【摘要】：浪漫主義史學(xué)與后現(xiàn)代主義史學(xué)都是對現(xiàn)代性作出的回應(yīng)�；趯臻g的關(guān)注,它們都反對現(xiàn)代主義的線性歷史觀,強調(diào)史學(xué)研究的多重視角。在歷史觀念和歷史書寫上,它們呈現(xiàn)出諸多相似性:如對特殊主義、地域主義、偶然性、奇聞軼事、多元性、開放性、差異性的強調(diào);在懷鄉(xiāng)情緒中表現(xiàn)歷史寫作的詩性和審美維度;對微觀史和日常生活史的書寫等。這表明后現(xiàn)代主義史學(xué)在某種程度上是對浪漫主義史學(xué)更高層次的回歸。
[Abstract]:Romantic historiography and postmodernism historiography are both responses to modernization. Based on the attention to space, they all oppose the modernist view of linear history and emphasize the multiple perspectives of historiography. In terms of historical concepts and historical writing, they show many similarities: such as the emphasis on specialism, regionalism, contingency, anecdotes, pluralism, openness and difference; the poetic and aesthetic dimensions of historical writing in nostalgia; and the writing of microcosmic history and daily life history. This shows that postmodernism historiography is to some extent a higher level of return to romantic historiography.
【作者單位】： 北京聯(lián)合大學(xué)人文社科部;
【分類號】：K091

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 M.�？�;王U喎，

本文編號：2502679