本文選題：民意黨 + 民粹主義��； 參考：《蘇州科技學院》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：民意黨是俄國革命民粹主義的一個重要組織。它的理論和實踐活動在俄國革命運動歷史上占有重要地位。本文試圖以民意黨的醞釀、發(fā)展、消亡為主要線索,論述從1879年至1884年民意黨革命者與專制政權所做的斗爭,研究探討民意黨產(chǎn)生的背景、民意黨的建立,對民意黨的社會經(jīng)濟思想、組織原則和結構、民意黨的工人小組、軍事組織對民意黨進行全面分析。同時從俄國歷史傳統(tǒng)文化與外來文化沖擊的角度,重點分析民意黨恐怖主義產(chǎn)生的背景和淵源,重點分析民意黨恐怖主義產(chǎn)生的背景和淵源,在對恐怖主義進行批判的同時,從俄國社會發(fā)展道路選擇的角度出發(fā),將民意黨置于歷史坐標軸中以恰當位置,對其進行辯證的評價,認為民意黨在自己的思想活動中增添了新的內容:首先,提出了必須進行政治斗爭,徹底拋棄了民粹派的無政府主義理論;其次,它的活動范圍和組織完善程度,大大超過以前的民粹派;最后,認識到工人階級同農(nóng)民階級相比,更具有革命性。但是,民意黨作為一個知識分子群體,由于自身的無根性以及英雄史觀的錯誤指導,使得他們得不到社會任何一個階級的理解和支持,最終失敗。他們對俄國社會發(fā)展道路的選擇和嘗試,有助于體察俄國革命傳統(tǒng)的歷史聯(lián)系,深入理解俄羅斯文化傳統(tǒng)。
[Abstract]:The popular Party is an important organization of Russian revolutionary populism. Its theoretical and practical activities played an important role in the history of the Russian revolutionary movement. This paper attempts to discuss the struggle between the revolutionaries of the public opinion party and the autocratic regime from 1879 to 1884, taking the brewing, development and extinction of the public opinion party as the main clue, and to study the background of the emergence of the public opinion party and the establishment of the public opinion party. A comprehensive analysis is made of the social and economic thoughts, organizational principles and structures of the public opinion party, the workers' group of the public opinion party and the military organization. At the same time, from the perspective of Russian historical traditional culture and the impact of foreign culture, the background and origin of public opinion party terrorism are emphatically analyzed. While criticizing terrorism, From the point of view of the choice of the way of Russian social development, this paper puts the public opinion party in the proper position in the historical coordinate axis, evaluates it dialectically, and thinks that the public opinion party has added new contents in its own ideological activities: first of all, He put forward the anarchist theory that must be waged political struggle and completely abandoned the populist faction; secondly, its scope of activities and degree of organizational perfection were much greater than those of the previous populist clique; finally, it was recognized that the working class was compared with the peasant class. More revolutionary. However, as an intellectual group, the public opinion party, because of its own rootlessness and the wrong guidance of the hero's view of history, made it impossible for them to get the understanding and support of any class in the society, and they failed in the end. Their choice and attempt on the development of Russian society are helpful to understand the historical connection of Russian revolutionary tradition and to understand Russian cultural tradition deeply.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州科技學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K512.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 姚海;19世紀俄國革命激進主義及其根源[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2003年03期

2 姚海;俄國激進革命知識分子的特征及其影響[J];俄羅斯研究;2004年03期

，

本文編號：2019042