本文選題：阿根廷危機 + 國際關(guān)系�。� 參考：《復旦大學》2004年博士論文

【摘要】：阿根廷在20世紀90年代取得了令大多數(shù)發(fā)展中國家羨慕的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展,同時也被西方發(fā)達國家視為實施新自由主義改革取得成功的“榜樣”。但從2001年年末一直蔓延到2002年,阿根廷國內(nèi)陷入了一場全面的經(jīng)濟、政治和社會危機。目前大多數(shù)對這次危機進行分析的已有成果基本上都是從經(jīng)濟的角度或是強調(diào)阿根廷國內(nèi)政策失誤,即使談到外部因素,大多也是指責國際貨幣基金組織(IMF)在指導和援助方面犯了錯誤。本文認為:阿根廷危機是國內(nèi)和國際兩方面因素共同作用的結(jié)果,就阿根廷十年來所推行的新自由主義政策而言,國際因素的作用更為明顯。 第一章是說明本文進行分析的理論框架。包含兩方面內(nèi)容,一是通過介紹近半個世紀關(guān)于國際體系結(jié)構(gòu)與發(fā)展中國家發(fā)展模式的理論發(fā)展,說明阿根廷這些年來在國家發(fā)展模式上的變化。二是通過介紹古勒維奇關(guān)于國際關(guān)系中“顛倒的第二種意象”的理論及其發(fā)展,說明阿根廷危機正是這種國際因素構(gòu)成國內(nèi)危機原因的例證。 第二章是對阿根廷危機的回顧。在這一章中,首先對被很多人認為是這次危機“罪魁禍首”的貨幣局體制進行全面評價。本文認為,相比于其國內(nèi)的其他政治、經(jīng)濟和社會政策,將危機歸咎于貨幣局體制是不負責任的。導致阿根廷危機的國內(nèi)因素包括:與貨幣局體制不相適應的大規(guī)模舉債發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略、不負責任的財政政策以及全盤接受新自由主義發(fā)展模式而沒有注意這種模式與阿根廷國內(nèi)社會狀況不相適應所造成的嚴重后果等方面, 結(jié)果,阿根廷雖然在90年代取得了快速的經(jīng)濟增長,但同時也為危機的爆發(fā)埋下了伏筆。 第三章是從國際經(jīng)濟的角度進行分析。首先是國際金融體系與金融全球化的影響,阿根廷的全面金融自由化使國家完全喪失了對其國內(nèi)金融體系的控制。其次,阿根廷在利用外資的政策上也有失誤,一方面,其外資的構(gòu)成中直接投資比例過小,另一方面,在使用外債問題上犯了不少錯誤。再次,在貿(mào)易自由化的過程中,未能相應地解決好產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整問題,而是在傳統(tǒng)的比較優(yōu)勢理論指導下,走上了非工業(yè)化道路,加深了對發(fā)達國家的技術(shù)依附。最后一點是分析新自由主義在這次危機中扮演的角色。 第四章是闡述國際政治的變化對阿根廷危機的作用。一方面強調(diào)了近20年來非國家行為體的興起對傳統(tǒng)國家主權(quán)職能的侵蝕作用,如IMF以及跨國公司這些非國家行為體在這次危機中扮演了非同尋常的作用。另一方面則主要是分析這十年中美國政策的變化對阿根廷危機的影響。 最后一章是總結(jié)這次危機的經(jīng)驗教訓。在經(jīng)濟全球化的背景下,發(fā)達國家 WP=5 向廣大發(fā)展中國家大力輸出新自由主義的發(fā)展模式是從其自身利益出發(fā)的。在各國相互依賴不斷增強的同時,發(fā)展中國家應該認識到,這種相互依賴是不對稱的,強大的國際性因素可能會對本國國內(nèi)發(fā)展帶來嚴重的消極影響。在面臨國際性因素對國內(nèi)發(fā)展的影響時,必須處理好國家(政府)與市場以及國際與國內(nèi)兩方面的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Argentina has kept enviable economic growth for many developing countries in 1990s, but also by the western developed countries as the implementation of the new liberalism reform successful model. But from the end of 2001 has been spread to Argentina in 2002, into a comprehensive economic, political and social crisis. Most of the existing crisis the analysis results are basically from the economic point of view is that Argentina or domestic policy mistakes, even on external factors, most criticized the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has made a mistake in the guidance and assistance. This paper argues that the crisis in Argentina is the interaction of the two factors of domestic and international results, the implementation of Argentina ten years of the new liberalism policy, international factors are more obvious.
The first chapter is the analysis of the theoretical framework includes two aspects, one is through the introduction of the theory about the development of the international system and development pattern of developing countries for nearly half a century, Argentina changes in the pattern of national development on these years. The two is through the introduction of Guler Vecchi's Theory of international relations "the second image reversed" and the development of Argentina crisis is the domestic crisis caused by international factors example.
The second chapter is a review of the Argentina crisis. In this chapter, firstly, is considered by many people to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the crisis "arch-criminal" of the currency board system. This paper argues that, compared with other domestic political, economic and social policies, blamed the crisis on the currency board system is irresponsible. Lead national factors including the crisis in Argentina: the strategy of development on large-scale debt does not adapt to the currency board system, irresponsible fiscal policy and accept the new liberalism development mode and did not pay attention to this pattern and Argentina domestic social situation does not adapt to the serious consequences, results, although Argentina achieved in 90s. Rapid economic growth, but also for the outbreak of the crisis foreshadowed.
The third chapter is the analysis from the perspective of international economy. The first is the impact of the international financial system and financial globalization, Argentina financial liberalization makes the country completely lost control of the domestic financial system. Secondly, Argentina has made mistakes, in the use of foreign capital policy on the one hand, the foreign direct investment in the form the proportion is too small, on the other hand, many mistakes in the use of foreign debt problems. Thirdly, in the process of trade liberalization, fail to solve the problem of industrial structural adjustment, but in the traditional theory of comparative advantage under the guidance, the way of deindustrialization and deepen technical dependence on developed countries the last point is the analysis of the new liberalism played in this crisis.
The fourth chapter is the role change described international political crisis in Argentina. It is emphasized that in recent 20 years, the rise of non-state actors in undermined traditional sovereignty on the one hand, these multinational companies such as IMF and unstate played an extraordinary role in the crisis. On the other hand is mainly analysis the influence of American policy in the ten years of the crisis in Argentina.
The last chapter is a summary of the experience and lessons of the crisis. In the context of economic globalization, developed countries
WP=5
The development mode of developing countries to the output of the new liberalism is from its own interests. Strengthening interdependence in various countries at the same time, developing countries should be aware of this interdependence is asymmetric and powerful international factors will bring serious negative impact on domestic development. Facing the impact of international factors on the domestic development, must deal with the state (government) and the relationship between the market and the international and domestic two aspects.

【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2004
【分類號】：D778.3

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 朱剛強;埃斯庫德的外圍現(xiàn)實主義研究[D];中國社會科學院研究生院;2010年

，

本文編號：1760766