本文選題：北方領土 + 軍事沖突　； 參考：《東北師范大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：無論是從日本本國來講,還是從世界歷史發(fā)展的角度來說,日本幕末時期都是一個動蕩不堪的時代。其中這一時期的日俄領土問題尤為引人注目,并對兩國關系產(chǎn)生了深遠的影響。時至今日,日俄雙方爭論的焦點仍舊是北方領土的歸屬問題。本文試以幕末日俄兩國圍繞北方領土而展開的軍事沖突,及之后達成的第一個領土協(xié)議《下田條約》為研究對象,在汲取前人研究成果的基礎上,以期對日俄兩國領土問題的由來作出客觀的分析和判斷。 本文共分三章。第一章闡述了日俄兩國在北方諸島進行的最初擴張。本章從日俄兩國首次政府間的正式接觸入手,意在從中找出兩國對北方領土的占有欲望及擴張意圖。 第二章闡述了日俄的軍事沖突。本章從日俄兩國在最初接觸中出現(xiàn)的矛盾入手,對進而轉(zhuǎn)化成軍事沖突的過程進行分析,以此來論述在解決當時的北方領土問題時,兩國的軍事力量對問題的解決起到了哪些作用。 第三章則主要分析兩國的外交策略。本章從俄美叩關入手,論述在日俄達成條約的過程中,兩國的外交方針、不同戰(zhàn)略偏向?qū)l約達成的影響以及當時雙方的軍事態(tài)勢等,對條約達成起到哪些推動作用。并且,對條約達成后兩國北方領土之爭處于何種狀態(tài)做了進一步分析,最終對條約的性質(zhì)做出合理判斷。 本文在掌握大量俄、日文一手資料的前提下,采用歷史學與國際關系學相結合的研究方法,以“北寇八年”為代表的日俄軍事沖突及其《下田條約》等史實為探討問題的出發(fā)點,得出了“《下田條約》中的領土條款是日俄雙方在軍事實力暫時處于均衡,及為了達成雙方各自不同外交目的的前提下,所達成的暫時性的‘諒解備忘錄’性質(zhì)的領土協(xié)議”的結論。
[Abstract]:Japanese and Russian territory is a turbulent time, both in Japan and from the point of view of the development of world history. In this period, the problems of Japan and Russia were particularly striking and had a profound influence on the relations between the two countries. This article tries to make an objective analysis and judgment on the origin of the territorial problems between Japan and Russia on the basis of the research results of the first territorial agreement, the first territorial agreement, "the land Treaty of sada", which was carried out by the end of the Russian two countries around the Northern Territory.
This article is divided into three chapters. The first chapter expounds the initial expansion of Japan and Russia in the northern islands. This chapter, starting with the formal contact between the two countries for the first time, aims to find out the desire of the two countries to occupy the Northern Territory and the intention of expansion.
The second chapter expounds the military conflict between Japan and Russia. This chapter begins with the contradiction between Japan and Russia in the initial contact and analyses the process of transforming into military conflict, in order to discuss what role the military forces of the two countries have played in solving the problems of the northern territory at that time.
The third chapter mainly analyzes the diplomatic strategy of the two countries. Starting with the Russian and American customs, this chapter discusses the diplomatic policy of the two countries, the influence of the different strategies on the treaty and the military posture of the two parties at that time in the process of reaching the treaty between the two countries and the military posture of the two parties at that time. And what is the effect of the Treaty on the treaty between the two countries, and the northern territory of the two countries after the treaty has been reached. The status of the dispute is further analyzed, and finally the nature of the treaty is reasonably judged.
On the premise of mastering a large number of Russian and Japanese first-hand data, this paper uses the research method of history and international relations, and takes the historical facts as the Japanese Russian military conflict and the Nadu treaty, represented by the "eight years of the northern invaders" as the starting point, and draws the conclusion that the territory clause in the NPF is the temporary military strength of both Japan and Russia. The conclusion of a territorial agreement on the nature of the "memorandum of understanding", on the basis of equilibrium, and in order to achieve the different diplomatic purposes of both sides.

【學位授予單位】：東北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K14

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 高福順;李明娟;;日俄對庫頁島的爭奪[J];東北史地;2008年01期

2 郝承敦;俄日北方領土爭端述評[J];國際論壇;2000年01期

3 王珊;日俄北方領土問題[J];國際資料信息;2000年10期

4 劉桂玲;俄日關系的歷史回顧[J];國際資料信息;2003年04期

5 胡益祥;沙俄向北太平洋的擴張與日本北方領土問題[J];河南師大學報(社會科學版);1983年01期

6 孫健;日俄領土爭端與日俄關系[J];解放軍外語學院學報;1993年05期

7 姜毅;;在“西方化”和“東方化”之間(上)——俄羅斯文化與俄羅斯的變革[J];世界知識;1997年19期

，

本文編號：1799118