本文選題：國際倫理 + 人權　； 參考：《湘潭大學學報(哲學社會科學版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：人權為國際倫理確立價值基準。人權價值和人權理念使國際倫理的規(guī)范性角色得到日益強化的認可,使個體成為國際倫理的道德主體并獲得獨立的國際人格,國際倫理因人權倫理的普遍性而被賦予正當性內涵。作為人權價值及其普遍性體現(xiàn)之一的人權國際化,面臨不干預原則與人權原則之間的張力、國際倫理認知差異導致的人權倫理沖突以及道德合法性與政治有效性之間的非對稱性等倫理挑戰(zhàn)。對于上述問題,世界主義人權倫理不認同對國際社會的"黑格爾倫理"認知,強調其"康德倫理"判斷,論證作為無差別的存在者的個體不應該面對差別化的道德地位和人權境遇,訴求每位個體擁有復合式的公民身份和完整的人權保護機制。
[Abstract]:Human rights establish the standard of value for international ethics. The value of human rights and the concept of human rights make the normative role of international ethics increasingly recognized, and the individual becomes the moral subject of international ethics and gains an independent international personality. International ethics is endowed with legitimate connotation because of the universality of human rights ethics. As one of the values of human rights and its universality, the internationalization of human rights faces the tension between the principle of non-intervention and the principle of human rights, The conflicts of human rights ethics caused by the differences in international ethical cognition and the asymmetry between moral legitimacy and political validity are ethical challenges. On the above issues, cosmopolitan human rights ethics does not agree with the "Hegel ethics" cognition of the international community, and emphasizes its "Kant ethics" judgment. The author argues that the individual who is an indistinguishable being should not face the different moral status and the human rights situation, and demands that each individual has a composite citizenship and a complete human rights protection mechanism.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學院哲學研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學研究青年基金項目“世界主義國際倫理批判”(編號:14YJC720031) 中國博士后科學基金第8批特別資助項目“世界主義思想的當代形態(tài)研究”(編號:2015T80198);中國博士后科學基金第55批面上資助項目“世界主義國際倫理研究”(編號:2014M550981)
【分類號】：B82-051;D815.7

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 何永祺;當前商業(yè)職業(yè)道德存在的主要問題及對策[J];商業(yè)經濟文薈;1997年03期

，

本文編號：1957787