本文選題：金元外交 + 威爾遜　； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： “金元外交”是美國(guó)外交政策的傳統(tǒng)之一，在20世紀(jì)前期，“金元外交”也被用來為美國(guó)在中國(guó)擴(kuò)張勢(shì)力服務(wù)。塔夫脫政府時(shí)，“金元外交”得到大規(guī)模應(yīng)用，主要的行動(dòng)有擠入湖廣鐵路借款、參加四國(guó)銀行團(tuán)、提出“諾克斯計(jì)劃”和策劃“幣制實(shí)業(yè)借款”，這些行動(dòng)多以失敗告終。不久，日俄兩國(guó)加入銀行團(tuán)，銀行團(tuán)由四國(guó)擴(kuò)大為六國(guó)，美國(guó)在六國(guó)銀行團(tuán)中遭到排擠，“金元外交”于是陷入困境。威爾遜上臺(tái)以后，著手對(duì)“金元外交”進(jìn)行改革，宣布退出六國(guó)銀行團(tuán)，放棄塔夫脫的與其他列強(qiáng)合作的政策，，號(hào)召美國(guó)商人繞過銀行團(tuán)，在中國(guó)進(jìn)行獨(dú)立投資。但由于威爾遜政府沒有給予商業(yè)項(xiàng)目以足夠的政治支持，三年的獨(dú)立投資實(shí)踐并不成功，威爾遜不得不放棄“單干”的做法，重新認(rèn)同了國(guó)際銀行團(tuán)這種合作方式，并組建了一個(gè)新銀行團(tuán)。新銀行團(tuán)在經(jīng)濟(jì)方面無所作為，沒有為美國(guó)爭(zhēng)取到一筆貸款；但在政治方面，美國(guó)以新銀行團(tuán)的名義與日本談判，迫使日本勢(shì)力退出東部?jī)?nèi)蒙古，這是一個(gè)成果。威爾遜政府時(shí)期的美國(guó)對(duì)華“金元外交”，特色之一是持續(xù)了三年的獨(dú)立投資實(shí)踐，另外，威爾遜在獨(dú)立投資實(shí)踐失敗以后，立即改變政策，回歸銀行團(tuán)，說明了靈活善變也是威爾遜“金元外交”政策的一個(gè)特點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:"Jin Yuan diplomacy" is one of the traditions of American foreign policy. In the early 20th century, "Jin Yuan diplomacy" was also used to serve the expanding power of the United States in China. During the Taft administration, "Jin Yuan diplomacy" was applied on a large scale. The main actions were to squeeze loans into Huguang Railway, join the four-country bank group, put forward the "Knox plan" and plan "currency industrial borrowing", which ended in failure. Soon, Japan and Russia joined the banking group, the banking group expanded from four countries to six countries, the United States was excluded from the six countries' banking groups, and the "gold and yuan diplomacy" fell into a dilemma. After Wilson came to power, he began to reform the "Jin Yuan diplomacy", announced his withdrawal from the six-nation bank group, abandoned Taft's policy of cooperating with other powers, and called on American businessmen to bypass the banking syndicate and make independent investments in China. However, since the Wilson administration did not give sufficient political support to commercial projects, three years of independent investment practice did not succeed. Wilson had to give up the practice of "doing it alone" and reapproved the cooperation of international banking groups. A new banking group was formed. The new banking group did nothing on the economic front and failed to secure a loan for the United States, but politically, the United States negotiated with Japan in the name of the new banking group to force Japanese forces out of eastern Inner Mongolia, a result. One of the characteristics of the United States'"gold-yuan diplomacy" to China during the Wilson administration was that it lasted three years of independent investment practice. In addition, after the failure of the independent investment practice, Wilson immediately changed his policy and returned to the banking syndicate. It shows that flexibility is also a characteristic of Wilson's "golden yuan foreign policy".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：K712

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 江振鵬;國(guó)際債務(wù)危機(jī)與美國(guó)金融霸權(quán)之基[D];南開大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2029363