本文選題：意義維持模型 + 流動補償��； 參考：《浙江大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：意義維持模型認為,由于新經(jīng)驗的事實與個體基于既有信念形成的預期出現(xiàn)沖突,個體便體驗到意義違背,并驅(qū)使個體采取自我調(diào)節(jié)策略緩解這種意義違背。本研究試圖從道德領域入手,著眼于流動補償?shù)目隙ㄐ?通過四項實驗研究,探討意義違背誘發(fā)的道德信念肯定效應及其心理機制。研究一包含2項實驗,探討意義違背誘發(fā)的道德信念肯定效應。實驗一分別以道德判斷、道德規(guī)范遵守意愿為因變量,探討意義違背操縱對道德判斷嚴厲性、道德規(guī)范遵守意愿的影響。實驗一證實,意義違背操縱后,被試將表現(xiàn)出更高水平的道德信念肯定行為,包括將道德行為判斷為更道德,將不道德行為判斷為更不道德,以及更高水平的道德規(guī)范遵守意愿。實驗二以道德關(guān)注為因變量,探討意義違背操縱對道德關(guān)注的廣度、深度的影響。實驗二發(fā)現(xiàn),意義違背操縱后,被試道德關(guān)注的深度顯著提高,但未發(fā)現(xiàn)道德關(guān)注廣度的顯著差異。研究二包含1項實驗,探討既有道德信念在意義違背與道德信念肯定關(guān)系中的調(diào)節(jié)作用。實驗三發(fā)現(xiàn),對于“關(guān)愛/傷害”道德基礎認同水平高、但“公平/欺騙”道德基礎認同水平低的被試,意義違背操縱可以顯著負向預測被試基于“關(guān)愛/傷害”道德基礎的道德判斷;對于“關(guān)愛/傷害”道德基礎認同水平低、但“公平/欺騙”道德基礎認同水平高的被試,意義違背操縱可以顯著正向預測被試基于“公平/欺騙”道德基礎的道德判斷。研究三包含1項實驗,探討意義維持動機作為意義違背導致道德信念肯定效應的中介機制。實驗四證實,意義違背操縱后,基于道德視角的行為評價會更嚴厲、更迅速,而基于個人視角的行為評價任務中則不存在此效應。同時,意義維持動機可以作為意義違背導致道德信念肯定效應的中介機制;意義違背操縱導致更高水平的意義維持動機,并導致后續(xù)行為評價任務中的道德信念肯定效應。以上四項實驗研究證明,意義違背可以引發(fā)道德信念肯定效應,個體通過道德信念的肯定實現(xiàn)意義的流動補償。個體的既有道德信念對上述過程起到調(diào)節(jié)作用,并且該過程是通過意義維持動機的中介作用實現(xiàn)的。此外,還進一步討論了本研究的價值、不足及未來發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:The meaning maintenance model holds that, because of the conflict between the facts of the new experience and the expectation of the individual based on the formation of existing beliefs, the individual can experience the violation of meaning and drive the individual to take the self-regulation strategy to alleviate the violation. This study tries to study the positive effect of the flow compensation from the moral field and through four experimental studies, This paper discusses the positive effect of moral belief and its psychological mechanism induced by meaning violation. The study includes 2 experiments to explore the positive effect of moral belief that is violated by meaning. Experiment one confirms that after the meaning goes against manipulation, the subjects will show a higher level of moral belief, including the judgment of moral behavior as more moral, the judgment of immoral behavior as more immoral, and the higher level of moral norms. Experiment two found that the depth of moral concern was significantly increased after the meaning was violated, but the significant difference in the extent of moral concern was not found. Study two included 1 experiments to explore the regulatory role of moral beliefs in the relationship between moral convictions and moral beliefs. Experiment three found that "care / harm" was "love / harm". "The moral foundation identification level is high, but the" fair / deceit "moral basic identification level of the low level of the subjects, meaning contrary to the manipulation can significantly negative prediction based on the moral basis of" care / harm "moral basis; for" care / harm "moral basis of the low level of identification, but the" fair / deceit "moral basis of high level of identification is high Trial, meaning breach of manipulation can significantly forward predictive moral judgment based on the moral basis of "fairness / deception". Study three contains 1 experiments to explore the intermediary mechanism of meaning maintenance motivation as the positive effect of moral belief. Experiment four confirms that the moral perspective of behavior evaluation will be stricter after the meaning is contrary to manipulation. The effect does not exist in the individual perspective based behavior evaluation task. At the same time, the meaning maintenance motivation can be used as the intermediary mechanism of meaning violation that leads to the positive effect of moral belief; meaning violation leads to higher level of meaning maintenance motivation and leads to the affirmative effect of moral belief in the evaluation task of follow-up behavior. The above four experimental studies have proved that the breach of meaning can lead to the positive effect of moral belief, and the individual's moral belief is the flow compensation for the affirmative realization of the meaning. The individual's moral belief has a regulating effect on the process, and the process is realized through the intermediary role of meaning maintenance motivation. The value of this study, the lack of future development direction.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王玨;吳明證;孫曉玲;;道德失調(diào)的自我調(diào)節(jié)策略[J];心理科學;2016年06期

2 劉艷麗;陸桂芝;劉勇;;結(jié)構(gòu)需求:概念、測量及與相關(guān)變量的關(guān)系[J];心理科學進展;2016年02期

3 左世江;黃旎雯;王芳;蔡攀;;意義維持模型:理論發(fā)展與研究挑戰(zhàn)[J];心理科學進展;2016年01期

4 凌虹;陸愛桃;連松洲;李文桃;蘇丹曉;;不同情緒對認知失調(diào)沖突的影響研究[J];心理研究;2015年02期

5 張宏偉;李曄;;兩種道德自我調(diào)節(jié)機制下的道德行為[J];心理科學進展;2014年07期

6 何W，

本文編號：1946770