水流與壁面間切應力估計方法的比較研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-11-11 19:59
【摘要】:精確估計水流與壁面間切應力在泥沙輸移和水利工程安全方面具有重要意義。通過選取并整理文獻數據,對現今七種主要的水流與壁面間切應力的估計方法在不同雷諾數的條件下進行評價和比較,發(fā)現總體上湍流動能外推法和雷諾應力外推法估計壁面切應力的可靠性和精確度最高,平均相對誤差分別為3.2%和5.2%。湍流能量法、湍流動能法和雷諾應力法次之,以壁定理的精確度最低,但其所需的數據較容易獲取。二階應力法的精確度取決于阻力系數的取值。其中,壁定理和二階應力法的估計值偏高而更加安全,湍流動能外推法的估計值較為準確,而其余方法給出的估計值偏低。所得結果對不同條件下水流與壁面間切應力估計方法的選擇以及直接測量儀器的校準有一定的參考價值。
[Abstract]:Accurate estimation of shear stress between water flow and wall is of great significance in sediment transport and water conservancy engineering safety. By selecting and sorting out the literature data, seven main methods for estimating shear stress between water flow and wall are evaluated and compared under different Reynolds numbers. It is found that the overall reliability and accuracy of the turbulent kinetic energy extrapolation method and the Reynolds stress extrapolation method are the highest, and the average relative errors are 3.2% and 5.2%, respectively. Turbulence energy method, turbulent kinetic energy method and Reynolds stress method take the second place, the accuracy of wall theorem is the lowest, but the required data are easy to obtain. The accuracy of the second order stress method depends on the value of the resistance coefficient. Among them, the wall theorem and the second-order stress method are higher and more secure. The extrapolation method of turbulent kinetic energy is more accurate, while the other methods give lower estimates. The results are useful for the selection of shear stress estimation methods between water flow and wall and the calibration of direct measuring instruments.
【作者單位】: 河海大學水利水電工程學院;英國鄧迪大學土木工程系;河海大學水文水資源學院;
【基金】:國家自然科學基金項目(41471014)
【分類號】:TV131.3;TV14
本文編號:2325969
[Abstract]:Accurate estimation of shear stress between water flow and wall is of great significance in sediment transport and water conservancy engineering safety. By selecting and sorting out the literature data, seven main methods for estimating shear stress between water flow and wall are evaluated and compared under different Reynolds numbers. It is found that the overall reliability and accuracy of the turbulent kinetic energy extrapolation method and the Reynolds stress extrapolation method are the highest, and the average relative errors are 3.2% and 5.2%, respectively. Turbulence energy method, turbulent kinetic energy method and Reynolds stress method take the second place, the accuracy of wall theorem is the lowest, but the required data are easy to obtain. The accuracy of the second order stress method depends on the value of the resistance coefficient. Among them, the wall theorem and the second-order stress method are higher and more secure. The extrapolation method of turbulent kinetic energy is more accurate, while the other methods give lower estimates. The results are useful for the selection of shear stress estimation methods between water flow and wall and the calibration of direct measuring instruments.
【作者單位】: 河海大學水利水電工程學院;英國鄧迪大學土木工程系;河海大學水文水資源學院;
【基金】:國家自然科學基金項目(41471014)
【分類號】:TV131.3;TV14
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 黃歲j,丁君松;分汊河段床面切應力的試驗研究[J];泥沙研究;1990年01期
2 鄧伯強;淤泥臨界沖刷切應力研究[J];水動力學研究與進展(A輯);1991年03期
3 帕森尼艾茲;柴挺生;;粘性泥沙的沖刷和淤積的新近研究成果[J];水利水運科技情報;1975年06期
4 Zheng,,Y,Jin,Y.C,劉安康;矩形管渠中的邊界切應力[J];四川水利;1999年06期
5 程天金,謝葆玲;單邊突擴淺水回流水流結構研究[J];水動力學研究與進展(A輯);1992年04期
6 張長高;;恒定均勻紊流探討[J];華東水利學院學報;1985年01期
7 華景生,萬兆惠;粘性土及粘性土夾沙的起動規(guī)律研究[J];水科學進展;1992年04期
8 竇國仁,王國兵;賓漢極限切應力的研究[J];水利水運科學研究;1995年02期
9 芮德繁,劉興年;基于有效切應力下Meyer-Peter公式中的能坡修正[J];四川水利;2004年05期
10 幸韻;周華君;吳國茂;;恒定流下均勻橢球形卵石的起動研究[J];人民黃河;2014年07期
相關會議論文 前1條
1 許曉偉;陳昌仁;萬福緒;謝宇;;高等水生植物對太湖沉積物再懸浮特征的影響[A];首屆中國湖泊論壇論文集[C];2011年
本文編號:2325969
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/kejilunwen/shuiwenshuili/2325969.html