【摘要】：日本的學院派史學自形成之日起至今,一直堅持著實證主義研究方法,這一研究方法在今日呈現(xiàn)出諸多弊端,使得學院派史家無法承擔起"普世"與"經世致用"的職責。為了彌補這一缺陷,"民間史家"應運而生。他們在研究與著作風格上與學院派史家存在明顯差異,代替學院派史家承擔起歷史學者應盡的職責,逐漸控制了歷史知識領域的話語權,對日本民眾歷史認識與歷史觀具有極大影響力。學院派史家與民間史家均有各自的優(yōu)勢與缺陷,互相取長補短,在競爭中互相促進是日本史學發(fā)展的最佳途徑。改進的核心目標應當是勇于承擔歷史學家"求真普世""學以致用"的職責。
[Abstract]:Since its formation, Japanese academic historiography has been adhering to positivist research method, which presents many disadvantages today, which makes academic historians unable to undertake the duties of "universal world" and "practical application". In order to make up for this defect, "folk historian" came into being. They are obviously different from academic historians in their research and writing style. Instead of academic historians, they take on the duties of historians and gradually control the right to speak in the field of historical knowledge. It has great influence on the Japanese people's historical understanding and historical view. Academic historians and folk historians both have their own advantages and disadvantages, learn from each other and promote each other in the competition is the best way for the development of Japanese historiography. The core goal of improvement should be to take on the responsibility of historians to "seek truth and make use of learning".
【作者單位】： 南開大學日本研究院;
【分類號】：K093.13

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 文青;檔案、歷史源流辨[J];湘潭大學學報(社會科學版);1990年02期

相關重要報紙文章 前2條

1 王曉秋 北京大學歷史學系教授;歷史豈能任意顛覆[N];人民日報;2014年

2 宋京整理;最新美國歷史研究動向[N];社會科學報;2002年

，

本文編號：2341597