本文關鍵詞： 思想史 形態(tài) 內(nèi)容 體例 方法 思想史觀　出處：《浙江社會科學》2010年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：由于研究對象的無形與復雜,思想史的界定很困難。雖然思想史的研究應該是一個開放的領域,但具體的研究卻有待于來自學術(shù)史的規(guī)定�！睹魅鍖W案》與《宋元學案》是中國思想史研究中的奠基性著作,本文以這兩部學案為例,就思想史的形態(tài)與內(nèi)容、體例與方法,以及知識與價值訴求下的不同的思想史觀進行了分析。
[Abstract]:Because of the intangibility and complexity of the object of study, it is very difficult to define the history of thought. Although the study of the history of thought should be an open field, However, the specific research has yet to come from the provisions of academic history. "the case of Confucianism in Ming Dynasty" and "the case of Learning in Song and Yuan dynasties" are the foundational works in the study of the history of Chinese ideology. This paper takes these two cases as an example to discuss the form and content, style and method of the history of thought. As well as the knowledge and the value demand under the different thought historical view carries on the analysis.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學宋學研究中心;復旦大學文史研究院;
【分類號】：C092
，

本文編號：1516109