論《神圣家族》的人道主義思想
[Abstract]:The full name of the Holy Family is the Holy Family, or the critique of criticism. "refuting Bruno Powell and his Partners." it is the first work of the cooperation of young Marx and Engels. It criticizes speculative idealism from many angles and contains humanitarianism in the way of argumentation. The title of this paper is "on humanitarianism in the Holy Family", in which "Holy Family" is a key point and humanitarianism is another key point. One of the core problems to be solved in this paper is to start with the criticism of the Holy Family in three aspects: philosophy, economy and society, and according to Marx and Engels' thoughts before the first cooperation. The humanitarianism thought in the Holy Family is drawn, and the uniqueness of the humanitarianism thought in the Holy Family is sought. In addition, I combine the humanitarianism thought in the Holy Family with the present reality, think about its inheritance and transcendence to the past humanitarian thought, and talk about its enlightening significance to the reality. In the first chapter, the author will explain the basis, research problems and methods, literature review and significance of the topic. The most important thing is to sum up one's own views on humanitarianism and make preliminary preparations for the interpretation of humanitarianism in the Holy Family. In the second chapter, the author will sort out the thoughts of Marx and Engels before the Holy Family is written in order to better understand the text. In the third chapter, the author interprets the humanitarianism thought in the Holy Family from three angles. The first section is interpreted from the angle of philosophical criticism, which includes three aspects: the critique of speculative idealism, the critique of idealist view of history and the philosophical criticism combined with the book "Secrets of Paris"; The second section, from the angle of economic criticism, includes two aspects: the analysis of the word "alienation" and the comments on the political economy of Buluton, and the third section, which includes two aspects from the angle of social criticism. It was a statement of socialism and a succession to Feuerbach. In the fourth chapter, the author summarizes the characteristics and enlightenment of humanitarianism in the Holy Family.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:A811
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 葉先闖;;論《神圣家族》中的歷史唯物主義思想[J];科教文匯(下旬刊);2009年06期
2 付文軍;;建國以來《神圣家族》研究綜述[J];傳承;2011年17期
3 孫述娟;翟曉青;;淺析馬克思恩格斯《神圣家族》的內(nèi)容及其作用意義[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2012年S6期
4 崔緒治;;友誼的結(jié)晶 事業(yè)的開端——讀馬克思、恩格斯的《神圣家族》[J];江蘇師院學(xué)報;1981年01期
5 王長里;《神圣家族》和歷史唯物主義的形成[J];江西社會科學(xué);1983年05期
6 鄭又成;向生產(chǎn)關(guān)系概念的接近──《神圣家族》學(xué)習(xí)札記[J];武陵學(xué)刊;1996年05期
7 趙民;要有“使用實踐力量的人”——《神圣家族》的特殊貢獻[J];社科縱橫;1998年04期
8 李銳;;《關(guān)于費爾巴哈的提綱》與《神圣家族》的關(guān)系再探析[J];世紀橋;2010年03期
9 趙民;岳海云;;要有“使用實踐力量的人”——《神圣家族》對馬克思主義哲學(xué)史的特殊貢獻[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2010年01期
10 戴生岐;;《神圣家族》的人本性意蘊和社會主義價值訴求[J];寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 聶錦芳;如何解讀《關(guān)于費爾巴哈的提綱》[N];光明日報;2005年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 段鈞元;論《神圣家族》的人道主義思想[D];山東大學(xué);2017年
2 鐘錫進;《神圣家族》的倫理思想探析[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年
3 林琳;論馬克思《神圣家族》一書對近代形而上學(xué)的批判[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2008年
4 朱凱;人的現(xiàn)實自由之路[D];中共四川省委黨校;2012年
5 孫祺;批判工作的歷史性推進[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號:2162918
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2162918.html