本文選題：冷戰(zhàn)起源 + 朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭　； 參考：《外交學院》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 冷戰(zhàn)是第二次世界大戰(zhàn)后美國和蘇聯(lián)遏制反遏制斗爭所形成的兩國關系和整個戰(zhàn)后國際關系的一種狀態(tài),是1947年至1991年的一種國際體系。它持續(xù)戰(zhàn)后四十多年,對世界各國乃至整個國際格局的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生重大深遠影響。冷戰(zhàn)一直是各國學術界關注的問題。美國學者對冷戰(zhàn)的研究起步早、成果多,出版了大量相關著作,美國的冷戰(zhàn)史研究者還形成了多個學派。中國的學者對冷戰(zhàn)的研究相對而言起步較晚,并曾受到蘇聯(lián)觀點較強的影響,“文革”前由于我國基本處于封閉狀態(tài),有關方面的資料甚少,對“冷戰(zhàn)”的研究極為薄弱。20世紀80年代末90年代初,隨著蘇聯(lián)及其陣營的解體,國際學術界掀起了對冷戰(zhàn)史研究的高潮。隨著國際學術界對冷戰(zhàn)史研究的不斷深入,中國學者也開始投身該領域的研究,翻譯出版了不少外國學者、政治家有關冷戰(zhàn)的著述,并盡可能依據(jù)第一手資料,采用歷史唯物主義方法,開展自己的研究,對一些重大歷史事件特別是有關中國方面的問題進行了探討,取得了一批有較高學術價值的研究成果。東西方學者對冷戰(zhàn)問題的研究,不僅具有學術價值,而且具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義,因為冷戰(zhàn)研究中的若干問題至今尚未達成共識,以至于對當今國際問題的解讀也時有分歧。本文采取文本分析法,研究意在對國內(nèi)外、東西方學術界在半個多世紀以來對若干冷戰(zhàn)問題的研究狀況作出歷史的回顧,并作出比較分析,找出東西方學者對冷戰(zhàn)問題看法的相異和相同點,以及產(chǎn)生相異和相同點的原因。
[Abstract]:The Cold War is a state of the relations between the United States and the Soviet Union after the second World War and the whole postwar international relations formed by the struggle to contain the anti-containment. It is an international system from 1947 to 1991. It lasted for more than 40 years after the war and had a profound influence on the development of the world and even the whole international pattern. The Cold War has always been the concern of academic circles. American scholars began their research on the Cold War early and produced a lot of related works. American researchers of Cold War history also formed many schools of thought. Chinese scholars started relatively late in the study of the Cold War and were strongly influenced by the Soviet view. Before the "Cultural Revolution," because China was basically in a closed state, there were very few data on the relevant aspects. The study of "Cold War" is extremely weak. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and its camp, the international academic circles set off a climax of research on the history of the Cold War. With the deepening of the research on the history of the cold war in the international academic circles, Chinese scholars have also begun to devote themselves to the research in this field, translating and publishing many foreign scholars and politicians' writings on the cold war, and making use of first-hand materials as far as possible. By using the method of historical materialism, the author carries out his own research, and probes into some important historical events, especially the problems concerning China, and obtains a number of research results with high academic value. The study of Cold War not only has academic value, but also has important practical significance, because some problems in cold war research have not reached a consensus so far, even the interpretation of current international problems is sometimes different. This paper adopts the text analysis method, the purpose of this study is to make a historical review and comparative analysis of the research status of some cold war problems at home and abroad and in the academic circles of East and West in the past more than half a century. To find out the differences and similarities of scholars' views on the Cold War, and the reasons for the differences and similarities.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：K153

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 胡石磊;論冷戰(zhàn)時期基辛格的核戰(zhàn)略思想[D];山東師范大學;2012年

，

本文編號：2061498