本文選題：《資本論》　切入點：輝格史觀　出處：《哲學基礎理論研究》2015年01期

【摘要】：巴特菲爾德所揭示的"輝格史觀"針對的是以"當下"作為"過去"的判斷標準,忽視了歷史的多樣性與具體性的歷史研究范式;《資本論》闡釋中的輝格史觀,則是將馬克思在《資本論》中所構造的"特殊對象的特殊邏輯"視為"一般對象的一般邏輯",進而將"思想的具體"視為"現(xiàn)實的具體",因此導致了一系列的誤讀。"輝格史觀"的無奈在于同時兼顧"歷史的具體"與"歷史的總體"、"過去"與"現(xiàn)在"的兩難。要建構起切合當代中國現(xiàn)實的理論圖景,就必須走出《資本論》闡釋中的輝格史觀。
[Abstract]:Butterfield's "Whig's view of history" aims at "the present" as the criterion of "past", neglecting the historical research paradigm of diversity and concreteness of history, and the historical view of Whig in the interpretation of Capital.The "special logic of special object" constructed by Marx in Capital is regarded as "general logic of general object", and "concrete of thought" is regarded as "concrete of reality", which leads to a series of misreading. "The helplessness of Whig's view of history lies in the dilemma of "concrete history" and "historical collectivity", "past" and "present" at the same time.In order to construct a theoretical picture in line with the reality of contemporary China, we must go out of the historical view of Whig in the interpretation of Capital.
【作者單位】： 南開大學哲學院;
【分類號】：A811
，

本文編號：1686683