本文關(guān)鍵詞： 非法作品 權(quán)利范圍 程序違法性作品 內(nèi)容違法性作品 侵權(quán)救濟(jì)　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：從中美知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)端開始,非法作品的保護(hù)問(wèn)題逐漸引起知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)界的關(guān)注,2010年2月26日對(duì)《著作權(quán)法》第四條第一款進(jìn)行了修改,非法作品更是成為學(xué)界的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。本文主要是對(duì)非法作品的分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、其權(quán)利范圍和非法作品受到侵權(quán)時(shí)如何進(jìn)行救濟(jì),加以研究和探討,以期對(duì)司法實(shí)踐提供一些切實(shí)可行的建議。 導(dǎo)言部分,筆者認(rèn)為非法作品應(yīng)該分為兩種類型,即程序違法性作品和內(nèi)容違法性作品。同時(shí)本文指出,這兩類非法作品的分類依據(jù)主要是根據(jù)司法實(shí)踐和現(xiàn)行《著作權(quán)法》第四條的規(guī)定,而對(duì)非法作品進(jìn)行的分類。并且本文指出這兩種非法作品中存在著諸如作品分類不明確、權(quán)利范圍不清晰以及侵權(quán)救濟(jì)不確定等等方面的問(wèn)題。 第一章為“非法作品的類型及其分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”。依據(jù)司法實(shí)踐中的典型例子和現(xiàn)行《著作權(quán)法》第四條,可以將非法作品分為程序違法性作品以及內(nèi)容違法性作品兩種類型。對(duì)于程序違法性作品而言,它們的相同之處是在出版、傳播該類作品的過(guò)程中違反了國(guó)家的出版監(jiān)管法規(guī)的有關(guān)規(guī)定。而對(duì)于內(nèi)容違法性作品,它們又可以進(jìn)一步細(xì)分。 第二章為“對(duì)非法作品的權(quán)利范圍的界定”。程序違法性作品的著作權(quán)人不但享有消極的專有權(quán)利而且享有今后通過(guò)合法方式利用、傳播作品的自由。因?yàn)樵擃愖髌吩诔霭婧蛡鞑サ倪^(guò)程中,僅僅是違反了國(guó)家的出版監(jiān)管法規(guī),而出版監(jiān)管法規(guī)并不能否定著作權(quán)人享有的消極的專有權(quán)利以及利用、傳播作品的自由。而對(duì)于內(nèi)容違法性作品的著作權(quán)人而言,他們僅僅享有消極的專有權(quán)利,而不能享有利用、傳播作品的自由。 第三章為“對(duì)非法作品的侵權(quán)救濟(jì)”。法院在進(jìn)行司法審判之前,必須對(duì)涉案作品進(jìn)行審查,審查其作品的內(nèi)容是否違反憲法和法律、損害公共利益,對(duì)涉案作品進(jìn)行內(nèi)容審查是司法審判過(guò)程中的一個(gè)前置性條件,一個(gè)必不可少的關(guān)鍵性環(huán)節(jié)。對(duì)于程序違法性作品而言,當(dāng)其受到侵權(quán)損害時(shí),其著作權(quán)人不僅可以請(qǐng)求侵權(quán)人停止侵權(quán),而且可以請(qǐng)求侵權(quán)人要求獲得賠償損失。對(duì)在我國(guó)傳播的未經(jīng)批準(zhǔn)的涉外影視作品進(jìn)行司法審判時(shí),首先要進(jìn)行內(nèi)容審查,審查其內(nèi)容中是否含有違反憲法和法律、損害公共利益的成分。而對(duì)于違反憲法和法律、損害公共利益的作品而言,其著作權(quán)人雖然可以請(qǐng)求侵權(quán)人停止侵權(quán),但并不能因此而要求獲得損害賠償。 第四章是結(jié)論部分,筆者對(duì)全文進(jìn)行了概述性的總結(jié)。再次強(qiáng)調(diào)了對(duì)兩類非法作品的權(quán)利范圍的界定和它們?cè)馐芮謾?quán)時(shí)可能獲得的救濟(jì)方式。
[Abstract]:From the beginning of Sino US intellectual property rights disputes, protection of intellectual property rights of the illegal works gradually aroused the concern of academics, February 26, 2010 on "the copyright law > the first paragraph of article fourth was amended, illegal work is to become the focus of academic circles. This paper is mainly about the classification standard of illegal works, how to carry out the scope of rights and remedies the illegal infringement of works, to study and discuss, in order to provide some practical suggestions for the judicial practice.
The introduction part, the author thinks that the illegal works should be divided into two types, namely the illegal procedure of work and illegal works. At the same time, this paper points out that, according to the classification of these two types of illegal works are mainly based on the judicial practice and the current "Copyright Law shall > Fourth, and the classification of the illegal works and this paper. Pointed out that the two kinds of illegal works such as the existence of work classification is not clear, the scope of rights is not clear and tort relief is uncertain problems.
The first chapter is "the types of illegal works and classification standards. Based on typical examples in judicial practice and the current" Copyright Law > Fourth, can be divided into procedural illegality of illegal works and works of the two types of illegal works. For illegal procedure of works, and their similarities in publishing, the process of communication work in violation of the relevant provisions of the state publishing regulatory. As for the content of illegal works, they can be further subdivided.
The second chapter is "the rights of the illegal works. The scope of illegal procedure of the copyright of the works of people not only enjoy the exclusive rights and enjoy the future through the legal way using the works. Because of this kind of works in the publishing and dissemination process, is only in violation of state regulations and publishing. Publishing regulations does not negate the copyright owner has the exclusive right to use and negative, the works. As for the content of illegal copyright people, they just enjoy the exclusive rights, and can not enjoy the use of the works.
The third chapter is "the judicial relief of illegal works. Before the court of justice, must examine the work involved, whether to review its work in violation of the Constitution and the law, damage the public interests, are involved in the work of censorship as a pre condition of judicial process, a key link essential. Procedures for illegal works, when the infringement damage, the copyright owner can request the infringer to stop the infringement, and may request the infringer to claim damages. The judicial trial in China spread without the approval of the foreign film and television works, the first to censorship whether the review of its content contained in violation of the Constitution and the law, damage the public interests of the components. To violate the Constitution and laws and damage the public interests of the works, the copyright owner can The infringer shall be requested to stop the infringement, but it can not therefore claim damages.
The fourth chapter is the conclusion. The author summarizes the whole article. It emphasizes the definition of the two categories of illegal works and the way of relief they may receive when they are infringed.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;著作權(quán)的概念[J];中國(guó)現(xiàn)代醫(yī)藥雜志;2011年06期

2 ;著作權(quán)的概念[J];中國(guó)現(xiàn)代醫(yī)藥雜志;2011年08期

3 ;關(guān)于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題研討會(huì)會(huì)議紀(jì)要[J];中國(guó)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)導(dǎo)報(bào);1996年06期

4 郭斯倫;;未授權(quán)演繹作品的著作權(quán)研究[J];中國(guó)版權(quán);2010年02期

5 隋金波;;現(xiàn)有法律制度框架下的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];青春歲月;2011年12期

6 雷雁林;;張?jiān)獫?jì)與中國(guó)近現(xiàn)代的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];中國(guó)編輯;2011年04期

7 牛嘉琦;;淺論微博著作權(quán)問(wèn)題[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年08期

8 徐華;;圖書館著作權(quán)保護(hù)的社會(huì)價(jià)值認(rèn)知及策略——基于《關(guān)于加強(qiáng)圖書館著作權(quán)保護(hù)工作的通知》之思考[J];河南圖書館學(xué)刊;2011年04期

9 鞏R，

本文編號(hào)：1542859