本文選題：古代科林斯　切入點：伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭　出處：《華東師范大學》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭(公元前431-404年)作為古代希臘世界最為著名的兩次戰(zhàn)爭之一,持續(xù)了長達27年的時間。究竟是什么原因引發(fā)了這場戰(zhàn)爭,是什么動力使之持續(xù)了二十七年?對于這個問題,中外學者主要集中在對雅典、斯巴達兩個城邦的研究,但是對科林斯等城邦的研究少之又少。 作為工商業(yè)較為發(fā)達的幾個城邦之一,科林斯加入伯羅奔尼撒同盟。而同盟中的斯巴達自恃國力強盛,幾度以犧牲同盟城邦利益來發(fā)展自己的勢力,所以科林斯與斯巴達之間不可避免的會有很多矛盾。那么為什么在伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭中,科林斯會站在斯巴達一邊,且成為反對以雅典為首的提洛同盟的主力?事實上,科林斯與雅典之間存在更為嚴重的沖突。雅典與麥加拉的結(jié)盟是其關(guān)系緊張的開始,伊庇丹努爭端和科西拉事件激化了二者日益積聚的矛盾,最終引起雅典帝國和伯羅奔尼撒同盟之間的戰(zhàn)爭——伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭。科林斯與雅典在西西里和科西拉之間的利益爭奪,以及其與阿爾哥斯的假結(jié)盟,將斯巴達等其他同盟城邦卷入其中,使戰(zhàn)爭成為世界古代史歷時最久的一個。 本文試從科林斯這一新的研究角度,對伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭進行再認識。 全文由緒論、正文和結(jié)語三部分組成: 緒論主要介紹了有關(guān)伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭爆發(fā)以及持續(xù)二十七年的原因的國內(nèi)外研究概況,說明了本文的寫作基礎(chǔ)以及新意。 正文第一章寫古代科林斯的概況,從農(nóng)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、手工業(yè)和造船技術(shù)三個方面分析科林斯對外關(guān)系發(fā)展的背景。 第二章介紹科林斯在加入伯羅奔尼撒同盟后至伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭爆發(fā)前期的對外政策,通過分析它與雅典、斯巴達關(guān)系的演變,與雅典矛盾的積累和與斯巴達關(guān)系的若即若離,推測它在即將爆發(fā)的伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭中的政策演變。 第三章主要講述科林斯與伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭的爆發(fā)。圍繞著伊庇丹努爭端和科西拉事件而發(fā)生的科林斯與雅典之間的爭奪戰(zhàn)成為戰(zhàn)爭的導火線,科林斯與雅典之間的局部戰(zhàn)爭擴大為兩個同盟之間的較量。 第四章介紹伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭中的科林斯。對科林斯在伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭過程中的作用作了梳理。科林斯與雅典的之間的白熱化對抗主要集中在對西西里地區(qū)和科西拉的爭奪上。雖然最終雅典被打敗了,但是科林斯并未如愿以償,斯巴達重新扶持雅典的政策再一次與科林斯的利益形成了對抗。 結(jié)語部分對科林斯在伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭的影響進行了總結(jié)性概括。
[Abstract]:The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC), one of the most famous wars in the ancient Greek world, lasted for 27 years.What caused the war and what motivated it to last for twenty-seven years?For this problem, Chinese and foreign scholars mainly focus on Athens and Spartan city-states, but rarely on Corinthian and other city-states.As one of the more developed city-states, Collins joined the Peloponnesian League.Sparta in the alliance, relying on the strength of the country, several times to sacrifice the interests of the Alliance city-states to develop their own power, so Collins and Sparta will inevitably have a lot of contradictions.So why, in the Peloponnesian War, did Collins stand by Sparta and become the main force against the Athenian Tiloh League?In fact, there was a more serious conflict between Collins and Athens.The alliance between Athens and Mcgarrah was the beginning of the tension in their relations. The dispute of Ibeidanu and the incident of Corsula intensified the increasingly accumulated contradictions between the Athenian Empire and the Peloponnesian Confederacy-the Peloponnesian War.Collins's rivalry with Athens in Sicily and Corsula, as well as its false alliance with Algos, involved other allied city-states such as Sparta, making the war one of the longest in the world's ancient history.This paper attempts to re-understand the Peloponnesian War from the perspective of Collins.The full text consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion:The introduction mainly introduces the domestic and foreign research situation about the outbreak of Peloponnesian War and its causes lasting 27 years, and explains the writing basis and new ideas of this paper.The first chapter describes the general situation of ancient Collins and analyzes the background of Collins' external relations from three aspects: agricultural structure, handicraft industry and shipbuilding technology.The second chapter introduces the foreign policy of Collins from joining the Peloponnesian League to the early stage of the Peloponnesian War. By analyzing the evolution of its relations with Athens and Sparta, the accumulation of contradictions with Athens and the relations between Sparta and Spartan.Speculate on its policy evolution in the forthcoming Peloponnesian War.The third chapter is about the outbreak of the War between Collins and Peloponnesian.The battle between Collins and Athens, which revolved around the Ibeedanu dispute and the Kosilla incident, became the trigger of the war, and the local war between Collins and Athens expanded into a battle between the two allies.Chapter four introduces Collins in Peloponnesian War.The role of Collins in the Peloponnesian War was sorted out.The bitter rivalry between Collins and Athens focused on Sicily and Corsella.Although Athens was defeated in the end, Collins did not get what he wanted, and Spartan's policy of resuscitating Athens once again confronts Collins' interests.The conclusion part summarizes the influence of Collins in Peloponnesian War.
【學位授予單位】：華東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：K125

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 黃英賢;伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭是奴隸制帝國爭霸的產(chǎn)物[J];華南師范大學學報(社會科學版);1985年01期

2 劉雯芳;誰是伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭爆發(fā)的責任者[J];廣西社會科學;2004年01期

3 劉耀星;;淺析雅典在伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭中失敗的原因[J];和田師范專科學校學報;2007年02期

4 繆鴻孺;金萍;;雅典和斯巴達城邦的政體及啟示[J];江西教育學院學報(綜合);2006年06期

5 裴雯;試論古典時代雅典的糧食進口問題[J];蘭州大學學報;2001年03期

6 李長林;;修昔底德和《伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭史》[J];歷史教學;1984年01期

，

本文編號：1724919