種謀害他人心理行為的危險(xiǎn)因素(P值均0.05)。童年期不同親子分離情況的青少年謀害未遂報(bào)告率差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),童年期與母親分離為青少年謀害未遂的危險(xiǎn)因素(P0.05)。童年期遭遇不同家庭不良生活事件的青少年4種謀害他人心理行為報(bào)告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值均0.05),童年期遭遇不同學(xué)校不良生活事件的青少年謀害意念、謀害計(jì)劃、謀害準(zhǔn)備報(bào)告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值均0.05)。童年期遭遇來(lái)自家庭1~2種及3種以上不良生活事件是青少年謀害意念的危險(xiǎn)因素,童年期家庭不良生活事件發(fā)生3種以上是青少年謀害未遂的危險(xiǎn)因素,童年期學(xué)校不良生活事件發(fā)生4種及以上為謀害意念、謀害計(jì)劃和謀害準(zhǔn)備的危險(xiǎn)因素(P值均0.05)。分別將青少年謀害意念、謀害計(jì)劃、謀害準(zhǔn)備和謀害未遂作為結(jié)局變量(因變量),將童年期虐待與忽視、童年期被欺凌情況、童年期親子分離、童年期不良生活事件同時(shí)作為自變量,并將影響青少年謀害心理行為的人口學(xué)特征變量作為控制變量進(jìn)行多因素回歸分析,結(jié)果顯示童年期情感虐待、性虐待、被同伴欺凌經(jīng)歷(軀體、言語(yǔ)、關(guān)系)、經(jīng)歷過(guò)4種及以上學(xué)校不良生活事件均為青少年謀害意念的危險(xiǎn)因素(P值均0.05);童年期性虐待、情感忽視、被同伴軀體欺凌均為青少年謀害計(jì)劃的危險(xiǎn)因素(P值均0.05);童年期被軀體欺凌為青少年謀害準(zhǔn)備的危險(xiǎn)因素(P值0.05);童年期性虐待與軀體忽視均為青少年謀害未遂的危險(xiǎn)因素(P值均0.05)。結(jié)論青少年謀害他人心理行為現(xiàn)象較為嚴(yán)重,應(yīng)引起人們普遍關(guān)注。青少年謀害他人心理行為在不同人口特征上存在一定差異,童年期被欺凌經(jīng)歷、童年期虐待與忽視經(jīng)歷、童年期親子分離經(jīng)歷及童年期來(lái)自家庭及學(xué)校不良生活事件都是造成青少年時(shí)期謀害他人心理行為的重要危險(xiǎn)因素,應(yīng)有針對(duì)性采取相應(yīng)干預(yù)措施。
[Abstract]:Objective to describe the epidemiological characteristics of the psychological behavior of young people in Anhui Province, and to explore the effects of childhood bad experiences on the psychological behavior of young people during their growth and development. Methods 1 ordinary primary schools and 1 ordinary high schools were selected from each area of Southern Anhui, Northern Anhui and Anhui Province, each school was selected. About 320 students (half and half of men and women) in each grade and 5726 junior high school students were used to investigate the psychological behavior of teenagers in the last 6 months by using a cross-sectional survey to investigate the occurrence of psychological behavior of adolescents in the last 6 months. At the same time, the general situation of teenagers and the occurrence of bad experiences in childhood were investigated. Results in the last 6 months, 5726 middle school students have had an idea of ploy, plan for murder, prepare for harm, and 4 kinds of reports of attempted harm to others' psychological behavior, respectively, 9.9%, 2.8%, 1.3%, 0.6%., different sexes, different grades, different numbers of friends, and the difference of psychological behavior reporting rates among 4 young students with different looks. Learning significance (P value was 0.001); students with poor relationship with parents were more likely to produce harm intention and plan for harm. Students with poor academic performance were more likely to produce harm ideas, plan and prepare for harm. The difference was statistically significant (P value was 0.001). All kinds of bad experiences in childhood were statistically significant between men and women. The significance (P value was 0.001). 4 adolescents who were bullying and bullying in childhood (verbal bullying, bullying and physical bullying) had statistically significant differences in reporting rates (P values of 0.001). Bullying and physical bullying were 4 risk factors for adolescents' psychological behavior (P value was 0.05). There were 4 different reporting rates (P values, 0.001) of juvenile abuse and neglect in childhood (physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, physical neglect). All kinds of differences were statistically significant (0.001). Childhood abuse and neglect (physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, physical neglect) were 4 risk factors for adolescents' psychological behavior (P values were all 0.05). The difference in reported rate of attempted juvenile murder with different parental separation in childhood was statistically significant (P0.05), and childhood and mother were separated as green. The risk factors of attempted juvenile Ploy (P0.05). 4 young people who suffered from different family life events in childhood were statistically significant (P, 0.05), and the adolescents who suffered from different school life events in their childhood had their intention to plot harm, plan for harm, and the difference of preparation reporting rates were all of the difference. Statistical significance (P value is 0.05). Childhood experience from family 1~2 species and more than 3 kinds of bad life events are risk factors for teenagers to plot their ideas, and 3 kinds of bad life events in childhood are the risk factors for young people to commit suicide, and 4 kinds of unhealthy life events in childhood school are the idea of ploy to plot harm. The risk factors of planning and preparing for harm (P value are all 0.05). The young people are trying to plot their ideas, make plans for harm, prepare for harm and attempt to commit suicide as outcome variables (due to variables), the childhood abuse and neglect, childhood bullying, childhood parent-child separation, childhood ungood life events simultaneously as independent variables, and will affect young people to make harm. The demographic variable of psychological behavior was used as a control variable to carry out multiple factors regression analysis. The results showed that childhood emotional abuse, sexual abuse, peer bullying experience (body, speech, relationship), and 4 or more bad life events in school were all risk factors for teenagers to plot their ideas (P value is 0.05); childhood sexual abuse, emotion Neglecting and being bullied by the body were all the risk factors (P value of 0.05) for young people, and the risk factors (P value 0.05) of physical bullying in childhood, and sexual abuse and physical neglect in childhood (P 0.05). There is a serious concern. There are certain differences in the psychological behavior of young people in different demographic characteristics, childhood bullying experience, childhood abuse and neglect experience, childhood parent-child separation experience and childhood from family and school bad life events are the psychological behavior of young people. Important risk factors should be targeted to take corresponding intervention measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姚偉;兒童是自然的存在[J];學(xué)前教育研究;2005年Z1期

2 葉青;陶芳標(biāo);方東升;黃錕;孫瑩;;童年期虐待與青少年不良飲食心理行為的研究[J];中華流行病學(xué)雜志;2006年04期

3 陳小燕;;她為何徘徊?——不可忽視的童年期影響[J];大眾心理學(xué);2005年07期

4 林琳琳;;童年期遺忘及其消退機(jī)制研究概述[J];中國(guó)電力教育;2009年03期

5 安芹;賈曉明;李波;;中學(xué)生童年期創(chuàng)傷經(jīng)驗(yàn)與自尊、主觀幸福感的關(guān)系[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2009年08期

6 姚桂英;杜愛(ài)玲;楊世昌;高紅麗;馬仁娥;閆春平;;人格在大學(xué)生童年期精神虐待與當(dāng)前抑郁癥狀之間的中介作用[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2011年01期

7 倪巖娟;趙冰潔;;大學(xué)生成人依戀與童年期經(jīng)歷的關(guān)系研究[J];重慶三峽學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

8 林琳琳;秦金亮;;童年期遺忘消退機(jī)制的幾種解釋[J];幼兒教育;2009年12期

9 年晶;;進(jìn)化觀下的童年期延長(zhǎng)與現(xiàn)實(shí)困境[J];少年兒童研究;2009年18期

10 劉敬華;童年期教育淺談[J];黑河教育;2004年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前5條

1 林琳琳;袁中興;;童年期遺忘產(chǎn)生及消退機(jī)制的研究綜述[A];第十一屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2007年

2 位照國(guó);陸邵佳;吳韋瑋;廖梅;李衛(wèi)暉;李則宣;劉鐵榜;李凌江;;童年期創(chuàng)傷影響成年抑郁表達(dá)的中間機(jī)制[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十次全國(guó)精神醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2012年

3 李先賓;劉金同;王傳躍;;青少年虐待狀況及其對(duì)人格的影響[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十次全國(guó)精神醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2012年

4 陳晶琦;廖巍;;北京市430名高中生童年期羞辱經(jīng)歷及其與心理健康的關(guān)聯(lián)[A];中華預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)兒少衛(wèi)生分會(huì)第九屆學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)、中國(guó)教育學(xué)會(huì)體育與衛(wèi)生分會(huì)第一屆學(xué)校衛(wèi)生學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)、中國(guó)健康促進(jìn)與教育協(xié)會(huì)學(xué)校分會(huì)第三屆學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

5 張文新;周宗奎;;童年期至青少年期的同伴侵害與欺負(fù):適應(yīng)結(jié)果與相關(guān)因素[A];增強(qiáng)心理學(xué)服務(wù)社會(huì)的意識(shí)和功能——中國(guó)心理學(xué)會(huì)成立90周年紀(jì)念大會(huì)暨第十四屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 雍年 李永和 張燕華;呵護(hù)孩子的童年期[N];保定日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

2 本報(bào)記者 謝苗楓 程滿清 胡鍵 徐林 通訊員 焦亞瓊;暴力與愛(ài)等同導(dǎo)致過(guò)半孩子挨打[N];南方日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

3 樊發(fā)稼 作者系中國(guó)社科院文學(xué)所研究員;兒童文學(xué)生態(tài)及其他[N];文藝報(bào);2005年

4 楊桂青;網(wǎng)絡(luò)成癮機(jī)制的五個(gè)理論支撐[N];中國(guó)教育報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 刁鵬飛;童年期創(chuàng)傷與心理防御機(jī)制的關(guān)系及繪畫(huà)療法干預(yù)研究[D];云南師范大學(xué);2015年

2 元帥;童年期被忽視個(gè)體注意偏向的ERP研究[D];新鄉(xiāng)醫(yī)學(xué)院;2015年

3 胡國(guó)云;《童年期慢性應(yīng)激評(píng)定量表》的編制及其信效度評(píng)價(jià)[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2016年

4 閆景蕾;童年創(chuàng)傷對(duì)大學(xué)生戀愛(ài)滿意度的影響：自尊與感知伴侶應(yīng)答的序列中介作用[D];武漢體育學(xué)院;2017年

5 葉青;童年期虐待經(jīng)歷與青少年不良飲食心理行為的研究[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2006年

6 倪巖娟;大學(xué)生成人依戀與童年期創(chuàng)傷經(jīng)歷的關(guān)系研究和個(gè)案干預(yù)[D];漳州師范學(xué)院;2012年

7 孫蓓;童年期遺忘的邊界年齡的探討[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2012年

8 肖亞男;童年期虐待經(jīng)歷與青少年自我傷害行為的研究[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2009年

9 左俊楠;哲學(xué)人類學(xué)視野下童年期意義研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年

10 何冬梅;童年期心理虐待對(duì)大學(xué)生自尊和自卑的影響[D];哈爾濱師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2136132