本文選題：合作行為 + 自我建構��； 參考：《曲阜師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：當人們遇到集體利益和個人利益發(fā)生矛盾沖突時,如何協調兩者之間的關系,是在當前競爭日益激烈的環(huán)境下,人們經常需要面對的兩難問題情境。對于大學生來說,不論是在獨特的宿舍文化還是在科研合作等方面,都需要在集體和個體利益間做出有效權衡,同樣需要應對各種各樣的兩難問題。研究大學生決策的影響因素,有利于指導大學生做出正確的決策選擇,同時也有利于引導其形成更為成熟的社會交往模式。自我建構不同的個體對于合作行為選擇并不一致,而且有研究發(fā)現自我建構與解釋水平對合作有重要的影響。但一般都是分別對二者進行研究,沒有關于其交互作用的分析,而且在不同反饋方式下探討這兩個因素對合作的影響的研究,目前來說還非常少。本研究試圖從自我建構與解釋水平角度探討社會兩難情境中個體的合作行為,特別是不同反饋條件下的自我建構和解釋水平對個體合作行為產生的影響。本研究以社會兩難問題研究中的公共物品兩難實驗范式作為任務情境,運用問卷和實驗室實驗相結合的方法,以大學生為實驗被試,采用2×2的被試間實驗設計,對自我建構類型以及解釋水平兩個因素來進行研究,并探討其在不同反饋方式下的合作傾向。通過對實驗數據的統計分析,得出的研究結論如下:1.自我建構類型對合作行為的主效應顯著。社會兩難情境下,自我建構類型對于個體的合作行為的影響存在差異。相對于獨立型自我建構的個體來說,依存型自我建構的個體有更多的合作行為。2.反饋方式對合作行為的主效應顯著。社會兩難情境下,不同的信息反饋方式對于個體的合作行為的影響不同。在集體反饋方式下個體的合作行為顯著高于在個人反饋方式下的個體。3.自我建構與反饋方式存在交互作用:依存型自我建構的個體受反饋方式的影響不大;而獨立型自我建構的個體易受反饋方式影響,個人反饋方式下的獨立型自我建構的個體的競爭傾向更明顯。4.解釋水平對合作行為的主效應顯著,在社會兩難的情境下,解釋水平高的個體比解釋水平低的個體有更高的合作傾向。5.解釋水平與反饋方式不存在交互作用。6.自我建構與解釋水平存在交互作用:依存型自我建構的個體無論在高解釋水平還是低解釋水平啟動下其合作行為都較高,其差異不顯著;獨立型自我建構的個體在高解釋水平啟動下也有較高的合作行為,但在低解釋水平啟動下其合作行為傾向則較低。
[Abstract]:When people encounter conflicts between collective and personal interests, how to coordinate their relationship is a dilemma that people often need to face under the increasingly fierce competition environment. For college students, both in the unique dormitory culture and in scientific research cooperation, they all need to be in the collective and the other. An effective trade-off between the interests of the body is also required to deal with a variety of dilemma. The study of the influencing factors of College Students' decision-making is conducive to guiding college students to make a correct decision and to guide them to form a more mature mode of social communication. And some studies have found that the level of self construction and interpretation has an important impact on cooperation. However, it is generally studied separately for the two, and there is no analysis of its interaction, and the study of the impact of the two factors on cooperation under different feedback methods is still very few. This study tries to construct and explain itself from the self construction. A study of the individual cooperative behavior in a social dilemma, especially the impact of the level of self construction and interpretation on the individual cooperative behavior under different feedback conditions. This study uses the paradigm of the public goods dilemma in the study of social dilemma as a task situation, and the method of combining questionnaires and laboratory experiments. Taking the college students as experimental subjects, the 2 x 2 experimental design was used to study the type of self construction and the two factors of the interpretation level, and to explore the cooperation tendency under different feedback methods. Through the statistical analysis of the experimental data, the conclusions are as follows: 1. the main effect of the type of self construction on the cooperative behavior is obvious. Under the situation of social dilemma, there are differences in the effect of self construction type on individual cooperative behavior. Relative to independent self constructed individuals, dependent self constructed individuals have more cooperative behavior and.2. feedback is significant to the main effect of cooperative behavior. In the two difficult situation of society, different ways of information feedback are used. The individual's cooperative behavior has different effects. In the way of collective feedback, the individual's cooperative behavior is significantly higher than that of the individual.3. self construction and feedback in the individual feedback mode: the independent self constructed individual is not influenced by the feedback mode; and the individual self constructed individual is susceptible to the feedback mode. The competitive tendency of individual self constructed individuals under the mode of human feedback is more obvious that the main effect of.4. interpretation level on cooperative behavior is significant. In the situation of social dilemma, the individuals with high level of interpretation have higher cooperative tendency than those with low level of interpretation, and there is no interaction effect of.6. self construction and solution on the.5. interpretation level and the way of feedback. The independent self constructed individuals have higher cooperation behavior regardless of the high interpretation level or low interpretation level, and their differences are not significant. Independent self constructed individuals also have higher cooperative behavior under the high interpretation level, but their cooperative behavior tends to be better under the low interpretation level. Low.

【學位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B844.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 郭慶科;許樹芳;;公共物品投資博弈中自我構念與反饋方式對合作的影響[J];山東理工大學學報(社會科學版);2015年02期

2 黃俊;李曄;張宏偉;;解釋水平理論的應用及發(fā)展[J];心理科學進展;2015年01期

3 王振華;柴俊武;張倩;;群體購買情境下沖動性購買影響研究:解釋水平視角[J];應用心理學;2014年02期

4 王財玉;何安明;惠秋平;;時間距離與大學生自我-品牌聯結的價值偏好——解釋水平的視角[J];心理科學;2013年04期

5 馬偉軍;馮睿;;中國大學生的自我建構、利己歸因偏好與自我增強[J];心理科學;2012年06期

6 孫曉玲;李曉文;;自我提高還是自我增強? 解釋水平理論的觀點[J];心理科學;2012年02期

7 姚卿;陳榮;趙平;;自我構念對想象廣告策略的影響與分析[J];心理學報;2011年06期

8 曹華英;張林;;大學生的自我構念與動機定向關系研究[J];心理學探新;2010年01期

9 王沛;汲慧麗;;社會價值取向與反饋對動態(tài)社會兩難決策的影響:以水資源兩難決策為例[J];心理與行為研究;2009年02期

10 王裕豪;袁慶華;徐琴美;;自我建構量表(SCS)中文版的初步試用[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2008年06期

，

本文編號：1867100