本文選題：參與進程 + 社會性克制�。� 參考：《外交學(xué)院》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：本文的核心問題是：為什么有的武裝組織放棄招募和使用兒童兵，選擇社會性克制呢？該問題源于經(jīng)驗現(xiàn)實的困惑。在當(dāng)代內(nèi)戰(zhàn)與武裝沖突中，兒童淪為武裝組織襲擊和招募的目標(biāo)。招募和使用兒童兵是武裝組織理性、現(xiàn)實的選擇。但是，越來越多的武裝組織選擇放棄招募和使用兒童兵，保持行為克制。武力打擊、法律威懾與懲罰、間接政治施壓和經(jīng)濟制裁有一定的作用，但是更容易激起武裝組織的反抗和報復(fù)，進而招募更多的兒童兵。 本文提出了以“參與進程”為核心概念的理論分析框架，旨在探討武裝組織選擇社會性克制的動力與進程問題。參與進程是指：行動者參加、維持和發(fā)展社會實踐與社會意義的動態(tài)關(guān)系。社會性克制是指：有能力、有意愿招募和使用兒童兵的武裝組織放棄招募和使用兒童兵，接受國際人道主義規(guī)范，保持自我行為克制。 本文假設(shè)：參與進程有助于說服武裝組織學(xué)習(xí)和接受新規(guī)范、放棄招募和使用兒童兵、保持行為克制。參與進程強調(diào)接觸、對話和談判，重視過程性因素。通過監(jiān)測和報告機制、制度設(shè)計兩大規(guī)范傳播機制，武裝組織在國際、國內(nèi)和平進程中的參與實踐有助于推動武裝組織學(xué)習(xí)新規(guī)范，催生信任與合作意識，重新界定行動意義與利益，進而導(dǎo)致漸進式變化，保持行為克制。此外，武裝組織的參與程度也影響其接受和遵守規(guī)范的程度。 本文選取了冷戰(zhàn)后布隆迪與烏干達境內(nèi)的武裝組織作為對比案例。布隆迪境內(nèi)的武裝組織主要是保衛(wèi)民主全國委員會—保衛(wèi)民主力量、胡圖人解放黨—民主解放力量。通過參與國際、國內(nèi)進程，他們最后都放棄招募和使用兒童，釋放了部隊內(nèi)的兒童兵，因此從“黑名單”中刪除。與此形成鮮明對比的案例是烏干達上帝抵抗軍。聯(lián)合國仍未同上帝抵抗軍進行直接接觸與對話，而烏干達人民國防軍的軍事行動宣告朱巴和平進程失敗。迄今，上帝抵抗軍仍在招募和使用兒童兵，并犯有殺戮、殘害、強奸等侵害兒童的罪行。上述案例表明，參與進程有助于說服武裝組織放棄招募和使用兒童兵，選擇社會性克制；在國際、國內(nèi)和平進程的參與程度越高，武裝組織越容易接受規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:The core question of this paper is: why did some armed groups abandon the recruitment and use of child soldiers and opt for social restraint? The problem stems from the confusion of empirical reality. In contemporary civil wars and armed conflicts, children are the targets of attacks and recruitment by armed groups. The recruitment and use of child soldiers is a rational and realistic choice for armed groups. However, an increasing number of armed groups are opting to forgo the recruitment and use of child soldiers and exercise restraint. Force strikes, legal deterrence and punishment, indirect political pressure and economic sanctions have a certain effect, but they are more likely to provoke resistance and retaliation by armed groups and thus recruit more child soldiers. In this paper, a theoretical analysis framework based on the concept of "participatory process" is proposed, which aims at exploring the motive force and process of the choice of social restraint by armed organizations. Participatory process refers to the participation, maintenance and development of the dynamic relationship between social practice and social significance. Social restraint means that armed organizations that have the ability and will to recruit and use child soldiers abandon the recruitment and use of child soldiers, accept international humanitarian norms, and exercise self-restraint. This paper assumes that participatory processes help to persuade armed groups to learn and accept new norms, to forgo the recruitment and use of child soldiers, and to exercise restraint. Participatory processes emphasize engagement, dialogue and negotiation, and focus on process factors. Through the monitoring and reporting mechanism, the system designs two major normative dissemination mechanisms. The participation of armed organizations in international and domestic peace processes helps to promote the armed organizations to learn new norms and to create a sense of trust and cooperation. Redefine the meaning and interests of action, and then lead to gradual change and exercise restraint. In addition, the level of participation of armed groups also affects their acceptance of and compliance with norms. This paper chooses the armed groups in Burundi and Uganda after the Cold War as a contrast case. The main armed groups in Burundi are CNDD-FDD, PAHUTU-FDLR. By participating in international and domestic processes, they eventually abandoned the recruitment and use of children and released child soldiers from the ranks, thus removing them from the "blacklist". In stark contrast, Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army (LRA). The United Nations has yet to engage in direct contact and dialogue with the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), while the UPDF military operation has failed the Juba peace process. To date, LRA continues to recruit and use child soldiers and commit crimes against children such as killing, maiming and rape. The above examples show that participatory processes help to persuade armed groups to abandon the recruitment and use of child soldiers and to opt for social restraint; at the international level, the greater the level of participation in the internal peace process, the easier it is for armed groups to accept norms.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D815

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 柳思思;;從規(guī)范進化到規(guī)范退化[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2010年03期

2 林民旺;朱立群;;國際規(guī)范的國內(nèi)化:國內(nèi)結(jié)構(gòu)的影響及傳播機制[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2011年01期

3 何志鵬;;國際法治視野內(nèi)的習(xí)慣國際人道法[J];東方法學(xué);2009年01期

4 朱文奇;;國際法追究個人刑事責(zé)任與管轄豁免問題[J];法學(xué);2006年09期

5 王洪濤;;國際政治視角下國際人道法在冷戰(zhàn)后的發(fā)展[J];國際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年06期

6 鐘龍彪;;國家社會化:國際關(guān)系的一項研究議程[J];歐洲研究;2009年02期

7 潘忠岐;非傳統(tǒng)安全問題的理論沖擊與困惑[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2004年03期

8 袁正清;建構(gòu)主義與外交政策分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2004年09期

9 袁正清;;交往行為理論與國際政治研究——以德國國際關(guān)系研究視角為中心的一項考察[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2006年09期

10 孫吉勝;;語言、身份與國際秩序:后建構(gòu)主義理論研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2008年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡文秀;論冷戰(zhàn)后國內(nèi)武裝沖突和平解決的影響因素[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2011年

，

本文編號：1957430