本文選題：卡西爾 + 符號�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文從符號是人與動物的根本區(qū)別出發(fā),闡發(fā)了卡西爾的符號人學(xué),旨在說明科學(xué)的符號不是唯一的符號,除了科學(xué)符號以外,還有直接的、情感的、道德的等諸多符號形式；這些符號形式承載了神話的、宗教的、語言的、藝術(shù)的、歷史的內(nèi)容。人類利用自己的符號和符號形式構(gòu)造實(shí)在,從而形成了人類特有的文化世界。反過來,人類的文化世界是符號世界,符號的世界是人文科學(xué)世界和自然科學(xué)世界的統(tǒng)一。 文章共有三章。第一章首先是對卡西爾關(guān)于人文科學(xué)邏輯的探討,分三節(jié)。第一節(jié)說明符號是人文科學(xué)的研究對象。第二節(jié)闡述了符號的三個層次,一個人文科學(xué)概念包括物理存在的、對象表現(xiàn)的和位格表達(dá)的三個層次,其中位格表達(dá)是人文科學(xué)邏輯的突出體現(xiàn)。第三節(jié)說明形式原則和因果原則對人文科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)同樣有效。 既然卡西爾認(rèn)為符號是人文科學(xué)研究的對象,那么符號又具有什么樣的特性呢?第二章就探討了符號的整體性、功能性、豐富性及其研究方法三個特點(diǎn)。在符號形式哲學(xué)中,整體性就表現(xiàn)為符號和符號形式體系不是各種符號和符號形式的簡單相加,而是這個體系大于或優(yōu)于這些要素之和。符號形式的哲學(xué)雖然對這些體系分開論述,但它們是統(tǒng)一的,是功能性的統(tǒng)一。各個符號和符號形式之間相互關(guān)聯(lián),共同置于這些體系之中。豐富性與整體性密切相關(guān),表現(xiàn)為符號構(gòu)造對象的靈活性,正是如此,人文科學(xué)既采取現(xiàn)象學(xué)的分析,又對符號進(jìn)行解釋和再解釋。這三個特點(diǎn)相互交融共同構(gòu)成了符號的特性。 符號構(gòu)成的符號世界正是人與動物的顯著標(biāo)志,第三章就全面揭示了人的本性。首先卡西爾對傳統(tǒng)人學(xué)理論作了梳理,在此基礎(chǔ)上,提出了人是符號的動物,一方面符號顯示了人的本性,另一方面人類利用它們構(gòu)造了人類文化。因此,世界是人的符號和符號的人的世界。符號是卡西爾思想的支點(diǎn),也是貫穿本文的觀點(diǎn)連續(xù)性的關(guān)鍵詞；符號和符號形式的豐富性組成了既包括自然科學(xué),也包括人文科學(xué)的符號世界。
[Abstract]:Starting from the fundamental difference between human beings and animals, this paper expounds Cassier's semiotic anthropology, which aims at explaining that scientific symbols are not the only symbols. Besides scientific symbols, there are many symbolic forms, such as direct, emotional, moral and so on. These symbolic forms carry mythical, religious, linguistic, artistic, historical content. Human beings use their own symbols and symbolic forms to construct reality, thus forming a unique cultural world. In turn, the world of human culture is the world of symbols, and the world of symbols is the unity of the world of humanities and the world of natural sciences. The article has three chapters. The first chapter is about Cassier's discussion on the logic of humanities, which is divided into three sections. The first section explains that the symbol is the object of the humanities research. The second section expounds the three levels of symbol, a concept of human science including physical existence, object representation and representation of the three levels, in which the expression of the case is the outstanding embodiment of the logic of the humanities. Section III explains that the principles of form and causation are equally valid for the humanities and the natural sciences. Since Cassirer thinks that the symbol is the object of the humanities research, then what kind of characteristic does the symbol have? The second chapter discusses the integrity, functionality, richness and research methods of symbols. In the philosophy of symbolic form, the wholeness is not the simple addition of various symbols and symbolic forms, but the fact that the system is greater than or superior to the sum of these elements. Although the philosophy of symbolic form discusses these systems separately, they are unified and functional. Symbols and forms of symbols are interlinked and placed together in these systems. Richness and integrity are closely related to the flexibility of the object of symbolic construction. It is precisely so that the humanities not only adopt phenomenological analysis but also interpret and reinterpret the symbols. These three characteristics blend with each other and form the characteristics of symbols. The symbolic world formed by symbols is a remarkable symbol of man and animals. Chapter three reveals the nature of human beings. On the basis of this, Cassier proposed that man is an animal of symbols. On the one hand, symbols show human nature, on the other hand, human beings use them to construct human culture. Therefore, the world is the human symbol and symbol of the human world. The symbol is the fulcrum of Cassier's thought and the key word of the continuity of the viewpoint in this paper. The richness of the symbol and the form of the symbol make up the symbolic world which includes both the natural science and the humanities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：C912

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 李恩來;論卡西爾的人文科學(xué)觀[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

2 石福祁;;略論卡西爾“符號”概念的自然科學(xué)來源[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2009年05期

3 石福祁;;《人論》與卡西爾人類學(xué)的進(jìn)展[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

4 石福祁;;淺析卡西爾與格式塔心理學(xué)的關(guān)系[J];社科縱橫;2009年03期

5 何萍;;論卡西爾的符號形式哲學(xué)[J];學(xué)海;2010年04期

6 何萍;何謂人學(xué)[J];哲學(xué)動態(tài);2000年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 蘭州大學(xué)哲學(xué)社會學(xué)院 石福祈;[N];光明日報;2010年

，

本文編號：1851632