本文選題：認(rèn)知失敗　切入點(diǎn)：效度　出處：《中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志》2016年03期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的:在中國(guó)大學(xué)生群體中修訂認(rèn)知失敗問(wèn)卷(Cognitive Failures Questionnaire,CFQ),并檢驗(yàn)其信效度。方法:調(diào)查了1120名大學(xué)生,收回有效問(wèn)卷1014份,用以評(píng)定CFQ中文版的結(jié)構(gòu)效度、內(nèi)部一致性信度。另用日常記憶問(wèn)卷、大學(xué)生無(wú)聊傾向問(wèn)卷、Conners成人注意缺陷多動(dòng)障礙自評(píng)量表和大五人格量表在163名大學(xué)生中檢驗(yàn)效標(biāo)關(guān)聯(lián)效度。1個(gè)月后隨機(jī)選取104名大學(xué)生進(jìn)行重測(cè)。結(jié)果:CFQ中文版包括干擾、記憶、人際失誤、運(yùn)動(dòng)協(xié)調(diào)和人名記憶5個(gè)因子,共25個(gè)條目;驗(yàn)證性因素分析結(jié)果顯示5因素模型擬合良好(χ2/df=2.201,CFI=0.902,TLI=0.892,RMSEA=0.052,SRMR=0.045);問(wèn)卷總分與日常記憶、無(wú)聊傾向、注意缺陷多動(dòng)傾向、神經(jīng)質(zhì)的相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.41~0.50之間,與責(zé)任心的相關(guān)系數(shù)為-0.31;總問(wèn)卷的內(nèi)部一致性信度、分半信度和重測(cè)信度分別為0.86、0.83和0.87。女生在問(wèn)卷總分及干擾、記憶、人際失誤和運(yùn)動(dòng)協(xié)調(diào)維度上得分顯著高于男生。結(jié)論:CFQ中文版具有良好的效度和信度,可用于評(píng)估大學(xué)生的認(rèn)知失敗傾向。
[Abstract]:Objective: to revise the Cognitive Failures questionnaire for cognitive failure and test its reliability and validity in Chinese college students. Methods: 1 120 college students were investigated and 1 014 valid questionnaires were collected to evaluate the structural validity of the Chinese version of CFQ. Internal consistency reliability. Daily memory questionnaire, The self-rating scale for adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the Big five Personality scale (D5) were used to test the correlation validity of the criteria among 163 college students. One month later, 104 college students were randomly selected to retest. Results the Chinese version of the "1: CFQ" included interference. Five factors of memory, interpersonal error, motor coordination and personal name memory, 25 items were included. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 5-factor model fitted well (蠂 2 / dfn 2.201 / CFI 0.902 / TLI 0.892 / RMSEAA 0.052% SRMRN 0.045). The total score of questionnaire and daily memory, boredom tendency, attention deficit hyperactivity tendency, the total score of questionnaire and daily memory, boredom tendency, attention deficit hyperactivity tendency, the total score of questionnaire and daily memory, boredom tendency, attention deficit hyperactivity tendency, The correlation coefficient between neuroticism and responsibility was -0.31, the reliability of internal consistency, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.860.83 and 0.87 respectively. Conclusion the Chinese version of "1: CFQ" has good validity and reliability, which can be used to evaluate college students' cognitive failure tendency.
【作者單位】： 哈爾濱師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)院;佳木斯大學(xué)學(xué)生心理健康教育與咨詢(xún)中心;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B842.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 劉勇;陳健芷;宋琳婷;趙宇;楊曉麗;張盼;周卉;;無(wú)聊傾向量表(BPS):中文版的結(jié)構(gòu)、信度及效度[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2014年01期

2 姚若松;梁樂(lè)瑤;;大五人格量表簡(jiǎn)化版(NEO-FFI)在大學(xué)生人群的應(yīng)用分析[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2010年04期

3 黃時(shí)華;李冬玲;張衛(wèi);李董平;鐘海榮;黃誠(chéng)懇;;大學(xué)生無(wú)聊傾向問(wèn)卷的初步編制[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2010年03期

4 黎琳;徐光興;;成人注意缺陷多動(dòng)障礙的診斷現(xiàn)狀[J];上海精神醫(yī)學(xué);2006年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馮華萍;完美主義、延遲滿(mǎn)足對(duì)注意力缺陷多動(dòng)傾向和后悔關(guān)系的影響研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李丹丹;劉q，

本文編號(hào)：1595126