本文選題：東亞 + 秩序轉(zhuǎn)型�。� 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束之后,東亞原有的安全秩序被打破,新的安全秩序還未建立起來(lái),而處于一個(gè)動(dòng)態(tài)演變的過(guò)程中 研究冷戰(zhàn)后的東亞安全秩序轉(zhuǎn)型,首先必須回顧與思考冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期的東亞安全秩序。二戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,雅爾塔體系形成了戰(zhàn)后東亞安全秩序的雛形。隨著冷戰(zhàn)大幕的拉開,美蘇在東亞通過(guò)一系列雙邊協(xié)議建立各自的同盟體系,謀求各自的地區(qū)安全利益,使東亞形成了美蘇均勢(shì)狀態(tài)下的爭(zhēng)霸秩序。這種安全秩序帶有意識(shí)形態(tài)尖銳對(duì)立、政治軍事對(duì)抗嚴(yán)重、地緣政治利益爭(zhēng)奪激烈等特點(diǎn),其一方面制約了日本右翼勢(shì)力,在客觀上起到了維護(hù)東亞穩(wěn)定的作用；另一方面也產(chǎn)生了消極影響,尤其是冷戰(zhàn)思維、國(guó)家分裂與民族對(duì)抗、舊有的安全結(jié)構(gòu)與行為規(guī)則等,不僅惡化了東亞地區(qū)安全與發(fā)展環(huán)境,而且影響了冷戰(zhàn)后東亞安全秩序轉(zhuǎn)型。 冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,在全球安全局勢(shì)變動(dòng)的大背景下,東亞各行為體基于自身實(shí)力對(duì)比變化作出了戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整。在調(diào)整過(guò)程中,各行為體就東亞地區(qū)安全問(wèn)題發(fā)生碰撞與互動(dòng),合作安全因此成為積極應(yīng)對(duì)各種復(fù)雜安全挑戰(zhàn)的解決之道,強(qiáng)化了東亞各行為體互相聯(lián)系的利益紐帶,從而提高了合作安全解決各種安全困難的能力,使東亞安全共同體逐漸成為一個(gè)有著明確而宏大目標(biāo)的地區(qū)安全秩序愿景。在推進(jìn)東亞安全秩序轉(zhuǎn)型的過(guò)程中,一方面,地區(qū)行為體利益交匯、安全合作與經(jīng)濟(jì)合作成為重要的驅(qū)動(dòng)力；另一方面,東亞客觀上仍然存在著諸如領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端、朝鮮半島問(wèn)題、歷史遺留問(wèn)題等眾多導(dǎo)致各國(guó)對(duì)抗和沖突的不確定因素,使東亞安全秩序轉(zhuǎn)型面臨阻力。 轉(zhuǎn)型中的東亞安全秩序?qū)推结绕鸬闹袊?guó)至關(guān)重要,而中國(guó)也將在東亞安全秩序轉(zhuǎn)型中發(fā)揮重要作用。中國(guó)一方面積極發(fā)展雙邊關(guān)系,倡導(dǎo)安全合作,實(shí)踐建立信任措施,彰顯負(fù)責(zé)任大國(guó)的形象；另一方面在維護(hù)國(guó)家主權(quán)與領(lǐng)土完整的前提下,秉持“和平共處五項(xiàng)原則”,不失時(shí)機(jī)地處理與解決地區(qū)熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,發(fā)揮了作為一個(gè)地區(qū)大國(guó)的作用,維護(hù)了本區(qū)域的穩(wěn)定與發(fā)展。在東亞安全秩序轉(zhuǎn)型的漫長(zhǎng)道路上,中國(guó)要與東亞地區(qū)其他國(guó)家一起,逐漸明確安全合作方向,以政治互信為基石,以務(wù)實(shí)合作為抓手,以安全建設(shè)為保障,以彼此共贏為目標(biāo),以政策透明為前提,不斷提升戰(zhàn)略協(xié)調(diào)及磋商的機(jī)制化水平,培養(yǎng)共享安全價(jià)值觀,構(gòu)建和平、繁榮、惠及各方的東亞安全秩序。
[Abstract]:After the end of the Cold War, the old security order in East Asia was broken, and the new security order was not established, but was in the process of dynamic evolution. To study the transformation of security order in East Asia after the Cold War, we must first review and think about the security order in East Asia during the Cold War. After World War II, the Yalta system formed the embryonic form of the postwar East Asian security order. With the opening of the Cold War, the United States and Soviet Union established their own alliance system through a series of bilateral agreements in East Asia, seeking their own regional security interests, so that East Asia formed the hegemony order under the balance of power between the United States and the Soviet Union. This kind of security order is characterized by sharp opposition of ideology, serious political and military confrontation and fierce competition for geopolitical interests. On the one hand, it restricts the right-wing forces in Japan and objectively plays a role in maintaining stability in East Asia. On the other hand, it has also had a negative impact, especially on the Cold War mentality, state division and ethnic confrontation, the old security structure and rules of conduct, etc., which not only worsened the security and development environment in East Asia, Moreover, it affected the transformation of security order in East Asia after the cold war. After the end of the Cold War, under the background of the change of global security situation, various actors in East Asia made strategic adjustment based on the change of their own strength. In the process of adjustment, various actors collide and interact on the security issues in East Asia, thus cooperative security becomes a solution to various complex security challenges and strengthens the interest ties between the various actors in East Asia. Thus, the ability of cooperative security to solve various security difficulties has been improved, and the East Asian Security Community has gradually become a vision of regional security order with clear and ambitious goals. In the process of promoting the transformation of the security order in East Asia, on the one hand, the interests of regional actors converge, and security cooperation and economic cooperation become an important driving force; on the other hand, there still exist objectively such issues as territorial disputes and the Korean Peninsula issue in East Asia. Many uncertain factors, such as historical problems, which lead to confrontation and conflict in East Asia, make the transition of East Asian security order face resistance. The East Asian security order in transition is very important to the peaceful rise of China, and China will also play an important role in the transformation of East Asian security order. On the one hand, China actively develops bilateral relations, advocates security cooperation, practices confidence-building measures, and demonstrates the image of a responsible power; on the other hand, while safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, it upholds the "five principles of peaceful coexistence." We should seize the opportunity to deal with and solve regional hot issues, play a role as a regional power, and maintain the stability and development of the region. On the long road leading to the transformation of the security order in East Asia, China, together with other countries in the East Asian region, should gradually define the direction of security cooperation, take political mutual trust as its cornerstone, take practical cooperation as its starting point, and take security construction as its guarantee. Taking mutual win-win as the goal and the policy transparency as the premise, we should constantly improve the institutional level of strategic coordination and consultation, cultivate shared security values, build peace and prosperity, and benefit the security order of East Asia.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D829

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱芹;;周邊大國(guó)在交叉承認(rèn)韓朝問(wèn)題上的博弈[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

2 盛海燕;;俄羅斯在朝鮮半島:現(xiàn)狀及前景[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

3 劉昌明;李昕蕾;;地區(qū)主義與東亞秩序的轉(zhuǎn)型趨向[J];東北亞論壇;2007年05期

4 唐彥林;;奧巴馬政府東亞政策的調(diào)整及中國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)[J];東北亞論壇;2010年02期

5 倪峰;霸權(quán)穩(wěn)定模式與東亞地區(qū)政治安全秩序[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2002年07期

6 徐秀軍;;地區(qū)主義與地區(qū)秩序構(gòu)建:一種分析框架[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2010年02期

7 劉豐;;安全預(yù)期、經(jīng)濟(jì)收益與東亞安全秩序[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2011年03期

8 劉阿明;;東亞共同體建設(shè):關(guān)于現(xiàn)狀與問(wèn)題的思考[J];東南亞研究;2010年01期

9 鄭先武;;“東亞共同體”的虛幻愿景[J];東南亞之窗;2007年01期

10 孫東方;;變動(dòng)中的東亞經(jīng)濟(jì)格局與“中國(guó)—東盟”自貿(mào)區(qū)戰(zhàn)略[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前7條

1 朱鋒 北京大學(xué)國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院教授;[N];中國(guó)國(guó)防報(bào);2011年

2 林東 李瞰;[N];國(guó)防時(shí)報(bào);2011年

3 北京大學(xué)國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院副院長(zhǎng) 賈慶國(guó)　教授;[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

4 記者 白潔　林瓊;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

5 鄭興　葛妍;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào)海外版;2011年

6 上海社科院亞太所東北亞研究室主任、研究員 高蘭;[N];文匯報(bào);2011年

7 新華社記者;[N];新華每日電訊;2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 汪權(quán);冷戰(zhàn)后的美國(guó)朝鮮半島政策析論[D];中共中央黨校;2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 黃金元;國(guó)家系統(tǒng)安全理論初探[D];國(guó)防科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2005年

2 廉香蓮;中國(guó)的東北亞區(qū)域發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略與東北亞區(qū)域合作[D];延邊大學(xué);2006年

3 高升;從新國(guó)家安全觀的角度解讀上海合作組織的成功實(shí)踐[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

4 辛軍;當(dāng)代國(guó)家安全的挑戰(zhàn)與危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

5 張照雷;冷戰(zhàn)后東亞國(guó)際秩序轉(zhuǎn)型的中國(guó)因素[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

6 湯傳文;中國(guó)在東亞地區(qū)的安全環(huán)境研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2009年

7 田春耕;日美同盟的歷史進(jìn)程、發(fā)展趨勢(shì)及其對(duì)東亞安全的影響[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

8 成克齡;和諧世界思想與東亞安全合作戰(zhàn)略[D];國(guó)防科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2009年

9 黃春景;東亞區(qū)域合作與中日關(guān)系的互動(dòng)研究[D];中南大學(xué);2010年

10 趙俊華;民族利益與國(guó)家利益關(guān)系研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1982865