本文關(guān)鍵詞： 東盟政策 戰(zhàn)略 效果 中國 印度　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：歷史上，東南亞地區(qū)一直是中國保障周邊穩(wěn)定環(huán)境中最為重要的地區(qū)之一，當(dāng)前更是成為中國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和能源進(jìn)口的生命線。中國和東盟國家關(guān)系的發(fā)展，在一定程度上決定著中國崛起和中華民族復(fù)興的進(jìn)程。20世紀(jì)90年代，冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束，蘇聯(lián)解體，世界形勢發(fā)生了很大的變化。中國在“和平共處”五項(xiàng)原則、“睦鄰友好”外交方針的指導(dǎo)下，和東盟國家在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、安全、文化領(lǐng)域的交流合作迅速升溫。與此同時(shí)，印度依據(jù)國內(nèi)外形勢的發(fā)展變化，制定了面向東南亞地區(qū)的“東向政策”。進(jìn)入新世紀(jì)以來，國際格局的多極化趨勢更加明顯，東南亞國家以東盟為整體作為一支獨(dú)立的力量平衡著亞太地區(qū)的大國勢力，在東亞、東南亞事務(wù)上扮演著至關(guān)重要的角色，發(fā)揮著極其重要的作用，已經(jīng)成為亞太地區(qū)大國競相追逐的合作對象。從地緣政治的角度考慮，東盟對于中國的意義已不再是簡單的安全保障，更是中國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展、能源進(jìn)口生命線的咽喉和具有太多共同利益的戰(zhàn)略伙伴。中國、印度作為世界上最大的發(fā)展中國家和正在迅速崛起的國家，基于各自的國家利益，在東南亞地區(qū)的互動(dòng)和博弈不可避免。目前，印度的“東向政策”已經(jīng)進(jìn)入第二階段，與東盟國家在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、軍事領(lǐng)域的關(guān)系日益密切，并且還有繼續(xù)擴(kuò)大和深化的趨勢。此外，受1962年中印邊界戰(zhàn)爭以及美國全球戰(zhàn)略等其他方面因素的影響，中國、印度在東南亞地區(qū)的競爭愈發(fā)顯得復(fù)雜和激烈。 中印東盟政策比較是在全面總結(jié)兩國東盟政策的基礎(chǔ)上，找到兩國東盟政策的相同之處和不同之處。然后通過比較中印東盟政策在經(jīng)貿(mào)、軍事安全、文化交流領(lǐng)域已經(jīng)取得的效果，解析目前中國所具有的優(yōu)勢和劣勢，同時(shí)總結(jié)印度東盟政策的有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒到我國東盟政策中來。在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化、區(qū)域一體化的今天，“合則兩利、斗則兩傷”的觀念已經(jīng)深入人心，在競爭中謀合作、求發(fā)展已經(jīng)成為中印兩國眾多有識(shí)之士的共識(shí)。此外，以中印東盟政策的效果比較為依據(jù)，，進(jìn)一步預(yù)測中國、印度對東盟政策的未來走向，進(jìn)行三方良性互動(dòng)的可行性分析，提出中國、印度和東盟“三贏”的具體辦法。如此能夠幫助我國在不斷變化的機(jī)遇和挑戰(zhàn)中做出正確的判斷和選擇，從而更好地服務(wù)于國家利益，早日實(shí)現(xiàn)中國和平崛起和中華民族復(fù)興的偉大目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:Historically, Southeast Asia has been one of the most important regions in China's efforts to ensure a stable environment around it, and is now becoming the lifeline of China's economic development and energy imports. The development of relations between China and ASEAN countries, The process of China's rise and the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation to a certain extent. On 90s, the Cold War ended and the Soviet Union disintegrated. Great changes have taken place in the world situation. Under the guidance of the five principles of "peaceful coexistence" and the diplomatic policy of "good-neighborly friendship", China's exchanges and cooperation with ASEAN countries in the political, economic, security, and cultural fields have rapidly increased. At the same time, According to the development and changes of the situation at home and abroad, India has formulated a "eastward policy" for Southeast Asia. Since the beginning of the new century, the trend of multi-polarization in the international pattern has become more obvious. The Southeast Asian countries as a whole, as an independent force, balance the powers of the Asia-Pacific region, play a vital role in the affairs of East Asia and Southeast Asia, and play an extremely important role. ASEAN has become the object of cooperation pursued by major powers in the Asia-Pacific region. From a geopolitical point of view, the significance of ASEAN to China is no longer a simple security guarantee, but also China's economic development. China, India, as the world's largest developing country and a rapidly rising country, is based on its own national interests. Interaction and game play in Southeast Asia is inevitable. At present, India's "eastward policy" has entered the second phase, with increasingly close ties with ASEAN countries in the political, economic, and military fields. In addition, due to the Indian border war in middle of 1962 and other factors such as the United States' global strategy, the competition between China and India in Southeast Asia has become increasingly complex and intense. The comparison of the ASEAN policies between China and India is to find out the similarities and differences between the ASEAN policies of the two countries on the basis of a comprehensive summary of the ASEAN policies of the two countries. The results achieved in the field of cultural exchange, the analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of China at present, and the summary of the beneficial experiences of the Indo-ASEAN policy have been drawn from the ASEAN policy of China. In the context of economic globalization, In today's era of regional integration, the concept of "sharing two benefits and fighting two wounds" has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. Seeking cooperation in competition and seeking development has become the consensus of many people of insight in China and India. In addition, based on the comparison of the effect of the policy of China and India on ASEAN, To further predict the future direction of China's and India's ASEAN policies, to carry out a feasibility analysis of the positive interaction among the three parties, and to propose that China, India and ASEAN's "triple win" approach. This can help our country to make correct judgments and choices in the changing opportunities and challenges, thus better serving the national interests. To realize at an early date the great goal of China's peaceful rise and the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D822.3;D835.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 尤素夫·瓦南迪;林秋明;;中國與東盟:加強(qiáng)未來關(guān)系[J];東南亞縱橫;2009年11期

2 蔡宏波;黃建忠;;東盟對外自由貿(mào)易區(qū)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及態(tài)勢[J];東南亞縱橫;2010年04期

3 張小欣;1967—1977年印度對東盟政策淺析[J];東南亞;2002年02期

4 陳建榮;;東向政策與大國平衡:印度東盟認(rèn)知的改變[J];東南亞研究;2006年03期

5 張錫鎮(zhèn);;東盟實(shí)施大國平衡戰(zhàn)略的新進(jìn)展[J];東南亞研究;2008年03期

6 郭秋梅;周聿峨;;印度—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)淺論——基于印度的視角[J];東南亞研究;2010年06期

7 趙小碩;;試析中國國家安全中的東盟因素[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年07期

8 程永林;中國-東盟戰(zhàn)略伙伴關(guān)系與我國的地緣安全利益研究[J];廣東省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

9 趙洪;;冷戰(zhàn)后印度與東盟關(guān)系的變化及其原因[J];國際論壇;2006年02期

10 張?bào)K;張泗考;;論印度文化民族主義對印度外交的影響[J];國際論壇;2008年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳杰;冷戰(zhàn)后中國與印度之東南亞戰(zhàn)略比較[D];電子科技大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：1529488