本文選題：伙伴關(guān)系 + 中美外交�。� 參考：《外交學(xué)院》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：本論文主要就中美“伙伴關(guān)系”外交進(jìn)行了比較研究。首先從國際格局、地區(qū)和全球戰(zhàn)略穩(wěn)定以及國家間關(guān)系中的“伙伴關(guān)系”三個角度，對“伙伴關(guān)系”的理論內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了分析和梳理�！盎锇殛P(guān)系”是指國際關(guān)系行為體間為尋求共同利益而建立的一種合作關(guān)系。在“協(xié)調(diào)型”的國際格局下國家之間一般不存在針對性的“伙伴關(guān)系”。戰(zhàn)略穩(wěn)定不再局限于軍事層面，而拓展至政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)和文化等領(lǐng)域，它與地緣政治的關(guān)系是十分密切的，“地緣重心國”決定著未來國際體系的穩(wěn)定與發(fā)展�！盎锇殛P(guān)系”外交共分為三類，以“結(jié)盟”為特征的“聯(lián)盟型伙伴關(guān)系”、以“不結(jié)盟”為原則的“普遍型伙伴關(guān)系”、以“制衡對手”為目的的“對手式伙伴關(guān)系”。決定“伙伴關(guān)系”的變量主要有三種，即自變量、因變量和干預(yù)變量。自變量主要有國際體系、國際格局，，國家性質(zhì)、利益和實力等；因變量分別是國際形勢、國家關(guān)系的緊密度等；干預(yù)變量則是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人態(tài)度、突發(fā)事件及第三方國的變化等。在厘清“伙伴關(guān)系”理論內(nèi)涵的基礎(chǔ)上，建立了一般性“伙伴關(guān)系”外交理論分析框架。在學(xué)理上，“伙伴關(guān)系”又可以分為“積極伙伴關(guān)系”、“相對積極伙伴關(guān)系”、“相對消極伙伴關(guān)系”和“消極伙伴關(guān)系”。據(jù)此，本論文對中美兩國“伙伴關(guān)系”的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r進(jìn)行了梳理與比較研究，努力揭示出中美雙方的特征，構(gòu)建了兩國“伙伴關(guān)系”外交的分析模型，包括影響因素、體系構(gòu)成和功能效應(yīng)等模型。中美雙方“伙伴關(guān)系”外交的主要差異分別表現(xiàn)在“無針對性”與“有針對性”、“無敵國”與“有敵國”、“聚和型”與“擴(kuò)張型”、“普遍型為主”與“聯(lián)盟型為主”等。本論文還從戰(zhàn)略學(xué)的角度對中美兩國“伙伴關(guān)系”的相互認(rèn)知差異以及中美兩國對雙邊“伙伴關(guān)系”的認(rèn)知差異進(jìn)行了深入的分析。
[Abstract]:This thesis makes a comparative study on the relationship between China and the United States. Firstly, from three angles of international pattern, regional and global strategic stability and "partnership" in inter-state relations, the theoretical connotation of "partnership" is analyzed and sorted out. "Partnership" refers to a cooperative relationship between international relations actors in pursuit of common interests. In the "coordinated" international pattern, there is generally no targeted "partnership" between countries. Strategic stability is no longer confined to military level, but extends to political, economic and cultural fields. Its relationship with geopolitics is very close. The "geopolitical center of gravity" determines the stability and development of the future international system. "Partnership" diplomacy is divided into three categories: "alliance partnership" characterized by "alliance", "universal partnership" based on "non-alignment" principle, and "rival partnership" with the aim of "counterbalancing adversary". There are three kinds of variables that determine partnership: independent variable, dependent variable and intervention variable. Independent variables are mainly international system, international pattern, national nature, interests and strength; dependent variables are the international situation and the closeness of state relations; intervention variables are the attitude of leaders, unexpected events and changes in third countries. On the basis of clarifying the connotation of "partnership" theory, this paper establishes a general "partnership" diplomatic theoretical analysis framework. In theory, "partnership" can be divided into "positive partnership", "relative negative partnership" and "negative partnership". On the basis of this, this paper makes a comparative study on the development of the "partnership" between China and the United States, tries to reveal the characteristics of the two countries, and constructs an analytical model of the "partnership" diplomacy between the two countries, including the influencing factors. System structure and functional effects. The main differences of the "partnership" diplomacy between China and the United States are shown in "untargeted" and "targeted", "invincible country" and "enemy state", "convergence type" and "expansion type", "universal type" and "alliance type mainly" and so on. From the perspective of strategy, this paper also makes a deep analysis of the cognitive differences between China and the United States on the "partnership" between China and the United States, as well as the cognitive differences between the two countries on the bilateral "partnership".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D822.371.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王貴鋒,胡吉良;論江澤民的伙伴外交戰(zhàn)略[J];社會主義研究;2005年03期

2 門洪華;中國外交哲學(xué)的演變[J];教學(xué)與研究;2005年04期

3 寧騷;選擇伙伴戰(zhàn)略 營造伙伴關(guān)系──跨入21世紀(jì)的中國外交[J];新視野;2000年02期

4 潘振強(qiáng);關(guān)于重建全球戰(zhàn)略穩(wěn)定的理論思考[J];國際問題研究;2002年04期

5 金正昆;伙伴戰(zhàn)略:中國外交的理性抉擇[J];教學(xué)與研究;2000年07期

6 蘇浩;地緣重心與世界政治的支點[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2004年04期

本文編號：1979598