本文選題：中國崛起 + 歐盟��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：近幾年,中國的快速發(fā)展和國際地位的不斷提高,在國際社會(huì)上的影響力也在逐漸增強(qiáng),但是我們所面臨的國際環(huán)境卻并不樂觀,尤其是以歐美為代表的大國,對于中國的崛起充滿疑慮�，F(xiàn)實(shí)主義者認(rèn)為一個(gè)大國的崛起必然會(huì)尋求與其實(shí)力相適應(yīng)的國際權(quán)力,不論是在經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治還是在國際秩序及制度上的要求,如果需要,可能會(huì)發(fā)動(dòng)戰(zhàn)爭來獲得自身利益。對于未來的中國在國際社會(huì)上會(huì)是以怎樣的身份來參與國際事務(wù),不同的國家有著不同的立場和態(tài)度。但是作為國際規(guī)范倡導(dǎo)者和維護(hù)者的歐盟及美國,對于中國未來可能對國際規(guī)范、國際秩序所造成的威脅充滿了恐懼。他們不希望一個(gè)挑戰(zhàn)權(quán)威的大國的崛起。面對中國的威脅,歐盟及美國在近幾年在對中國及亞太的政策方面都做了重大的調(diào)整。對于中國,歐盟主要是通過歐盟委員會(huì)的各種提案來干涉中國的內(nèi)政,通過各種問題來牽制中國的力量,通過經(jīng)貿(mào)關(guān)系對中國進(jìn)行限制,在亞洲方面實(shí)施均衡策略。而美國則更多的是通過其軍事力量,對中國進(jìn)行威脅和牽制,在朝鮮半島問題上,美國實(shí)行積極的軍事政策,在中國南海對中國進(jìn)行海上包圍,在亞太戰(zhàn)略上,加強(qiáng)與亞太地區(qū)的聯(lián)系,增強(qiáng)其在地區(qū)影響力,防止中國在亞太地區(qū)的霸權(quán)建立。 面對世界主要力量對中國的遏制,中國不僅應(yīng)該對自己有正確的認(rèn)識,更應(yīng)該關(guān)注世界各國對我們的認(rèn)知和關(guān)注。雖然近幾年,我們一直強(qiáng)調(diào)和平發(fā)展,但是我們應(yīng)該考慮到世界其他國家是否承認(rèn)或者相信未來中國是一個(gè)遵守國際規(guī)范和秩序的國家。尤其是作為一個(gè)被西方發(fā)達(dá)國家認(rèn)為是非民主國家的大國,這種擔(dān)憂也并不是沒有道理的。因此我們現(xiàn)在所面臨的問題也是中國外交中的困境,那就是如何讓世界相信中國是一個(gè)和平的力量。這就需要我們在加強(qiáng)對外宣傳,加強(qiáng)交流溝通,以及大力發(fā)展公共外交,樹立中國的國際形象等方面做很大的努力。在很多時(shí)候我們要改變政策很容易,但是要改變輿論認(rèn)識卻很難。在加強(qiáng)國際社會(huì)對中國的認(rèn)識方面,發(fā)揮我國的軟實(shí)力非常重要。尤其是以中國古代文化為代表的軟實(shí)力,是我們在打開世界認(rèn)識中國大門的重要的鑰匙。本文筆者,主要論述歐盟對中國崛起的認(rèn)知,認(rèn)知變化過程中出現(xiàn)的問題,并分析了導(dǎo)致這些問題的原因,接下來分析歐盟對中國政策的研究,包括歐盟對中國的政策趨向,以及歐盟制定對中國政策的形成原因。最后筆者通過對當(dāng)今中歐關(guān)系發(fā)展的特征,未來的發(fā)展趨勢以及應(yīng)該怎樣應(yīng)對歐盟政策,提出筆者基本觀點(diǎn)和看法,希望能為中歐雙邊關(guān)系的發(fā)展提供一種視角和一些啟示。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of China and the continuous improvement of its international status, its influence in the international community has gradually increased, but the international environment we are facing is not optimistic, especially the big countries represented by Europe and the United States. Full of misgivings about China's rise. The realists believe that the rise of a great power is bound to seek international power commensurate with its strength, whether in economic, political, international order and institutional requirements, and, if necessary, to wage war to gain its own interests. Different countries have different positions and attitudes on how China will participate in international affairs in the future. But the European Union and the United States, as advocates and defenders of international norms, are full of fears about the threat that China may pose to international norms and the international order in the future. They do not want the rise of a power that challenges authority. In the face of China's threat, the European Union and the United States have made major changes in their policies towards China and the Asia-Pacific region in recent years. For China, the EU mainly interferes in China's internal affairs through various proposals of the European Commission, restrains China's power through various issues, restricts China through economic and trade relations, and implements a balanced strategy in Asia. On the other hand, the United States is more likely to threaten and contain China through its military force. On the Korean Peninsula issue, the United States has implemented an active military policy, surrounded China at sea in the South China Sea, and strategically placed it in the Asia-Pacific region. Strengthen ties with the Asia-Pacific region, strengthen its influence in the region, and prevent the establishment of China's hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region. In the face of the containment of China by the world's major forces, China should not only have a correct understanding of itself, We should pay more attention to the cognition and concern of all countries in the world. Although we have been emphasizing peaceful development in recent years, we should consider whether the rest of the world recognizes or believes that China will be a country that adheres to international norms and order in the future. Nor are such fears unjustified, especially as a power considered undemocratic by Western developed countries. So the problem we are now facing is also the dilemma in China's diplomacy: how to convince the world that China is a force for peace. This requires us to make great efforts in strengthening foreign propaganda, strengthening communication, and vigorously developing public diplomacy and establishing China's international image. In many cases it is easy to change policy, but it is difficult to change public opinion. In strengthening the international community's understanding of China, it is very important to give play to China's soft power. Especially the soft power represented by ancient Chinese culture is an important key to our understanding of China. In this paper, the author mainly discusses the European Union's cognition of China's rise and the problems in the process of cognitive change, and analyzes the causes of these problems, and then analyzes the EU's research on China's policy, including the European Union's policy trend towards China. And the formation of EU policy towards China. Finally, the author puts forward the author's basic views and views on the characteristics of the development of China-EU relations, the future development trend and how to deal with the EU policy, hoping to provide a perspective and some enlightenment for the development of China-EU bilateral relations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D822.35

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 時(shí)殷弘;關(guān)于中國的大國地位及其形象的思考[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)評論;1999年Z5期

2 耿楓;20世紀(jì)90年代以來的中國與歐盟關(guān)系[J];國際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

3 吳白乙;后冷戰(zhàn)國際體系變動(dòng)與中歐關(guān)系[J];歐洲研究;2005年05期

4 郭關(guān)玉;;新現(xiàn)實(shí)主義、新自由主義和建構(gòu)主義關(guān)于國際合作的條件的理論述評[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2005年06期

5 李伯重;歷史上的經(jīng)濟(jì)革命與經(jīng)濟(jì)史的研究方法[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年06期

，

本文編號：1999919