【摘要】：改革開放的深入引起了我國一系列的深刻變革。在經(jīng)濟體制轉(zhuǎn)軌、單位制消解的情況下,房屋私有、社區(qū)自治日益成為主流。于是一個基于房屋產(chǎn)權(quán)的新興社區(qū)自組織——業(yè)主委員會成為研究和關(guān)注的焦點。由于業(yè)主委員會先天與公民社會的耦合性,很多學者對它在促進中國公民社會建設中的作用寄予厚望。盡管經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和國家相繼出臺的相關(guān)法律法規(guī)為業(yè)主委員會的發(fā)展創(chuàng)造了有利條件,但是在實際運作中,業(yè)主委員會卻遇到諸多困難。 本文選取哈爾濱市具有典型代表性的三個社區(qū)為個案,以“過程-事件分析”的視角,通過業(yè)主委員會所經(jīng)歷的成立、換屆以及維權(quán)等等動態(tài)的事件過程,采用“國家-市場-社會”為分析框架,分析業(yè)主委員會在籌備成立以及運行過程中所遇到的阻礙及其深層原因。 社區(qū)是社會發(fā)育和生長的根基,社區(qū)中國家、市場與社會的關(guān)系可以折射出在整個大社會背景中,三者錯綜復雜的關(guān)系。本文試圖厘清以居委會和街道辦事處為代表的國家、以開發(fā)商和物業(yè)服務公司為代表的市場和以業(yè)主和業(yè)委會為代表的社會在社區(qū)這個濃縮的社會中的互動和博弈。 本文通過對三個社區(qū)業(yè)主、業(yè)主委員會、居委會、物業(yè)服務公司等的深入訪談和對事件的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)居委會及街道辦事處、開發(fā)商及物業(yè)服務公司和業(yè)主的態(tài)度是業(yè)主委員會能否成立的關(guān)鍵因素,其中代表國家的居委會的態(tài)度有至關(guān)重要。而在業(yè)主委員會的運作過程中,面對街道辦事處和居委會的上下級關(guān)系、開發(fā)商與物業(yè)公司的“父子”關(guān)系,業(yè)主與業(yè)委會間的關(guān)系卻表現(xiàn)出了分離和聚合的兩種不同形態(tài)。這兩種形態(tài)對于公民社會的作用大不相同。在強大國家對社會的控制以及發(fā)育不完善的市場對社會的制約的雙重壓迫下,弱小的社會看似已不堪重負。但是公民社會的種子卻在國家和市場的鼻息下,已漸漸萌發(fā)。
[Abstract]:The deepening of reform and opening up has caused a series of profound changes in our country. In the economic system transition, the unit system to eliminate the situation, private housing, community autonomy has increasingly become the mainstream. Therefore, a new community self-organization based on housing property-owners' committee has become the focus of research and attention. Due to the coupling between owners' committee and civil society, many scholars place great hopes on its role in promoting the construction of Chinese civil society. Although the economic development and the related laws and regulations have created favorable conditions for the development of the owners' committee, the owners' committee has encountered many difficulties in practical operation. In this paper, three typical communities in Harbin are selected as case studies. From the perspective of "process-event analysis", the dynamic event process, such as the establishment of the owners' committee, the transformation of the owners' committee and the protection of rights, is adopted. In this paper, the author analyzes the obstacles encountered in the preparation and operation of the owners' committee and its underlying causes by using the framework of "state-market society" as an analytical framework. Community is the foundation of social development and growth. The relationship between state, market and society in the community can reflect the complicated relationship among the three in the whole social background. This paper attempts to clarify the interaction and game between the community and the community represented by the neighborhood committee and the neighborhood office, the market represented by the developer and the property service company, and the society represented by the owner and industry committee. Through the in-depth interviews and analysis of the three community owners, owners' committees, neighborhood committees, property service companies, etc., we find that the neighborhood committees and street offices, The attitude of developers and property service companies and owners is the key factor to establish the owners' committee. In the operation process of the owners' committee, facing the relationship between the street office and the neighborhood committee, and the relationship between the developer and the property company, the relationship between the owner and the industrial committee shows two different forms of separation and aggregation. The role of these two forms of civil society is very different. Under the double oppression of the strong country to control the society and the imperfect market to restrict the society, the weak society seems to be overwhelmed. But the seeds of civil society have sprouted under the nose of the state and the market.
【學位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：C912.8;F293.33

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙凝;;社區(qū)志愿行動:后單位制時代中國社區(qū)建設的一種重要力量[J];北京青年政治學院學報;2009年01期

2 沈毅;;社區(qū)建設的組織化困境[J];城市問題;2009年11期

3 肖艷;社區(qū)居委會定位再探[J];福建教育學院學報;2003年10期

4 費梅蘋;業(yè)主委員會與中國的市民社會[J];華東理工大學學報(社會科學版);2001年02期

5 尹海潔;趙麗;;城市社區(qū)居委會的功能偏差分析[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2006年02期

6 郭麗麗;;社區(qū)自治:我國市民社會構(gòu)建的現(xiàn)實平臺[J];南京航空航天大學學報(社會科學版);2008年04期

7 劉軼君;;國家和專業(yè)性社團關(guān)系研究文獻綜述——從法團主義角度[J];湖北行政學院學報;2008年S1期

8 孟偉;建構(gòu)公民政治:業(yè)主集體行動策略及其邏輯——以深圳市寶安區(qū)瀅水山莊業(yè)主維權(quán)行動為例[J];華中師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2005年03期

9 李小博;;試論業(yè)主大會成立難的原因及對策[J];遼寧行政學院學報;2010年09期

10 劉安;;社區(qū)業(yè)主委員會的發(fā)展與城市社區(qū)自治[J];南京社會科學;2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 蘇媛;住宅小區(qū)業(yè)主委員會參與社區(qū)治理的困境研究[D];中南大學;2010年

，

本文編號：2400935