本文選題：服刑人員　切入點(diǎn)：自尊　出處：《福建師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：服刑人員是一個(gè)特殊的群體,隨著媒體對(duì)有關(guān)服刑人員暴力事件報(bào)道的增多,人們對(duì)這個(gè)群體的關(guān)注程度也越來(lái)越高。然而,由于監(jiān)獄管理的特殊性以及保密性,長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),有關(guān)服刑人員的研究大多集中在對(duì)其心理健康、人格特征、自尊水平、攻擊性水平,及各因素之間的相互關(guān)系等的調(diào)查,且較少采用實(shí)證方法進(jìn)行研究。這不足以讓我們清楚而準(zhǔn)確地認(rèn)識(shí)、了解和掌握服刑人員的攻擊性現(xiàn)狀、自尊與攻擊性之間的關(guān)系。而隨著內(nèi)隱社會(huì)認(rèn)知概念的提出,相關(guān)研究方法(如內(nèi)隱聯(lián)想測(cè)驗(yàn))的革新,以及監(jiān)獄監(jiān)管部門(mén)管理設(shè)施的完善和人員配備的充足,使得對(duì)服刑人員進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究成為可能。本研究通過(guò)采用Rosenberg自尊量表(SES)和Buss-Perry攻擊性量表(BPAQ)分別測(cè)量服刑人員的外顯自尊和外顯攻擊性,采用內(nèi)隱聯(lián)想測(cè)驗(yàn)對(duì)服刑人員的內(nèi)隱自尊、內(nèi)隱攻擊性進(jìn)行研究,并探討了這四者之間的關(guān)系；在此基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)比了服刑人員和普通人的內(nèi)隱外顯自尊和內(nèi)隱外顯攻擊之間的關(guān)系；研究最后采用評(píng)價(jià)性條件反射技術(shù)(EC)對(duì)高外顯低內(nèi)隱自尊組(脆弱型自尊結(jié)構(gòu))服刑人員的內(nèi)隱自尊進(jìn)行干預(yù),從而進(jìn)一步探討了服刑人員自尊與攻擊性的變化及其關(guān)系,得出結(jié)論如下：(1)服刑人員存在顯著的內(nèi)隱自尊效應(yīng)和內(nèi)隱攻擊效應(yīng),且內(nèi)隱外顯自尊和內(nèi)隱外顯攻擊均表現(xiàn)出結(jié)構(gòu)性分離。(2)服刑人員的內(nèi)隱自尊與其外顯攻擊性之間無(wú)顯著相關(guān),而與其內(nèi)隱攻擊性呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān)；外顯自尊與外顯攻擊性呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān),而與內(nèi)隱攻擊性之間相關(guān)不顯著。(3)在四種自尊結(jié)構(gòu)類(lèi)型中,安全型自尊結(jié)構(gòu)類(lèi)型的服刑人員內(nèi)隱攻擊性最低；脆弱型自尊結(jié)構(gòu)類(lèi)型的服刑人員內(nèi)隱攻擊性最高,但外顯攻擊性最低;低外顯高內(nèi)隱自尊結(jié)構(gòu)類(lèi)型的服刑人員的外顯攻擊性、憤怒和敵意最高。(4)EC處理能有效提升內(nèi)隱自尊,但對(duì)外顯自尊的影響不明顯。(5)在經(jīng)過(guò)EC干預(yù)后,脆弱型高自尊結(jié)構(gòu)類(lèi)型向安全型自尊構(gòu)類(lèi)型轉(zhuǎn)化,從而內(nèi)隱攻擊性降低,但對(duì)外顯攻擊性影響不大。
[Abstract]:Prisoners are a special group. With the increase of media reports of violence against prisoners, people pay more and more attention to this group. However, due to the particularity of prison management and confidentiality, for a long time, Most of the studies on prisoners focused on their mental health, personality traits, self-esteem, aggression, and the interrelationship between various factors. It is not enough for us to understand, understand and master the current situation of aggression, the relationship between self-esteem and aggression, and the concept of implicit social cognition. Innovations in research methods, such as implicit association tests, as well as improvements in prison regulatory facilities and adequate staffing, In this study, the explicit self-esteem and explicit aggression of prisoners were measured by using Rosenberg self-esteem scale and Buss-Perry aggression scale respectively. The implicit self-esteem and implicit aggression of prisoners were studied by implicit association test, and the relationship between them was discussed. The relationship between implicit explicit self-esteem and implicit explicit attack was compared between prisoners and ordinary people. In the last part of the study, the evaluative conditioned reflex (ECR) technique was used to interfere with the implicit self-esteem of the prisoners in the group of high explicit and low implicit self-esteem (fragile self-esteem structure), so as to further explore the change and the relationship between the self-esteem and aggression of the prisoners. The conclusion is as follows: 1) there are significant implicit self-esteem effects and implicit aggression effects in prisoners. There was no significant correlation between implicit self-esteem and explicit aggression, but a significant negative correlation between implicit self-esteem and implicit aggression. Explicit self-esteem had a significant negative correlation with explicit aggression, but had no significant correlation with implicit aggression. The implicit aggression of the prisoners with fragile self-esteem structure type was the highest, but the explicit aggression was the lowest, while the explicit aggression of the prisoners with the low explicit and high implicit self-esteem structure type was the highest, the anger and hostility were the highest. However, the influence of explicit self-esteem was not obvious. (5) after EC intervention, the structural type of fragile high self-esteem changed to the type of safe self-esteem, thus the implicit aggression decreased, but the influence of explicit aggression was not significant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B844.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭芳;張進(jìn)輔;;勞教人員心理健康及其與攻擊性之間的關(guān)系[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年27期

2 張靜;自尊問(wèn)題研究綜述[J];南京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

3 邱昌建,張偉,方進(jìn)博;青年男性罪犯的個(gè)性分析[J];華西醫(yī)學(xué);2002年01期

4 劉連忠,肖水源;生活事件、社會(huì)支持與自殺未遂[J];臨床精神醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2002年02期

5 崔麗娟;胡海龍;吳明證;解春玲;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲成癮者的內(nèi)隱攻擊性研究[J];心理科學(xué);2006年03期

6 戴春林;孫曉玲;;關(guān)于服刑人員的內(nèi)隱攻擊性研究[J];心理科學(xué);2007年04期

7 戴春林;應(yīng)賢慧;;高中生攻擊性結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)應(yīng)對(duì)方式的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2008年04期

8 陳進(jìn);粱寧建;楊福義;;自尊內(nèi)隱改變的初步實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2009年04期

9 谷傳華,張文新;小學(xué)兒童欺負(fù)與人格傾向的關(guān)系[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

10 吳明證;楊福義;;自尊結(jié)構(gòu)與心理健康關(guān)系研究[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊福義;內(nèi)隱自尊的理論與實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李妍妍;自尊、攻擊、家庭教養(yǎng)方式及其關(guān)系的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];河南師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1618876