本文選題：法吉赫體制 + 政治發(fā)展��； 參考：《西北大學》2007年博士論文

【摘要】： 本論文以馬克思唯物主義政治發(fā)展觀為基本研究理論，堅持歷史與現(xiàn)實相結合、理論與實踐相結合、具體問題具體分析的原則，對后霍梅尼時代的伊朗政治發(fā)展進行研究。在寫作方法上，采用歷史學的階段分析法和專題論述法，從橫向和縱向兩個角度對霍梅尼之后的伊朗政治進行梳理和深入研究。同時，，論文將彭樹智先生的“文明交往論’’作為主要指導理論之一，借鑒和吸收了西方政治發(fā)展理論中有益的研究理論和方法。論文通過對后霍梅尼時代伊朗錯綜復雜的政教關系、傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代、革命和革新等多種因素的分析，對伊朗伊斯蘭政治體制本身及其演變的研究，探究伊朗政治變遷的本質。 論文第一章主要對中西方的政治發(fā)展理論作了比較研究，在堅持唯物主義政治發(fā)展觀的同時，對伊斯蘭教和政治發(fā)展理論的關系進行了探討，進而明確了伊朗政治發(fā)展研究的方法和研究范疇。 第二章對伊斯蘭革命及其革命后霍梅尼的十年之治進行了探討，主要從政治、經(jīng)濟、文化和外交四大方面進行論述，重點就革命和伊斯蘭化政策對伊朗政治體制、國家決策、社會意識形態(tài)和國內爭論等方面產(chǎn)生的影響進行了分析。 第三、四章則主要是對哈梅內伊時代的兩任總統(tǒng)——拉夫桑賈尼和哈塔米的政治改革理論和實踐進行了分析，論文在展現(xiàn)不同時期伊朗政治發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀的同時，對二人執(zhí)政時期的改革得失進行了剖析。 第五、六章主要對后霍梅尼時代伊朗政治發(fā)展的特點和影響伊朗未來政治發(fā)展的因素進行了分析。第七章則在結合當前伊朗政治現(xiàn)狀的基礎上提出了研究伊朗政治發(fā)展問題的要點。 基于以上研究成果，本論文得出以下結論：1、法吉赫體制作為伊朗政治制度的核心，在伊朗的政治變遷中既是改革的體制框架，也是國內爭論的焦點，面臨著合法性危機。2、來自民間的民主化要求既為伊朗政府改革提供了動力和民意支持，也為伊朗政治發(fā)展帶來了不穩(wěn)定因素。3、后霍梅尼時代，盡管伊朗政治發(fā)展路途艱難，但改革的趨勢不可逆轉。4、美伊關系問題和美國的中東改造計劃對伊朗的政治民主化和現(xiàn)代化提出了挑戰(zhàn)。
[Abstract]:This paper takes Marxist materialistic political development view as the basic research theory, adheres to the principle of combining history with reality, combining theory with practice and concrete analysis of concrete problems, and studies the political development of Iran in the post-Khomeini era. In terms of writing methods, the historical stage analysis and monographs are used to sort out and study Iranian politics after Khomeini from horizontal and vertical angles. At the same time, the thesis takes Peng Shuzhi's "civilized communication theory" as one of the main guiding theories, and draws on the beneficial research theories and methods in the western political development theory. By analyzing the complicated relationship between state and religion, tradition and modernity, revolution and innovation in the post-Khomeini era, the paper studies the Islamic political system itself and its evolution, and explores the essence of Iranian political change. The first chapter makes a comparative study on the theory of political development between China and the West, and probes into the relationship between Islam and the theory of political development while adhering to the materialist political development view. Furthermore, it clarifies the research method and scope of Iranian political development. The second chapter discusses the Islamic Revolution and the 10-year rule of Khomeini after the revolution, mainly from the political, economic, cultural and diplomatic aspects, focusing on Iran's political system and national decision-making on revolution and Islamization policy. The influence of social ideology and domestic controversy is analyzed. The third and fourth chapters mainly analyze the political reform theory and practice of the two presidents of Khamenei era-Rafsanjani and Khatami. The thesis shows the current situation of Iranian political development in different periods. This paper analyzes the gains and losses of the reform during the period of the two men in power. Chapter five and chapter six mainly analyze the characteristics of Iranian political development and the factors that influence the future political development of Iran in the post-Khomeini era. The seventh chapter puts forward the main points of studying Iranian political development on the basis of the current Iranian political situation. Based on the above research results, this paper draws the following conclusion: 1. As the core of Iran's political system, Fagheh system is not only the institutional framework of reform, but also the focus of domestic controversy in Iran's political changes. Faced with the crisis of legitimacy, the democratic demands from the civilian sector have not only provided impetus and public support for the reform of the Iranian government, but also brought instability to Iran's political development, the post-Khomeini era, despite the difficult path of Iranian political development. However, the trend of reform is irreversible. The relationship between the United States and Iraq and the reform plan in the Middle East of the United States have challenged Iran's political democratization and modernization.
【學位授予單位】：西北大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：K373.6

【引證文獻】

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 韓建偉;理想與現(xiàn)實的較量[D];西北大學;2010年

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 張艷霞;論伊朗內政與外交中的伊斯蘭因素[D];新疆大學;2011年

2 劉曉芳;哈塔米執(zhí)政時期的伊朗外交[D];西北大學;2008年

3 李衛(wèi)杰;伊朗政治地理特征研究[D];西南大學;2010年

4 王

本文編號：1863356