本文選題：論批評(píng) + 批評(píng)方式�。� 參考：《民族藝術(shù)》2017年04期

【摘要】：正"構(gòu)建一種批評(píng)",這個(gè)說法其實(shí)有點(diǎn)"說大話":一種真正有價(jià)值和有效的批評(píng)方式,豈是十幾篇文章和一個(gè)人讀了幾本書就能完成的?反映論批評(píng)歷經(jīng)千年風(fēng)雨,作為一種批評(píng)方式至今不是仍在探索和發(fā)展嗎?一個(gè)后學(xué)小子,就膽大妄為地提倡一種"批評(píng)方式",當(dāng)然是不自量力的。所以,我在這里講"寓言論批評(píng)",更多的是想探討一種"設(shè)想",通過總結(jié)自己批評(píng)寫作和批評(píng)研究的思考,來總結(jié)一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)瑣碎的經(jīng)驗(yàn),嘗試可否
[Abstract]:Is "building a criticism", which is actually a bit of a "big talk": a truly valuable and effective way of criticism, is a dozen articles and a few people read a few books to complete? Reflection criticism has gone through thousands of years, as a way of criticism is not still exploring and developing? A late-school boy, boldly advocating a "way of criticism", is of course out of control. So, I'm going to talk about "fable criticism" here, and I want to explore a kind of "assumption", which sums up a little bit of trivial experience by summing up my own critical writing and critical research, and trying to see if I can.
【作者單位】： 南開大學(xué)文學(xué)院;南開大學(xué)城市文化研究院;南開大學(xué)中文系;南開大學(xué)東方審美文化研究中心;南開大學(xué)語文教育研究中心;《中國圖書評(píng)論》;
【基金】：國家社科基金一般項(xiàng)目“批判理論視野下的當(dāng)代中國文化批評(píng)研究”(13BZW006)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：G02
，

本文編號(hào)：2022649