本文選題：附帶 + 附帶使用�。� 參考：《西南政法大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 當今社會,極具特色的高檔寫字樓,體現獨特人文氣息的大型雕塑雕刻組合,經典的商家廣告,公路上疾馳而過的新概念跑車等等無處不在。人們在驚訝其奢華時,往往忽視了它也是享有版權的作品。這些版權作品把我們的生活團團包圍住,如果某天我們用鏡頭或者其他設備來表達個人的某種感受,只要新創(chuàng)作品中涵蓋此類物件,就有可能被控侵犯他人權利。我們表達生活感想的愿望或者進一步創(chuàng)作作品的愿望因此而被窒息或者舉步維艱。隨著科技的發(fā)展,作品的使用方式推陳出新,已經超越了當前我國相關法律的調整范圍。這一現象引起了國內外學者的廣泛關注。目前,為解決該問題許多國家都正在推動附帶使用制度的國內立法,有的國家的相關立法已經很完善了,但是我國著作權法中關于作品的附帶使用方面還處于一片空白狀態(tài)。本文通過案件引入附帶使用制度,在分析了附帶使用制度的現實需求和合理性以及在借鑒其他國家的立法經驗的基礎上,結合我國著作權作品使用方式調整的立法狀況和司法實踐,提出了我國作品附帶使用的立法,希望借此能夠引起立法者和法律專家、學者對該方面的重視,盡快在我國著作權法中構建作品附帶使用制度,使作品的創(chuàng)作得以如泉水噴涌,經濟得以健康發(fā)展。 本文除引言和結語外,共分為五部分。 第一部分介紹了我國首例涉及作品附帶使用的案件——《命運的承諾》,包括了基本案情、案件焦點、爭議與分歧意見、引發(fā)的思考五部分。通過對案件的分析指出了該案判決的不合理之處,希望引起法律人的思考,并且引出了“附帶使用”一詞。 第二部分通過對“附帶使用”一詞的含義和性質進行解析,進而介紹版權法中的“附帶使用制度”在全球的發(fā)展歷史和西方主要國家版權法中的“附帶使用制度”在司法實踐中的適用狀況,讓讀者比較清楚的理解附帶使用制度的來龍去脈。再通過把“附帶使用”與“暫時復制”和“合理使用制度”做比較,讓讀者對之有更深刻的認識。 第三部分分析了附帶使用制度的現實需求和附帶使用制度的合理性。通過分析社會生活中附帶使用行為的現狀和目前案件審理中的尷尬現狀,指出了我國在著作權法中確立附帶使用制度的必要性。任何一種制度的存在都有其理論依據。通過附帶使用制度的哲學分析和經濟學分析證明了在我國著作權法中構建附帶使用制度的合理性和必要性。 第四部分通過對全球各國版權法或者著作權法中附帶使用制度之立法例的介紹、對比、分析和總結,大體勾勒出了附帶使用制度的內容,然后具體的分析其構成要件,即構成附帶使用的作品類型,主觀要件以及客觀要件。附帶使用制度的構成要件分析比較清楚的解決了附帶使用是否成立的問題。 第五部分通過上述理論基礎和司法實踐的分析,對構建我國著作權法中的附帶使用制度提出了自己的建議。
[Abstract]:In today's society, the highly featured high grade office buildings, the large sculptures and carvings that embody the unique humanistic atmosphere, the classic commercial advertisements, the fast new concept sports cars on the road, and so on. People often ignore that it is also a copyrighted work when they are extravagant. These copyrighted works encircled our life. If one day we use a lens or other equipment to express a personal feeling, as long as a new creation covers such objects, it is possible to be accused of violating the rights of others. It has transcended the current adjustment of relevant laws in China. This phenomenon has aroused wide attention of scholars both at home and abroad. At present, in order to solve the problem, many countries are promoting the domestic legislation of the incidental use system, and the relevant legislation in some countries has been perfected, but the copyright law of our country is about to do it. The incidental use of the product is still in a blank state. This article introduces the system of incidental use through the case, analyzes the realistic demand and rationality of the incidental use system, and on the basis of reference to the legislative experience of other countries, and combines the legislative situation and judicial practice of the use mode of our copyright works, and puts forward our country. The legislation that is used incidental to the work is hoped to cause the legislator and the legal expert, the scholar to pay attention to this aspect, to construct the work incidental system in the copyright law of our country as soon as possible, so that the creation of the works can be spewed up like the spring water, and the economy can develop healthily.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts.
The first part introduces the first case involving the incidental use of the works in our country, the promise of fate, which includes five parts of the basic case, the focus of the case, the dispute and the disagreement, and the thought of the case, and points out the unreasonable of the case by the analysis of the case, and hopes to lead to the thinking of the legal person, and leads to the "incidental use". "A word.
The second part analyzes the meaning and nature of the word "incidental use", and then introduces the application of the "incidental use system" in the global development history and the "incidental use system" in the copyright law of the western major countries in the copyright law, so that the reader can understand the incidental use system more clearly. By comparing the "collateral use" with "temporary duplication" and "fair use system", readers can have a deeper understanding of the dragon.
The third part analyzes the actual demand of the incidental use system and the rationality of the incidental use system. Through the analysis of the present situation of the incidental use behavior in the social life and the embarrassing situation in the case trial, it points out the necessity of establishing the incidental use system in the copyright law of our country. According to the philosophical analysis and economic analysis of the collateral use system, it is proved that it is reasonable and necessary to construct the collateral use system in our copyright law.
The fourth part, through the introduction, comparison, analysis and summary of the legislation of the incidental use of copyright law or copyright law in the world, outlines the contents of the incidental use system, and then analyzes its constituent elements concretely, that is, the types of works that are used in incidental use, the subjective elements and the objective elements. The analysis of constitutive requirements clears up the question of whether the collateral usage is valid.
The fifth part, through the analysis of the above theoretical basis and judicial practice, puts forward some suggestions for the construction of the collateral use system in China's copyright law.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 韋之;試論著作權法中的合理使用[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);1991年03期

2 孫國華，，黃金華;論法律上的利益選擇[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;1995年04期

3 朱理;附帶使用——著作權合理使用的一種特殊形式[J];電子知識產權;2005年04期

4 黃匯;;版權“隱喻”與公共領域的式微[J];電子知識產權;2009年07期

5 吳漢東;關于中國著作權法觀念的歷史思考[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1995年03期

本文編號：1898120