樸正熙政權(quán)與韓國(guó)現(xiàn)代化模式的形成
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-25 18:50
【摘要】： 本文主要考察了20世紀(jì)六十年代韓國(guó)現(xiàn)代化模式的形成過程,以及與樸正熙政權(quán)的關(guān)系。 緒論主要闡述了選題意義、研究動(dòng)態(tài)、研究方法和目的、研究資料等問題。 第一章主要論述樸正熙的現(xiàn)代化思想和“漢江奇跡”的前提,主要論述了韓國(guó)光復(fù)以后的政治歷程與第二共和國(guó)時(shí)期的政治混亂局面,經(jīng)濟(jì)破敗不堪,其形式可用“一團(tuán)糟”“渺無希望”來形容,鐵腕統(tǒng)治呼之欲出,樸正熙的現(xiàn)代化思想和開發(fā)獨(dú)裁正是這種特定時(shí)代的產(chǎn)物。20世紀(jì)60年代,韓國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)代化的顯著特點(diǎn)就是出于起飛階段,而“經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展第一主義”等則提供了經(jīng)濟(jì)起飛所必需的基本前提條件,樸正熙自身政策失誤是韓國(guó)逐漸摸索適合本國(guó)國(guó)情的經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)代化模式。 第二章主要論述的是韓國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)起飛的社會(huì)和政治前提、美國(guó)對(duì)韓國(guó)政策的變化對(duì)韓國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)起飛起到的積極作用。 第三章主要論述的是韓國(guó)企業(yè)界對(duì)出口導(dǎo)向政策的影響。樸正熙集團(tuán)上臺(tái)以后,面臨的棘手問題之一是怎樣懲處不法斂財(cái)者在這個(gè)問題上,由于樸正熙政權(quán)本身就有與財(cái)閥達(dá)成新的協(xié)助關(guān)系的意向,所以沒有與美國(guó)發(fā)生明顯的沖突。另一方面,雖然美國(guó)強(qiáng)調(diào)以中小企業(yè)為中心的政策,但樸正熙政權(quán)仍堅(jiān)持了以大企業(yè)為中心的政策。企業(yè)家對(duì)出口導(dǎo)向政策的影響。企業(yè)家在樸正熙政權(quán)選擇出口導(dǎo)向經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略方面發(fā)揮了不容忽視的重要作用。在出口第一主義問題上,可能既有樸正熙接受企業(yè)家建議的一面,也有樸正熙順應(yīng)國(guó)內(nèi)外市場(chǎng)需求的一面。 第四章主要論述的是樸正熙政權(quán)的出口導(dǎo)向工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略。出口代替政策與出口導(dǎo)向政策的優(yōu)劣,盡管外向性工業(yè)化加深對(duì)外依附程度,但可以避免進(jìn)口替代工業(yè)化的弊端。外向型工業(yè)化可以促進(jìn)適合于發(fā)展中國(guó)家資源狀況的工業(yè)部門的專業(yè)化和出口,通過對(duì)外交流也可取得學(xué)習(xí)效果,依靠國(guó)外市場(chǎng)也可發(fā)揮其規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)的優(yōu)勢(shì)。而且擴(kuò)大出口提高了引進(jìn)外資的可能性,從而超越了國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)和資本方面的局限,使持續(xù)的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)成為可能。特別是二戰(zhàn)以后,世界經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模的急劇擴(kuò)大成為提高外向型工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略的有效條件。相反,進(jìn)口替代工業(yè)化只要不以國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)潛力和豐富的資源為依托,就不可避免地會(huì)遇到國(guó)際收支問題。在60年代前半期,在全世界絕大部分發(fā)展中國(guó)家都選擇進(jìn)口替代工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略之時(shí),韓國(guó)逆世界潮流,最終選擇了外向型工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略,從而被學(xué)術(shù)界評(píng)價(jià)為走向成功的起點(diǎn)。 第五章主要論述的是在樸正熙發(fā)展模式中,出口主導(dǎo)型工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略和進(jìn)口替代工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略呈現(xiàn)為表里關(guān)系,得到了雙線形推進(jìn)。 結(jié)論部分綜述了全文要點(diǎn),提出了本文的研究結(jié)論。 本研究注意避免片面性,力求做到吸收前人研究成果,在此基礎(chǔ)上定性研究與定量研究相結(jié)合；宏觀研究與微觀研究相結(jié)合；史實(shí)論述與評(píng)價(jià)相結(jié)合,以便評(píng)價(jià)樸正熙和韓國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)代化,為日后的研究,提供有益的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及可吸取的歷史教訓(xùn)。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly investigates the formation process of Korea's modernization model in the 1960s and its relationship with Park Chung-hee's regime.
The introduction mainly expounds the significance of topic selection, research trends, research methods and purposes, research data and so on.
The first chapter mainly discusses the modernization thought of Park Chung-hee and the premise of the "Han River Miracle". It mainly discusses the political process after the restoration of South Korea and the political chaos of the Second Republic. The economy is destroyed. Its form can be described as "a mess", "hopelessness". The iron-handed rule is eager to emerge, and the modernization thought of Park Chung-hee is eager to emerge. In the 1960s, South Korea's economic modernization was marked by its takeoff stage, while "economic development first doctrine" provided the basic prerequisites for economic takeoff. Park's own policy mistakes were the economic realities that South Korea gradually explored to suit its national conditions. Substitution mode.
The second chapter mainly discusses the social and political prerequisites for the economic takeoff of South Korea, and the positive role played by the change of American policy towards South Korea in the economic takeoff of South Korea.
The third chapter mainly discusses the influence of Korean business circles on export-oriented policy.One of the thorny problems faced by the Park Chung-hee Group after taking office is how to punish the illegal money-collectors.Because the Park Chung-hee regime itself has the intention of reaching a new assistance relationship with the chaebols,it has not had an obvious conflict with the United States. On the one hand, although the United States emphasized the policy of taking SMEs as the center, the Park Zhengxi regime still adhered to the policy of taking large enterprises as the center. It may be that Park accepts entrepreneurs'suggestions and that he also meets the needs of domestic and foreign markets.
The fourth chapter mainly discusses the export-oriented industrialization strategy of Park Zhengxi's regime.The advantages and disadvantages of export substitution policy and export-oriented policy can avoid the drawbacks of import substitution industrialization although export-oriented industrialization deepens its dependence on foreign countries. Specialisation and exports can also be learned through foreign exchange, and the advantages of economies of scale can be brought into play by relying on foreign markets. Expanding exports raises the possibility of introducing foreign capital, thus transcending the limitations of domestic markets and capital, and making sustained economic growth possible, especially after World War II. On the contrary, import substitution industrialization will inevitably encounter balance of payments problems as long as it is not based on domestic market potential and abundant resources. In the first half of the 1960s, most developing countries in the world chose import substitution industrialization strategy. At that time, South Korea went against the world trend and finally chose the export-oriented industrialization strategy, which was appraised by the academic circles as the starting point for success.
The fifth chapter mainly discusses that in Park Zhengxi's development model, the export-oriented industrialization strategy and the import-substitution industrialization strategy show the inner-outer relationship and get the double-linear promotion.
The conclusion summarizes the main points of this paper and puts forward the conclusions of this study.
This research pays attention to avoiding one-sidedness and strives to absorb predecessors'research results. On this basis, qualitative research and quantitative research are combined; macro research and micro research are combined; historical facts are combined with evaluation in order to evaluate the economic modernization of Park Chung-hee and South Korea, and provide useful experience and history for future research. Lesson.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K312.63
本文編號(hào)：2203788
[Abstract]:This paper mainly investigates the formation process of Korea's modernization model in the 1960s and its relationship with Park Chung-hee's regime.
The introduction mainly expounds the significance of topic selection, research trends, research methods and purposes, research data and so on.
The first chapter mainly discusses the modernization thought of Park Chung-hee and the premise of the "Han River Miracle". It mainly discusses the political process after the restoration of South Korea and the political chaos of the Second Republic. The economy is destroyed. Its form can be described as "a mess", "hopelessness". The iron-handed rule is eager to emerge, and the modernization thought of Park Chung-hee is eager to emerge. In the 1960s, South Korea's economic modernization was marked by its takeoff stage, while "economic development first doctrine" provided the basic prerequisites for economic takeoff. Park's own policy mistakes were the economic realities that South Korea gradually explored to suit its national conditions. Substitution mode.
The second chapter mainly discusses the social and political prerequisites for the economic takeoff of South Korea, and the positive role played by the change of American policy towards South Korea in the economic takeoff of South Korea.
The third chapter mainly discusses the influence of Korean business circles on export-oriented policy.One of the thorny problems faced by the Park Chung-hee Group after taking office is how to punish the illegal money-collectors.Because the Park Chung-hee regime itself has the intention of reaching a new assistance relationship with the chaebols,it has not had an obvious conflict with the United States. On the one hand, although the United States emphasized the policy of taking SMEs as the center, the Park Zhengxi regime still adhered to the policy of taking large enterprises as the center. It may be that Park accepts entrepreneurs'suggestions and that he also meets the needs of domestic and foreign markets.
The fourth chapter mainly discusses the export-oriented industrialization strategy of Park Zhengxi's regime.The advantages and disadvantages of export substitution policy and export-oriented policy can avoid the drawbacks of import substitution industrialization although export-oriented industrialization deepens its dependence on foreign countries. Specialisation and exports can also be learned through foreign exchange, and the advantages of economies of scale can be brought into play by relying on foreign markets. Expanding exports raises the possibility of introducing foreign capital, thus transcending the limitations of domestic markets and capital, and making sustained economic growth possible, especially after World War II. On the contrary, import substitution industrialization will inevitably encounter balance of payments problems as long as it is not based on domestic market potential and abundant resources. In the first half of the 1960s, most developing countries in the world chose import substitution industrialization strategy. At that time, South Korea went against the world trend and finally chose the export-oriented industrialization strategy, which was appraised by the academic circles as the starting point for success.
The fifth chapter mainly discusses that in Park Zhengxi's development model, the export-oriented industrialization strategy and the import-substitution industrialization strategy show the inner-outer relationship and get the double-linear promotion.
The conclusion summarizes the main points of this paper and puts forward the conclusions of this study.
This research pays attention to avoiding one-sidedness and strives to absorb predecessors'research results. On this basis, qualitative research and quantitative research are combined; macro research and micro research are combined; historical facts are combined with evaluation in order to evaluate the economic modernization of Park Chung-hee and South Korea, and provide useful experience and history for future research. Lesson.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K312.63
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 金世中，樸炳 ;樸正熙權(quán)威主義體制和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[J];當(dāng)代韓國(guó);1995年01期
2 楊光錚;變遷與走向:韓國(guó)權(quán)威主義的嬗變[J];當(dāng)代韓國(guó);1998年03期
3 尹益洙;韓國(guó)由權(quán)威主義向政治民主化轉(zhuǎn)型的回顧與思考[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年03期
4 王彩波;論權(quán)威主義政體在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中的作用[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期
5 姚傳德;樸正熙的現(xiàn)代化思想[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 劉淼;樸正熙政權(quán)的特征、績(jī)效與局限性分析[D];中共中央黨校;2001年
2 夏自景;樸正熙政府與韓國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)代化[D];青島大學(xué);2006年
，本文編號(hào)：2203788
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2203788.html
最近更新
教材專著
