本文選題：道德　切入點：法律　出處：《心理科學(xué)》2015年04期

【摘要】：在"執(zhí)行者"和"旁觀者"兩個情境中,通過操縱當(dāng)事人的信念和事件結(jié)果,考察了被試的道德與法律責(zé)任判斷。結(jié)果顯示:進行道德責(zé)任判斷時,被試對當(dāng)事人的信念信息更敏感;進行法律責(zé)任判斷時,則對事件結(jié)果的信息更敏感。"執(zhí)行者"情境中的道德和法律責(zé)任評分均高于"旁觀者"情境中的責(zé)任評分。這說明道德、法律責(zé)任判斷的內(nèi)部機制有所不同,并且當(dāng)事人的不同角色導(dǎo)致第三方對其的責(zé)任判斷出現(xiàn)差異。
[Abstract]:In the two situations of "executor" and "bystander", this paper examines the moral and legal responsibility judgment of the subjects by manipulating their beliefs and the outcome of events.The results show that the subjects are more sensitive to the belief information of the parties in the judgment of moral responsibility, and the information about the outcome of the incident is more sensitive to the judgment of legal responsibility. "The scores of moral and legal responsibility in the executor's situation are higher than those in the 'bystander' situation.This shows that the internal mechanism of moral and legal liability judgment is different, and the different roles of the parties lead to the difference of the third party's judgment of liability.
【作者單位】： 深圳大學(xué);遼寧師范大學(xué);四川師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項目(31300872,81171289) 教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究青年項目(13YJC190013)的資助
【分類號】：B848.4

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 任晶晶;江琦;李樹芳;劉文文;徐雅s，

本文編號：1704127