本文選題：當(dāng)代俄羅斯 + 外交學(xué)��； 參考：《外交學(xué)院》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)90年代初冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,國(guó)際環(huán)境發(fā)生深刻變革并對(duì)現(xiàn)代外交實(shí)踐產(chǎn)生深遠(yuǎn)影響。俄羅斯身處劇變中心,國(guó)際環(huán)境和國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)實(shí)的雙重變化以及“新思維”的傳播和西學(xué)的涌入成為當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交學(xué)形成和發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)土壤和思想來(lái)源。當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交學(xué)是對(duì)蘇聯(lián)外交理論和實(shí)踐的反思、與西方外交學(xué)的借鑒和對(duì)話。研究這一劇變后形成的外交學(xué)對(duì)我國(guó)來(lái)說(shuō)不無(wú)現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和學(xué)術(shù)意義。國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交實(shí)踐問(wèn)題,雖多有研究,而對(duì)當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交學(xué)理論方面卻幾乎無(wú)人問(wèn)津。這為本課題留下充分的研究空間。 本文運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)研究法和比較研究法,以梳理當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交學(xué)研究現(xiàn)狀為切入點(diǎn),重點(diǎn)對(duì)當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交學(xué)領(lǐng)域兩位代表性人物及其著述進(jìn)行梳理,并對(duì)其研究重點(diǎn)逐一進(jìn)行評(píng)析,從而評(píng)述當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交學(xué)研究現(xiàn)狀,揭示其學(xué)術(shù)特征,總結(jié)其學(xué)術(shù)貢獻(xiàn)、分析其學(xué)術(shù)局限、探討其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 以波波夫?yàn)榇淼睦弦淮饨粚W(xué)研究者和以佐諾娃為代表的年輕一代學(xué)者人生經(jīng)歷、學(xué)術(shù)經(jīng)歷迥異:波波夫代表的老一代外交學(xué)研究者普遍兼具外交實(shí)踐和學(xué)術(shù)研究經(jīng)歷,即由外交家而轉(zhuǎn)為外交學(xué)家。佐諾娃代表的年輕一代外交學(xué)者普遍沒(méi)有顯著的外交實(shí)踐,學(xué)術(shù)經(jīng)歷由學(xué)生而為學(xué)者。由此導(dǎo)致二者的代表作《現(xiàn)代外交:理論與實(shí)踐》和《現(xiàn)代外交模式:形成的起源與發(fā)展的前景》的思想來(lái)源和研究視角各有側(cè)重。《現(xiàn)代外交:理論與實(shí)踐》的學(xué)術(shù)思想來(lái)源以對(duì)蘇聯(lián)時(shí)期外交實(shí)踐和理論的反思為主,兼有對(duì)俄羅斯獨(dú)立之初外交實(shí)踐的反思和對(duì)西方早期外交學(xué)著作的借鑒,研究視角較為傳統(tǒng);《現(xiàn)代外交模式:形成的起源與發(fā)展的前景》的學(xué)術(shù)思想來(lái)源以西方現(xiàn)代外交學(xué)文獻(xiàn)為主,兼有對(duì)俄羅斯獨(dú)立之初外交實(shí)踐的反思,研究視角比較符合學(xué)術(shù)前沿。二者著作雖然各有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值及其研究的局限性,但從整體上代表了當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交學(xué)當(dāng)前的研究方向和水平。 當(dāng)代俄羅斯外交學(xué)表現(xiàn)出了非學(xué)派且無(wú)流派、反思性與去意識(shí)形態(tài)化、西方化與單向性的總體學(xué)術(shù)特征;其學(xué)術(shù)貢獻(xiàn)在于突破了蘇聯(lián)外交學(xué)話語(yǔ)體系,開(kāi)啟了俄羅斯“新外交學(xué)”研究;因理論發(fā)展時(shí)間尚短,學(xué)術(shù)研究的角度、廣度、深度、清晰度、可證度方面尚存在一定程度的局限,但進(jìn)一步研究空間明顯,學(xué)術(shù)前景值得期待。
[Abstract]:Since the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, the international environment has undergone profound changes and has a profound impact on the practice of modern diplomacy. Russia is in the center of dramatic change, the dual changes of international environment and domestic reality, the spread of "new thinking" and the influx of western studies have become the realistic soil and ideological source for the formation and development of contemporary Russian diplomacy. Contemporary Russian diplomacy is a reflection of Soviet diplomatic theory and practice, and a reference and dialogue with western diplomacy. The study of diplomacy formed after this upheaval is of practical and academic significance to our country. Although scholars at home and abroad have studied the practice of contemporary Russian diplomacy, almost no one has paid attention to the theory of contemporary Russian diplomacy. This leaves sufficient research space for this subject. This paper uses literature research and comparative research to comb the current situation of contemporary Russian diplomatic studies, focusing on the two representative figures in the field of contemporary Russian diplomacy and their writings. The research emphasis is analyzed one by one, so as to comment on the present situation of diplomatic studies in contemporary Russia, reveal its academic characteristics, sum up its academic contributions, analyze its academic limitations, and discuss its practical significance. The academic experiences of the older generation of diplomatic researchers represented by Popov and the younger generation of scholars represented by Zonova are quite different: the former generation of diplomatic researchers represented by Popov generally have both diplomatic practice and academic research experience. From a diplomat to a diplomat. The younger generation of diplomatic scholars represented by Zonova generally have no significant diplomatic practice. As a result, their masterpieces "Modern diplomacy: theory and practice" and "Modern diplomatic Model: the Origin and Development prospects of formation" have their respective ideological sources and research perspectives. The main source of academic thought is the reflection of diplomatic practice and theory during the Soviet period. It also reflects on the diplomatic practice of Russia at the beginning of its independence and draws lessons from the early works of diplomacy in the West. The academic thought of Modern diplomacy: the Origin and Development Prospect of formation is mainly from the western modern diplomatic literature, and it also reflects on the diplomatic practice of Russia at the beginning of independence. The perspective of research is more in line with the academic frontier. Although their works have practical significance and academic value as well as their limitations, they represent the current research direction and level of contemporary Russian diplomacy as a whole. Contemporary Russian diplomacy shows the overall academic characteristics of non-school and no school, reflection and deideology, westernization and unidirectionality, and its academic contribution lies in breaking through the discourse system of Soviet diplomacy. The study of "new diplomacy" in Russia has been initiated. Because the period of theoretical development is still short, the angle, breadth, depth, clarity and verifiability of academic research are still limited to a certain extent, but the space for further study is obvious. The academic future is worth looking forward to.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D851.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉文祥;論聯(lián)合國(guó)的預(yù)防性外交[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2005年01期

2 姜毅;俄羅斯的國(guó)際地位與外交政策選擇[J];東歐中亞研究;2002年03期

3 王輝;美國(guó)對(duì)外干預(yù)的新趨向[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

4 朱素梅;二十世紀(jì)外交方式的演進(jìn)[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年03期

5 蘇長(zhǎng)和;陳玉剛;劉鴻武;馬麗蓉;陳志敏;錢皓;張建新;孫德剛;葉青;汪段泳;朱杰進(jìn);李明明;;中國(guó)外交研究的新領(lǐng)域、新議程、新機(jī)遇[J];國(guó)際觀察;2010年01期

6 汪寧;;俄羅斯國(guó)際組織外交的幾個(gè)特點(diǎn)[J];國(guó)際觀察;2010年02期

7 倪峰;對(duì)多邊主義理論構(gòu)成的一些探索[J];國(guó)際論壇;2004年06期

8 德福安,徐鶴鳴;歐盟與中國(guó)聯(lián)合推進(jìn)多邊主義及發(fā)展模式的多樣性[J];國(guó)際問(wèn)題研究;2004年03期

9 祖立超;;國(guó)內(nèi)俄羅斯能源外交研究綜述[J];國(guó)際資料信息;2008年07期

10 方向勤;;預(yù)防性外交:基于概念的比較分析[J];國(guó)際政治研究;2007年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 荊喜雙;斯大林時(shí)期蘇聯(lián)東正教會(huì)與國(guó)家政權(quán)關(guān)系問(wèn)題初探（1924-1953年）[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2084335