本文選題：晚清 + 新學書目�。� 參考：《齊魯學刊》2014年04期

【摘要】：晚清出現(xiàn)了一股編纂新學書目的高潮。它們通過提要、類序、自注等多種形式,評論晚清新學歷史書籍,體現(xiàn)出濃厚的民族本位史學意識。這表現(xiàn)在三個方面:在批判世界史編纂的語境中爭取中國史家的話語權(quán);在對外國(主要是日本)學者所撰寫的中國史的批駁中進行國民愛國主義教育;著錄、評論中國史家的新學歷史撰述,反映出晚清史學的自我期許與學術(shù)自信。晚清學者身處內(nèi)憂外患之中,在所撰寫的新學書目中,通過對興亡史和變法史的評論寄予了保國、強國的政治訴求。
[Abstract]:A climax of compiling a new bibliography appeared in the late Qing Dynasty. They comment on the new history books of late Qing Dynasty in many forms, such as abstract, class preface, self-note and so on, which embodies a strong consciousness of ethnic-standard historiography. This is manifested in three aspects: striving for the voice of Chinese historians in the context of critique of the compilation of world history; conducting national patriotism education in the criticism of Chinese history written by foreign scholars (mainly Japanese); The commentary on the history of Chinese historians reflects the self-expectation and academic self-confidence of historiography in the late Qing Dynasty. The scholars in the late Qing Dynasty were in the midst of internal and external troubles. In their new bibliography, they placed their political demands on Baoguo and the powerful nation through the comments on the history of rise and fall and the history of reform.
【作者單位】： 四川師范大學歷史文化學院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學研究青年基金項目“晚清史學批評的演進路徑與成就(1840—1911)”(12YJC770038)
【分類號】：K092
，

本文編號：1777413