【摘要】： 朝鮮半島地處東北亞核心部位,介于中、日、俄三大國(guó)之間。歷史上,朝鮮半島正是由于具有這種獨(dú)特的戰(zhàn)略地位而屢次陷入大國(guó)爭(zhēng)奪的漩渦之中。從19世紀(jì)末的朝鮮王朝到20世紀(jì)中期的朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng),每當(dāng)朝鮮半島陷入大國(guó)爭(zhēng)奪的危機(jī)狀態(tài)時(shí),朝鮮半島“中立化論”就被推上政治前臺(tái),但每次都未能真正得以實(shí)施。 冷戰(zhàn)以后,東北亞的國(guó)際形勢(shì)有所緩和。為了避免朝鮮半島重蹈歷史覆轍,很多韓國(guó)學(xué)者以前人的朝鮮半島“中立化論”為基礎(chǔ),提出了以“中立化”的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)朝鮮半島統(tǒng)一的“中立化統(tǒng)一論”。 本文即以朝鮮半島“中立化論”為探討對(duì)象,從歷史學(xué)的視角出發(fā),綜合運(yùn)用國(guó)際法學(xué)、地緣政治學(xué)和國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)等多個(gè)學(xué)科的知識(shí),試圖對(duì)該理論作一次縱向?qū)用娴难芯�。筆者旨在通過(guò)對(duì)具體史實(shí)的梳理和分析,力求清晰客觀(guān)地展現(xiàn)朝鮮半島“中立化論”產(chǎn)生及其發(fā)展演變的歷史脈絡(luò),并對(duì)該理論實(shí)現(xiàn)的可能性提出了自己的思考。 本文由引言和正文兩個(gè)部分組成,其中正文主要包括以下五個(gè)部分: 第一部分:該部分基于國(guó)際法學(xué)的知識(shí)和定義,首先界定了“中立”、“中立化”及相關(guān)概念,并從地緣政治的視角對(duì)朝鮮半島特殊的戰(zhàn)略地位以及朝鮮半島與有關(guān)大國(guó)的歷史糾葛進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要的論述和分析。 第二部分:朝鮮王朝末期的朝鮮“中立化論”。該部分以大國(guó)在朝鮮半島力量的消長(zhǎng)為分期依據(jù),介紹中日角逐朝鮮時(shí)期的朝鮮“中立化論”、日俄爭(zhēng)奪朝鮮時(shí)期的朝鮮“中立化論”以及朝鮮王室為爭(zhēng)取國(guó)家“中立化”的努力,并探討了這兩個(gè)時(shí)期各大國(guó)和朝鮮王朝提出“中立化論”的目的、內(nèi)容及“中立化”未能實(shí)現(xiàn)的原因。 第三部分:冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期的朝鮮半島“中立化論”。冷戰(zhàn)之初,朝鮮半島走向了國(guó)家分裂,朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)促使美國(guó)提出了朝鮮半島“中立化論”,旨住韓國(guó)的主導(dǎo)下實(shí)行“中立化統(tǒng)一”。該部分以美國(guó)官方推出朝鮮半島“中立化論”的過(guò)程為主要線(xiàn)索,剖忻了這一時(shí)期朝鮮半島“中立化論”再次未能實(shí)現(xiàn)的原因,并指出該理論開(kāi)始逐漸退出美國(guó)官方的視野。 第四部分:冷戰(zhàn)之后的朝鮮半島“中立化論”。該部分結(jié)合冷戰(zhàn)之后的東北亞國(guó)際發(fā)展趨勢(shì),以新時(shí)期朝鮮半島“中立化論”的內(nèi)容(主要由韓國(guó)學(xué)者提出)為依據(jù),對(duì)影響該理論實(shí)現(xiàn)的諸多因素進(jìn)行了綜合分析,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)該理論實(shí)現(xiàn)的可能性做出了自己的判斷。 第五部分:結(jié)語(yǔ)。該部分對(duì)全文做了總結(jié),進(jìn)一步闡明了作者對(duì)朝鮮半島“中立化論”實(shí)現(xiàn)前景所持有的觀(guān)點(diǎn)。 歷史上,有關(guān)大國(guó)首先提出朝鮮半島“中立化論”,爾后又都未能實(shí)行,這其中與中國(guó)有著緊密的聯(lián)系。而未來(lái)朝鮮半島何去何從,能否以“中立化統(tǒng)一”的方式成為“永久中立國(guó)”,更直接關(guān)系到中國(guó)的國(guó)家利益。筆者相信,新時(shí)期的中國(guó)外交一定能更好地適應(yīng)時(shí)代發(fā)展的潮流,“與鄰為伴,以鄰為善”,與朝韓兩國(guó)共筑和平共贏的睦鄰友好關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The Korean Peninsula is located at the core of Northeast Asia, between the three great powers of China, Japan and Russia. Historically, the Korean Peninsula has fallen into the whirlpool of great power contention for its unique strategic position. The "Neutralization" theory on the Korean Peninsula has been pushed onto the political front, but it has not been implemented every time.
After the cold war, the international situation in Northeast Asia eased. In order to avoid the Korean Peninsula repeating the historical mistakes, many Korean scholars put forward the "neutralization unification theory" of realizing the reunification of the Korean peninsula by means of "neutralization".
This paper, taking the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula as an object of study, tries to make a longitudinal study of the theory from the perspective of history by using the knowledge of international law, geopolitics and international relations. The historical context of the emergence and evolution of the "neutralization theory" on the Korean Peninsula, and the possibility of its realization are also discussed.
This article is composed of two parts, the introduction and the main body. The body contains five parts.
Part one: Based on the knowledge and definition of international law, this part defines "neutrality", "neutralization" and related concepts, and briefly discusses and analyzes the special strategic position of the Korean Peninsula and the historical entanglement between the Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers concerned from the perspective of geopolitics.
The second part: the "neutralization theory" of Korea in the end of the Korean Dynasty. This part introduces the "neutralization theory" of Korea when China and Japan compete for Korea, the "neutralization theory" of Korea when Japan and Russia compete for Korea, and the efforts of the Korean royal family to strive for the "neutralization" of the country on the basis of the growth and decline of the great powers on the Korean Peninsula. The purpose, content and reasons why neutralization was not realized by the major powers and dynasties in these two periods were discussed.
The third part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the cold war period. At the beginning of the cold war, the Korean Peninsula was divided into two states. The Korean War prompted the United States to put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula, aiming at the implementation of "neutralization reunification" under the leadership of South Korea. The reason why the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula failed to come true again in this period is analyzed, and it is pointed out that the theory began to gradually withdraw from the view of the U.S. government.
The fourth part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula after the Cold War, which combines with the international development trend of Northeast Asia after the Cold War and based on the content of the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the new period (mainly put forward by Korean scholars), makes a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing the realization of the theory, and on this basis analyzes the theory. The possibility of realization has made its own judgement.
The fifth part is the conclusion. This part summarizes the full text and further clarifies the author's views on the prospects of realizing neutralization on the Korean Peninsula.
Historically, the Major Powers concerned first put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula and then failed to put it into practice, which is closely related to China. Foreign diplomacy will surely be able to better adapt to the trend of the times and build a peaceful and win-win good-neighborly and friendly relationship with the DPRK and ROK.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K312

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 毛吉康;近代朝鮮半島中立問(wèn)題研究（1882-1905）[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2198539