本文選題：涉緬刑事案件 + 外籍被告人　； 參考：《云南大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：云南邊境線長達4060公里,與東南亞的緬甸、老撾、越南三國接壤,隨著云南面向南亞東南亞橋頭堡建設重大戰(zhàn)略的深入實施,帶來了人流、物流、資金流的大流動,涉外刑事犯罪案件也隨之相應的增多,因而有必要對此類案件審理中遇到的問題進行研究。中緬兩國經(jīng)貿(mào)、人員交往日益頻繁,涉緬刑事案件逐漸增多,公檢法等部門在辦理涉緬刑事案件過程中辦案機制存在的問題逐一顯現(xiàn),人民法院審理這類案件中遇到的一系列訴訟程序上和實體處理上的法律問題也日趨突出和復雜。目前審理涉緬刑事案件的主要問題包括：一是在審理涉緬刑事案件過程中,經(jīng)常面臨被告人國籍、民族多樣,雙重國籍或無國籍,語言不一、不通等問題,對此類被告人服刑期滿,回歸社會,幫教等措施難以有效實施。若再次犯罪,其是否有前科或是否構成累犯難以查明,不利于預防打擊犯罪長效機制的建立。二是對身份不明的外籍未成年犯罪嫌疑人作案時的年齡往往無法準確認定,導致法院最終的量刑出現(xiàn)偏差；三是外籍犯罪嫌疑人種族、民族成分復雜,所使用的語言、方言千差萬別,難以聘請翻譯且水平參差不齊,導致犯罪嫌疑人的供述筆錄時有瑕疵；四是國際司法交流與合作機制不完善,取證困難,對境外轉換的證據(jù)是否采信存有疑惑；五是在侵犯公民人身權利的刑附民案件中,往往由于無法查實外籍被告人在國外的財產(chǎn)或雖在國外有財產(chǎn)但缺乏正式的司法協(xié)助執(zhí)行渠道而得不到執(zhí)行。本文希望通過分析法院審理涉緬刑事犯罪案件中出現(xiàn)的新情況和新問題,進行分析研究,提出相應對策,以求健全制度,妥善處理涉緬刑事案件,對于促進國際交往、保持睦鄰友好的中緬胞波情誼具有重要作用；同時也是轉變觀念,創(chuàng)新社會管理,發(fā)展邊疆經(jīng)濟,促進社會進步、邊民和諧提供強有力司法保障的需要。
[Abstract]:Yunnan's border line is 4060 kilometers long, bordering the three countries of Burma, Laos, and Vietnam in Southeast Asia. With the in-depth implementation of Yunnan's major strategy to build bridgeheads in Southeast Asia and South Asia, it has brought a great flow of people, logistics, and capital.Foreign-related criminal cases also increase correspondingly, so it is necessary to study the problems encountered in the trial of such cases.The economic and trade exchanges between China and Myanmar have become increasingly frequent, and the number of criminal cases involving Myanmar has gradually increased. The problems existing in the handling of criminal cases involving Myanmar by the Public Security Bureau, procuratorates, courts and other departments have emerged one by one.A series of legal problems encountered by people's courts in handling such cases have become increasingly prominent and complex.At present, the main issues in the trial of criminal cases involving Myanmar include: first, in the course of the trial of criminal cases involving Myanmar, they often face problems such as the nationality of the accused, ethnic diversity, dual nationality or statelessness, different languages, impassability, and so on.It is difficult to carry out such measures as returning to society and helping and educating such defendants.If the crime is committed again, it is difficult to find out whether there is a criminal record or whether it constitutes recidivism, which is not conducive to the establishment of a long-term mechanism for preventing and cracking down on crime.Second, the age of unidentified foreign minor criminal suspects is often unable to be accurately determined, leading to deviation in the final sentencing of the court; third, the foreign criminal suspects are ethnically complex and use language.Dialects vary widely, it is difficult to employ translation and the level is not uniform, which leads to the defect of the criminal suspect's confession record; fourth, the mechanism of international judicial exchange and cooperation is not perfect, the difficulty of obtaining evidence, there are doubts about whether the evidence transferred from abroad is accepted or not;Fifth, in criminal cases of infringing on citizens' personal rights, they are often unable to carry out due to the inability to verify the property of foreign defendants or the lack of formal channels of judicial assistance enforcement although they have property abroad.This paper hopes to analyze the new situation and new problems in the trial of criminal cases involving Myanmar by the court, to carry out analysis and study, and to put forward corresponding countermeasures, in order to perfect the system and properly deal with the criminal cases involving Myanmar, which will promote international exchanges.Maintaining good-neighborly and friendly cell wave friendship between China and Myanmar plays an important role in changing ideas, innovating social management, developing frontier economy, promoting social progress, and providing strong judicial guarantee for border people's harmony.
【學位授予單位】：云南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D925.2;D822.333.7

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 何允申;;怎樣認識刑事案件持續(xù)上升的趨勢[J];公安大學學報;1988年06期

2 趙進一;;無知釀成悲劇——本市外來人口刑事案件根源探[J];上海成人教育;1994年Z2期

3 郭浩善;論少年刑事案件審判中的觀念轉變[J];青少年犯罪問題;1997年04期

4 杜桂蘭;李某的行為是否構成不移交刑事案件罪[J];當代法學;1999年S1期

5 曹勇;刑事案件公開審判中的幾點注意事項[J];法律適用;1999年04期

6 ;中華全國律師協(xié)會關于律師辦理刑事案件的十項要求[J];中國律師;1999年07期

7 肖祖瀚;;報復社會嚴重刑事案件激增的四大主因[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2013年49期

8 何冰;;新加坡社會為何安定[J];人民文摘;2007年06期

9 ;信息[J];時代教育(先鋒國家歷史);2008年06期

10 李立;論刑事案件中犯罪嫌疑人、被告人死亡的處理[J];中央政法管理干部學院學報;2000年03期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 洪源;;m鏨倌晷淌擄訃⺁u查制度的v|展、形成及其方戄和基本原RG[A];少年刑事司法制度學術研討會論文集[C];2001年

2 甘雅玲;郭中偉;劉明輝;陳占河;;刑事案件中動物毛發(fā)的掃描電鏡研究[A];第三屆全國掃描電子顯微學會議論文集[C];2003年

3 饒輝華;;10年100件公眾關注刑事案件的普遍性問題探究[A];建設公平正義社會與刑事法律適用問題研究-全國法院第24屆學術討論會獲獎論文集（上冊）[C];2012年

4 呂娜娜;;論我國刑事案件二審開庭審理制度[A];當代法學論壇（2008年第1輯）[C];2008年

5 樊京京;;醉酒駕駛機動車刑事案件中血液酒精含量檢測若干問題探討[A];貴州法學（2014年第6期）[C];2014年

6 裴}，

本文編號：1736210